Agenus Inc.
Q4 2020 Earnings Call Transcript

Published:

  • Operator:
    Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by and welcome to the Agenus Fourth Quarter 2020 Conference Call and Webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note that this event is being recorded and may be used in future Agenus promotional material. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jan Medina, Director of Investor Relations. Jan, please go, ahead.
  • Jan Medina:
  • Garo Armen:
    Good morning. Thank you very much. In 2020, our pipeline continued to grow with an arsenal of agents designed to activate the immune system across different types of patients and cancers on one hand, while also addressing immunotherapy resistance pathways across many tumor types and the other. We expect these advances will contribute to the I-O field on multiple fronts. For instance, we are advancing AGEN1181's clinical development and generating responses in patients who are unlikely to otherwise respond to immunotherapy. We expect to advance AGEN1181 to registrational studies this year. We've also made substantial advances with our TIGIT programs, demonstrating the unique attributes of our bispecific antibody, which is IND-ready. One of our notable achievements during 2020 was the completion of patient enrollment and data analysis of our two most clinically advanced agents, balstilimab, which is our PD-1 antibody; and zalifrelimab, which is our first-generation CTLA-4 antibody. We call these bal and zal for short.
  • Jennifer Buell:
    Thank you Garo. As Garo indicated, our R&D engine has been enormously productive with numerous discoveries, IND filings, and product candidates advancing in late-stage trials. As a result, 2020 was a period of significant data flow. We presented data updates on our programs at all of the leading oncology conferences last year. At SITC, AACR and ASCO, we presented data on clinical responses with 1181, as well as the differentiation of our five lead molecules. And finally, we also presented data on our response predictive -- prediction platform VISION. With our TIGIT bispecific, AGEN1777, we presented data revealing the potential to broaden the activity beyond first generation of anti-TIGIT antibodies. We've engineered an important region of the molecule the Fc region to improve responses, expand the population of responders, and generate monotherapy activity, which is not currently seen with TIGIT monospecific antibodies available today. More recently at ESMO just a few months ago, we presented preliminary data from the balstilimab monotherapy and bal/zal combination studies, showing breakthrough activity in PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative cervical cancer patients. As we look into 2021 including AACR next month, we will continue our aggressive approach to data presentation, providing clinical updates on our lead compounds including AGEN1181. On our BLA filings, our rolling BLA filing for balstilimab monotherapy in second-line cervical cancer is underway. Initiated in September, we expect to complete the filing during the first half of this year. And as we disclosed in September, this timeline accommodates two additional late confirmed responders seen in our pivotal trial. We'll provide the FDA with six months of follow-up on those patients, as well as 12-month median follow-up on all trial participants. We believe balstilimab's approval would represent a meaningful new option for the cervical cancer community. We note that pembrolizumab, KEYTRUDA is approved in the PD-L1 positive population only and shows no clinical responses in PD-L1 negative tumors. And in the largest IO clinical trial in this population to date in over 160 patients treated with balstilimab alone, we reported response rates of 19% in PD-L1 positive patients and 10% in PD-L1 negative patients. This compares favorably to KEYTRUDA, which has 14% responses in PD-L1 positive tumors and no responses in PD-L1 negative tumors.
  • Andy Hurley:
    Thank you, Jen. My decision to join the Agenus team was driven by the excitement we all feel and the opportunities we have here under one roof. I'm also driven by our near-term prospects, which I believe could create substantial value. I'm particularly excited by how we can take our PD-1 balstilimab, and potentially grow it into a major franchise with a superior combination potential with AGEN1181. I believe 1181 will significantly expand the commercial opportunity of our anti-PD-1 with the potential to outperform current IO combinations. The clinical results to date have been very exciting, both as a monotherapy and in combinations across a wide array of tumor types. Specifically, as Jen said, cold tumors, such as microsatellite stable tumors, represent a significant portion within colorectal and endometrial cancers. And traditional PD-1 anti-CTLA-4 inhibitor therapies have not been as effective here. These are tumors, which don't generally respond to cancer immunotherapy, and yet we are seeing responses with AGEN1181. Practically and conceptually, we're not limited to any tumor type if the current response trends we are seeing continue. It's really a function of picky patients certifications, which can get us to the finish line quickly and leverage this to expand on our broader opportunities. Having our own PD-1 to pair with our superior CTLA-4 and then having our own unique CTLA-4, which can add significant value to our PD-1, are advantages which are very exciting for us to pursue. And then, there's the rest of our pipeline, including our intelligent, cell therapy program, our vaccines and exciting pipeline of antibodies with compelling early data. I feel the privilege of working with an exceptional team of people across all disciplines. I have worked at highly successful companies, but what we have here is very unique and exciting. I hope to interact with you more frequently, and do a deeper dive on our commercial strategy to create something exceptional. I appreciate the opportunity to express my plans. And I'll now turn the call over to Christine Klaskin to review our financials.
  • Christine Klaskin:
    Thank you, Andy. For the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized revenue of $88 million, which includes revenue related to the upfront license fee from our transaction with Betta, in addition to noncash royalties and milestones earned. For the year ended 2019, we recorded revenue of $150 million, which included revenue related to the upfront license fee from our transaction with Gilead and milestones earned in addition to non-cash royalties earned. Net loss for the fourth quarter was $38 million or $0.20 per share compared to a net loss for the same period in 2019 of $31 million, or $0.22 per share. Net loss for 2020 was $183 million, or $1.05 per share compared to a net loss for 2019 of $112 million or $0.80 per share. We ended 2020 with a cash balance of $100 million as compared to $62 million on December 31, 2019. I will now turn the call back to Garo for concluding remarks.
  • Garo Armen:
    In closing, the progress Agenus has made in the past year has set the stage for an exciting 2021. We expect to achieve value driving corporate events, clinical and preclinical pipeline events starting in the second quarter of this year, and they will include completing our BLA filing for balstilimab monotherapy in second-line cervical cancer; preparing for commercial launch in the second line cervical cancer market; defining our BLA filing strategy for bal/zal; clinical and preclinical data presentations at conferences, including or bal/zal 1181, TIGIT, iNKT cell therapy and other Agenus and partnered programs. Initiating clinical studies with our TIGIT program with the prioritization of AGEN1777; continuing with our Phase 2 development for AGEN1181 plus balstilimab with the goal of transitioning into registrational studies; continuing enrollment in the ongoing Phase 1 studies of iNKTs in COVID and in cancer; expanding Agenus' West capacity for internal and partnered manufacturing support; producing a sustainable supply of QS-21 for partnered programs; and lastly delivering cash accretive corporate transactions starting in the second quarter of this year. Thank you very much again for your interest. And now we're ready to open up for questions with myself. Dr. Buell, Andy Hurley, and Dr. Steven O'Day present. John? Maybe it's the – our –
  • Jan Medina:
    Liz, if you could get the Q&A going please.
  • Operator:
    Our first question comes from the line of Biren Amin with Jefferies.
  • Unidentified Analyst:
    Yeah. Hey, guys. This is Jeet on for Biren. Thanks for taking my questions. Congratulations on the progress to date. I'm looking forward to updates this year. Could you just maybe walk me through the timing perhaps between the bal BLA filing, and when you actually anticipate submitting the combo and perhaps when ultimate approval is perhaps expected there? And then second, just if you could talk through perhaps some of your go-to-market efforts to this point and any goals for the remainder of this year, and if there's any color on discussions with payers or thoughts on pricing that would be great. Thank you.
  • Garo Armen:
    Thank you, Biren. Let me start out addressing the bal/zal question. As you know and as we sort of alluded to, as data matures, looking at our past performance with data disclosures, we're delighted to see that the data is getting better. And I think given the size of our company and given the enormous demands on us for regulatory undertakings, we’ve made a decision several months ago which we articulated to the investment community that our first priority is to file our BLA with balstilimab. And once that's done, we will provide additional guidance for our timelines associated with our bal/zal filing. And of course, that will include disclosure of more mature data which we're in the process of addressing both from a public disclosure perspective as well as disclosing it to the agency.
  • Unidentified Analyst:
    Got it.
  • Garo Armen:
    As to go-to-market strategy, I'm assuming you're talking about go-to-product market strategy. And with that, I think, Andy, are you prepared to give us some initial remarks?
  • Andy Hurley:
    Sure. Yes, it's a good question. I've been here in a limited amount of time, but I can tell you that the launch planning is underway. We're really evaluating how we're going to really address the unmet needs in the marketplace and position this product in a way that addresses those unmet needs both at a physician level as well as on a patient level. At the patient level, you bring up the question on pricing and access, that’s going to be one of our absolute paramount priorities is just to ensure unencumbered access to balstilimab, as we look at the landscape that that's going to follow. We look at this as a pivotal part in our relationship with payers because we don't believe this is going to be, of course, our first and only into the marketplace. We want to be able to follow on with other products, and establishing those relationships and making sure that they understand our goals, which is unencumbered patient access is going to be really key. So, we're going to be starting those discussions with payers. We've done a lot of market research to understand really what are the drivers to position our product, and we're really encouraged by what we're hearing to be able to offer that in a setting both at the physician and patient level. So, I can tell you that I'm week four into the role. And ultimately, I'm very encouraged by the level of effort that's already been put in and our planning moving forward.
  • Unidentified Analyst:
    Got it. And if I could just ask one more follow-up question. On 1181, it seems like the AACR presentation will be fairly preclinical in nature. Just wanted to know if we can anticipate perhaps a robust clinical update on that perhaps later this year, and if we’ll maybe get us a look at that Phase 2 data in colorectal? Thanks.
  • Jennifer Buell:
    Hi, Jeet. Thanks for the question. Actually AACR certainly will include some pre-clinical information, but of course, we will also provide a clinical update on where we are with the programs, so stay tuned for more on that.
  • Operator:
    Our next question comes from Mayank Mamtani with B. Riley Securities.
  • Mayank Mamtani:
    Good morning team. Appreciate the comprehensive update and thanks for taking my questions, and great to have Dr. O'Day and Andy be part of the discussion. So maybe just piggybacking on the previous question on the upcoming 1181 clinical data at AACR, would you also have more updated cutoff relative to February 9? Could you just clarify that? And maybe Dr. O'Day if you could comment on why MSS colorectal indication kind of makes the first to pursue as you think about fast to market? Can you just talk about the dynamics of that indication?
  • Jennifer Buell:
    So, before I turn it over to Dr. O'Day, Mayank, thanks for your question. At AACR, yes, we will have a more mature data than what we've previously disclosed, and this will include more information on duration as well as potential new responses in the program too. Now, I'll turn it over to Dr. O'Day to give you his thinking on MSS colorectal cancer.
  • Steven O'Day:
    Thank you Mayank. Well, as Jenny said, I'm new to the company in recent months, but I have had the unique opportunity to be involved with 1181 over the course of the last several years both in learning about its exciting clinical drug design as well as pre-clinical data and then obviously being involved as the principal investigator in the 1181 Phase 1 trial. What's exciting to me is the pre-clinical data of more activity and T-reg depletion, as well as more potential access to low affinity CD16 alleles all seems to be playing out so far in the clinic with our Phase I trial. As you can imagine, with the competitive nature and approvals across I-O indications in solid tumors, Phase I trials attract fairly cold tumors that are MS-stable and there's no surprise that our trial has attracted those patients, particularly colorectal endometrial MS stable ovarian and others. And what's exciting to me is to see objective responses, obviously in both 1181 monotherapy in combinations in these cold tumors that are predominantly PD-L1 negative MS stable low tumor burden, and interestingly, in CD16 lower heterozygous affinity polymorphisms, which is all consistent with preclinical data. So given that fact, obviously, I'm excited to be part of the development of this drug as we go forward. And colorectal MS stable cohorts are clearly a huge unmet need with a low bar in the second and third-line setting. So, we're going to follow the data and expand these cohorts in cold tumors as well as look at our warm-to-hot tumors, both lung and then cutaneous tumors, melanoma, and non-melanoma cutaneous skin tumors are real opportunities for us to look both at this agent and single agent as well as combination. So, it's going to be exciting coming year for me and my clinical team to develop this very exciting drug.
  • Mayank Mamtani:
    Fantastic. That's very helpful. And then on -- two quick ones for Jen, and I have one more for Garo to close. Jen, what would be the path for QS-21 just from a clinical development standpoint? And also on the TIGIT bispecific, when do you expect disclosing the other target you're working on?
  • Jennifer Buell:
    So Mayank, I’m here. So let me start with TIGIT disclosing. As you can imagine, this is an incredibly competitive space. We have a bispecific that is a first of its kind we believe and it's designed really to address an entirely new area. So we will not be disclosing that anytime soon, but we'll certainly keep you informed as the data continue to progress both preclinically and then clinically and that may drive our decision on disclosures. For QS-21, the development is really straightforward. So as you know, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation had invested in our initiative to advance a sustainable supply of QS-21. We've done so we're in the process of doing so, but we've already generated early data and demonstrated the bio-comparability of this new supply compared to the previous clinic version, which is now in the approved Shingrix vaccine as you know. So the development is straightforward. It's preclinical comparability. And then the clinical program will be very abbreviated to bring this product into market with a number of vaccine products underway. And particularly, at this time when we see the criticality of effective vaccines, we know that historical vaccines no longer cut it. Flu vaccines at 30% efficacy just won't do it. So we need to improve our ability to take antigens allow for mass global production of those and this is where QS-21 is really critical at antigen sparing allowing a fewer number or lower amount of antigens to actually be quite effective. As you see with Shingrix, it's over 90%, up to 97% effective in adults and gets better with age. These are the kinds of findings that we're going to need across the board as we deal with these mutating viruses repeatedly.
  • Mayank Mamtani:
    Okay. Very helpful. So I think a number of different disease indications that you may consider including flu, including COVID, even Shingrix. Understood. Then, last for Garo, as you think about the cash accretive transactions, just can you just high level talk to the framework that you guys are kind of evaluating internally. When you think about prosecuting these opportunities across the board more advanced late-stage versus earlier stage programs? Kind of, how do you think about a lot of push and pull that might be associated with these transactions?
  • Garo Armen:
    Right. So all I can tell you right now is, stay tuned. As I said, in the second quarter, starting in the second quarter, we will see cash-accretive transactions including corporate transactions. So unfortunately, I cannot disclose anything more than that right now.
  • Mayank Mamtani:
    Okay. Thanks for taking my questions.
  • Operator:
    Our next question comes from the line of Matt Phipps with William Blair.
  • MattPhipps:
    Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. So this morning Sanofi and Regeneron announced positive Phase III results of Libtayo in cervical cancer. I know you guys had previously kind of hinted at meeting to get that accelerated approval BLA in before a full approval was there. I assume, given you guys are close to finishing the bal BLA that the Phase III positive results aren't going to affect that at this point, but just wanted to confirm.
  • Jennifer Buell:
    Hi Matt. Thanks for the question. Yes, I agree with you. So, the accelerated approval pathway remains open until full approval is granted in the same indication. Based on where we are with our filing, we don't believe this will impact our plans.
  • MattPhipps:
    And similarly, obviously, since the bal/zal combo that accelerated pathway should still be there as well?
  • Jennifer Buell:
    For bal/zal combo? Absolutely, others actually -- we're the front-runner there.
  • Matt Phipps:
    All right. Great. Thanks for taking the question.
  • Jennifer Buell:
    Thanks, matt.
  • Operator:
    I'm showing no further questions in queue at this time. I'd like to turn the call back to Garo Armen for closing remarks.
  • Garo Armen:
    Thank you, very much everybody. I think we have covered some of the really important highlights. I know that there is considerable amount in our roster here. We do prioritize some of the most important near-term priorities for us and so bear with us. And I think, with our new star team or added star team, I'm confident that we will be taking a number of these programs to the finish line expeditiously. Thank you, very much and we'll see you next time.
  • Operator:
    Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.