Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc.
Q2 2021 Earnings Call Transcript

Published: 4 Aug 2021

[Operator:]

Hello, and thank you for standing by. My name is Rocco, and I’ll be your conference operator today. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the prepared remarks, management will conduct a question-and-answer session, and conference participants will be given instructions at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. At this time, I will turn the call over to Makela Taphorn, Director, Investor Relations for Artisan Partners Asset Management.

[Makela Taphorn:]

Thank you. Welcome to the Artisan Partners Asset Management Business Update and Earnings Call. Today’s call will include remarks from Eric Colson, CEO; and C.J. Daley, CFO. Our latest results and investor presentation are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. Following these remarks, we will open the line for questions. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that comments made on today’s call including responses to questions may deal with forward-looking statements. These are subject to risks and uncertainties and are presented in the earnings release and detailed in our filings with the SEC. We are not required to update or revise any of these statements following the call. In addition, some of our remarks made today will include references to non-GAAP financial measures. You can find reconciliations of those measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in the earnings release. And I will now turn the call over to Eric Colson.

[Eric Colson:]

Thank you, Makela. And thank you, everyone, for taking the time to listen or read the transcript. We appreciate and value your time. We know that we cover the same topics and themes over and over. It is important that our stakeholders understand who we are, and the fundamental principles that guide our decision-making. So, we think it’s worth the time to go back over these points

[C.J. Daley:]

Thank you, Eric. I’ll begin on page 7 with AUM, which ended the quarter at $175.2 billion, up 8% compared to last quarter, and up 45% compared to the June quarter of 2020. The change in AUM over the quarter reflected $11 billion of investment returns and $1 billion of net client cash inflows, representing a 3% annualized organic growth rate. For the first six months of the year, strong investment returns contributed $15 billion to AUM. Net client cash inflows were $2.5 billion, also representing a 3% annualized organic growth rate. We believe investor returns, including returns in excess of benchmarks will continue to be the driver of growth in our business, as demonstrated this quarter and for the six-month period as well. Average AUM was $170.5 billion for the quarter, up 5% sequentially, and 56% compared to the June quarter of 2020. Year-to-date average AUM was up 49% compared to the first six months of 2020. Changes in AUM by generation are on page 8. Our third-generation strategies continued to achieve impressive growth. For the quarter, AUM and third-generation strategies grew 14% as a result of investment returns, and $1.9 billion of net client cash inflows. For the six-month period, AUM in our third-generation strategies grew primarily through net client cash inflows of $4.3 billion, representing a 31% annualized organic growth rate. And despite the measures we’ve taken to manage capacity in two of these strategies, we believe we will continue to see growth in our third-generation strategies. AUM in our first- and second-generation strategies grew through strong investment returns over the quarter and year-to-date periods, which more than offset modest net client cash outflows across both periods. Net client cash outflows were significantly driven by client rebalancing after several strong years of investment returns. Financial results for the quarter and year-to-date periods are presented on the next two pages. Our complete GAAP and adjusted results are presented in our earnings release. My comments will focus on our adjusted results. Starting with quarterly results. Revenues grew 5% compared to the previous quarter on higher average AUM and one additional calendar day in the quarter. Revenues were up 50%, compared to the second quarter of 2020, also primarily due to higher average AUM. Adjusted operating expenses decreased 1% sequentially, as lower as seasonal expenses in the second quarter, more than offset the increase in variable compensation and distribution related expenses due to revenue growth. Year-over-year, quarterly adjusted operating expense increased 32% as variable costs increased with higher revenue and fixed compensation costs grew as a result of a higher number of full time employees. Our adjusted operating income grew 13% sequentially and 80% year-over-year, and our adjusted operating margin improved to 45.3% this quarter. Adjusted net income per adjusted share also grew 13%, compared to the first quarter and 80% compared to the June 2020 quarter. Year-to-date, financial results reflect the same themes as the quarterly results I just highlighted. Year-to-date revenues increased 47% compared to 2020, primarily due to an increase in average AUM. Year-to-date adjusted operating expenses increased 30% in 2021 as variable costs increase with higher revenues and compensation costs increased as a result of an increase in the number of employees. Our adjusted income grew 76% and our adjusted operating margin for the six months period was 43.6%. Our balance sheet continues to remain strong and support our capital management practices. We maintain approximately $100 million of excess cash to fund operations, seed new products, and make continued investments in new teams, operational capabilities and technology. In addition, our $100 million line of credit remains undrawn. Dividends are presented on slide 12. Our Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend of $1 per share with respect to the June 2021 quarter, which represents approximately 80% of the cash generated. That concludes my prepared remarks. And I will now turn the call back to Eric for some additional commentary.

[Eric Colson:]

This is Eric again. Before C.J. and I take questions, I want to take a minute to discuss the changes we recently announced to our Board of Directors. Stephanie DiMarco, who joined our Board in 2013 in conjunction with our IPO, will become Chairperson of the Board and Saloni Multani will join our Board, bringing the total number of Directors to eight, seven of whom will be independent of management. Our Board and corporate governance have evolved since our IPO. Over time, we have added new and diverse perspectives, individuals who broaden the Board’s experience, skillset and ability as a governing body. We have also retained strong representation from individuals who experience with Artisan dates back to the founding of the firm 25 years ago, individuals who are deeply immersed in our history and culture as an investment firm, deeply committed to our talent-driven patient approach, and who have seen firsthand the power of our model and the results that can generate over extended time periods. Independent governance and transparency as a public company makes us stronger and distinguishes us from many of our peers. At the same time, we’re able to maintain a long-term mindset and willingness to be different, more often associated with private firms. These earning calls are a good example of both, our transparency and our commitment to long-termism and remaining disciplined to who we are as a firm, whether private or public. Ultimately, what matters is not a company’s legal structure, but who we are, and aligning our governance, operation and transparency to support our purpose as an investment firm, and increase the sustainability and duration of what we do for our clients, our people and our owners. I will now turn it over to the operator to take questions.

[Operator:]

Thank you. Today’s first question comes from Alex Blostein with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

[Alex Blostein:]

Great. Good morning, everybody. Thanks for -- good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. I wanted to start maybe with a couple of questions around your approach to capital management in light of what’s obviously been a fairly challenging share price for the last six to nine months or so. I guess, when you think about some of the drivers, at least in the public markets of value, organic growth definitely comes up as one of the more important ones, and I know, Eric, you guys don’t target flows specifically. But Artisan does have a positive organic growth backdrop, pretty clean balance sheet, obviously good long-term track record, yet the stock obviously has been sort of challenged here. So, given the free cash flow yield that is in kind of high single digits now, any room to pivot to more aggressive share repurchase, as you think about long-term value for shareholders?

[C.J. Daley:]

Yes. Alex, this is C.J. I don’t think there’s -- I know there isn’t any change in our mindset or the Board’s mindset around our capital management policy. We’ve been pretty consistent, transparent, and we like the predictability of our current policy. So, I would not expect any changes, specifically, I think you’re referring to whether we do stock buybacks or not. So, I would not anticipate that you should expect that.

[Alex Blostein:]

Okay. And then, I guess, when you think about building out some of the new strategies, I was hoping you could expand what you guys are doing on the private market side of things, both in terms of product development and how you think about distribution of that product down the road.

[Eric Colson:]

Yes, certainly Alex, this is Eric. Obviously, with the launch of the China Post-Venture which specifically adds its investment degrees of freedom to include both public and private, the mindset with that strategy and some of our other strategies is to leverage investment degrees of freedom and broaden the use of private securities where appropriate. So, we see this as a continuing trend in the industry. We see it as a continuing theme inside of Artisan. And, we expect to build out more infrastructure and support around this effort, as well as incorporate more private securities across other investment teams. And it also heavily influences how we look at future teams and teams’ ability to broaden the universe. It’s very obvious in the U.S. on the number of securities, going from over 8,000 to under 4,000 of publicly traded. You’ve seen the growth of private company universe, as companies have stayed longer private. And especially the late-stage private companies have a lot of characteristics that you see and the early stage public companies. So, that blending is occurring. We always take it as an investment first approach. So, the support or model around privates is very important. And it is -- it needs to be acknowledged, it is different than the public markets. And the resources to creating a network, providing access to management and being able to compete, to put capital to work and companies that fit our philosophy and approach for strategy will require time. It’s a multi-year investment and focus to get to those -- to access those markets. And, as we build that out, we are looking at how to marry that with the right vehicle and right distribution model, which we’re spending more time on today. But, we are very optimistic, given the early success we’ve had with China Post-Venture.

[Alex Blostein:]

Great. Thank you.

[Operator:]

And our next question today comes from Bill Katz with Citigroup. Please go ahead.

[Bill Katz:]

Okay. Thank you very much for taking the questions this afternoon. In terms of just sort of building off that last question, could you maybe step back and say, where are you in terms of pipeline of discussions with other teams? What’s the priority of that versus maybe the opportunity to enhance the product set on the private side, across maybe your existing footprint? And then, when you say, it takes a couple of years to build this out, is that sort of even with the existing teams or is that so as you add teams on? Sorry, if I missed the question. Thank you.

[Eric Colson:]

Yes. Obviously, right now, we view there is quite a bit of opportunity in the marketplace for Artisan with regards to our existing teams, as well as new teams in the marketplace. With the breadth of strategies we have today in-house, we are spending quite a bit of time of how to build out existing teams, resources and functionality to capture investing in private markets or in other areas that broaden out the degrees of freedom. That is typically our highest priority and consumes the most amount of resources is supporting the known versus the unknown, and that has paid off for us over the years. And you’ve seen that with the highlighting of two teams that are embedded in -- two mature teams highlighted on the call today. We are fielding quite a few teams that we’re meeting with. Some would go into privates, others would be in other asset classes. That would be a lower percentage of time versus our existing teams. I would say, the one to two-year comment, Bill, is more around our existing teams. As you transition from public to incorporating privates, it requires resources and networks that need to be built out. With regard to the new teams, you may have that skill set embedded with the people that you bring in. For example, the China Post-Venture, Tiffany Hsiao and her team brought a very strong network and ability to interact and move forward in private. And, we launched day one with that strategy, incorporating privates. So, hopefully that answers your question.

[Bill Katz:]

Very helpful. Second question, just sort of staying on your sort of the discussion between interplay of sort of AUM growth and flows. You’ve been pretty transparent in terms of some of the building capacity issues? Can you sort of step back and give us a sense of where you think you always look across the platform in terms of related capacity constraints? And then, on those mandates where you’ve actually made some announcements, can you talk a little about like the residual capacity in the separately managed account or separate account segment?

[Eric Colson:]

Yes, certainly. I mean, we’ve made some announcement around soft closing, various strategies. And I guess, just to be clear, soft closing, in my mind, is a glide path to managing long-term capacity. It’s really, if an investor takes a longer time horizon and really understands our business model, this should be viewed as increasing the probability of long-term growth. As we illustrated on slide 5, I mean, really highlighting our sources of growth. We find this has the highest probability projecting growth out in the long-term. And in our view, I mean, really looking at short-term growth over the next one to two years is highly unpredictable. There are many factors that go into the pipeline and how decisions are made and when the timing of those dollars occur. And we just don’t view the soft close or the announcement as an on-off switch. Given that we are in a relationship business and really the prospects that look at our strategies take months and years to analyze, you have to manage those relationships and communicate over time of where capacity is at. And so, these announcements signal that we’re managing capacity, and each strategy is slightly different. In some cases, we might manage the separate account business, in other cases we might manage the pooled vehicle, so that we maintain a diverse asset base. And the outcome of soft closing could be an influx of dollars coming in a shorter time period; it also could mean just a grandfather list of clients that have set dollars over certain time periods that may take years to come in. Regardless, the impact on the short-term is really hard to predict. But, over the long-term, it’s really compounded growth quite well. And so, you’d have to go strategy by strategy, go on separate account or pooled vehicle for each of these.

[Bill Katz:]

Okay. And if I could just slip one more, and thanks for taking all the questions today. Maybe one for C.J. As just sort of contemplate -- I know there is a lot of moving parts, just as you contemplate maybe the glide path around expense outlook for the second half of the year, can you give us a sense of maybe exit pacing, particularly for some of the non-comp segments?

[C.J. Daley:]

What do you mean by the exit pacing?

[Bill Katz:]

Well, just where -- how you sort of see the second half stacking up, so the economy opens and maybe travel and entertainment and sort of discussing things that may have been a little depressed, given COVID?

[C.J. Daley:]

Yes. I mean, you’re really seeing the impact of COVID in that G&A line. And we’re currently realizing about $2.5 million to $3 million of quarterly expense reductions as a result of not being in the office and not traveling. And it’s hard to tell, I mean, we would have expected that after Labor Day that things would have slowly started back to normal, but that seems to be delayed now with the Delta variant. And so, hard to predict when that would come back, but we would expect that when it does come back in full that that $2.5 million or $3 million per quarter will make its way back into our expense base.

[Operator:]

And our next question today comes from Dan Fannon with Jefferies. Please go ahead.

[Dan Fannon:]

I was just looking at the third-generation funds and the kind of vehicles that is broken out on slide 8, and the variance -- the difference between the third-generation and the second-generation. And just curious, if there is anything structurally why we estimate vehicles wouldn’t be a bigger component of that line of products matures over time?

[Eric Colson:]

Yes. The third-generation, what leans a little bit more in degrees of freedom. And when you look at emerging markets or the use of private, that good to have a broad array of separate accounts that have the country openings, or the ability to operate in more illiquid segments tend to bias our asset rays into pooled vehicles with a more uniform investment policy statement around it versus individual IMAs and reliance on the client to be able to handle the breadth of securities or regions that we’re going to operate in. So, as you up degrees of freedom and you see that into maybe even the hedge fund or the private equity space, you see a higher use of a pooled vehicle, whether it’s a private fund or -- that use it or a CIT. So, it’s really a reflective -- reflection on the breadth of those strategies.

[Dan Fannon:]

And then, one more just on capacity, given the strengths in data and your AUM post, when you look at the frontline of today, are there funds or strategies that are on watch that maybe are closer than others that you look out over the next 6 to 12 months, potentially could be part of that soft close component that you’ve done more recently?

[Eric Colson:]

I think we’ve talked about the small cap growth is one of those that we’ve been managing capacity and keeping an eye on the net flows is probably one strategy that is not formally stated. Otherwise, everything else is in the open market there.

[Operator:]

Our next question today comes from Kenneth Lee with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead.

[Kenneth Lee:]

Wondering if you could just share with us your latest thoughts around the potential -- any potential to expand distribution partnerships over time? Thanks.

[Eric Colson:]

We’ve made one partnership in Australia to go deeper into the high net worth financial advisory. We’ve built a very strong institutional presence in Australia, and we’ve got a bit deeper into that market place. With China Post-Venture, we’ve broadened our distribution into the high net worth marketplace in a more meaningful way than prior to China Post-Venture coming. It just sparked interest from clients that we haven’t normally interacted with. With regards to that segment, we’ll build that distribution capability in-house. And as we bring on more alternative-oriented strategies like China Post-Venture, we will resource in-house that distribution, similar to how we attacked the intermediary market when the broker dealer market was growing years ago, or when the defined contribution was growing, we brought in some individuals to focus on DC and then it got incorporated into our broader distribution. And as we up the number of alternative oriented strategies, we’ll build that capability in-house more than relying on pure partnerships. And we continue to stand out on some of the high net worth and financial service companies outside the U.S. to get leverage of our global products. But, no specific distribution partners to call out today.

[Kenneth Lee:]

And just one follow-up, if I may and this is just off a previous question. Are there any particular whitespace investment strategies outside of private assets that you could highlight as potential areas that Artisan could explore? Thanks.

[Eric Colson:]

The privates are pretty broad trends. When you look at the ability today of leveraging a really strong public-oriented investment background, let’s say, Tiffany’s history and ability to now extend into a certain percentage of private. So, you can really look across credit, real estate and infrastructure, or I guess, any real asset, and the blend of public private provides a really strong opportunity for Artisan that’s navigated in the high value-added public strategy arena, and then being able to extend, a percentage of each of those strategies ends into privates. It allows us to look at an array of asset classes that may have been more traditional in the private space. Now with the blending, it opens up, our opportunity. And the ability to onboard Tiffany and the China Post-Venture to transact on private companies now in that strategy and to raise dollars to match that is a great signal to the marketplace that we can operate in this broad whitespace of the blending of public and privates across multiple asset classes.

[Kenneth Lee:]

That’s very helpful. Thanks again.

[Operator:]

Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today’s question-and-answer session and today’s conference call. We thank you all for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful day.