Cornerstone Building Brands, Inc.
Q3 2016 Earnings Call Transcript

Published: 31 Aug 2016

[Operator:]

Greetings and welcome to the NCI Building Systems' Third Quarter 2016 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Darcey Matthews, Vice President of Investor Relations for NCI Building Systems. Thank you, you may now begin.

[Darcey Matthews:]

Thank you, Melisa. Good morning and welcome to NCI Building Systems’ call to review the Company's results for the third quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company's third quarter results were issued last night in a press release that was covered by the financial media. In keeping with SEC requirements, I would like to advise that during the call, we will be making forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Actual outcomes may differ materially from those expected or implied. For a more detailed discussion of the risks and uncertainties that may affect NCI, please review our SEC filings, including the 8-K that we filed last night. We undertake no obligations to update any forward-looking statements beyond what is required by applicable securities laws. In addition, our discussions of operating performance will include non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of those measures with the most direct comparable GAAP measures are included in the earnings release and the CFO commentary, both of which are available on our website. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to NCI's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Norm Chambers.

[Norman Chambers:]

Thanks Darcey. Good morning, everyone. As you know, our third quarter earnings were released last night. This morning, I plan to provide a few brief comments before I turn the call over to Mark, who will offer additional details regarding our third quarter financial performance. After that we will be happy to take your questions. I’ll start by sharing with you key highlights from our third quarter. First, I’m pleased to say that thanks to our improved platform of manufacturing supply chain management combined with ongoing strong commercial focus and discipline, we have delivered a meaningful year-over-year improvement in gross profit margin EBITDA in our third quarter. Gross profit margin expanded 380 basis points and adjusted EBITDA increased by 50% on a year-over-year basis. This operational platform that we have created and successfully put in place over the past two years is allowing us to generate both top and bottom line growth on a more predictable basis. Second and directly related to my platform, we were able to deliver better than originally anticipated financial performance this quarter in a rising steel price environment, because of our manufacturing supply chain team's ability to convert higher volumes supporting the excellent job our commercial team did working with their customers. While demand for our products was good across all of our businesses, we do believe that rising steel cost prompted some of our customers to pull forward as much as $5 million to $10 million in sales that would have likely occurred in Q4. Over the years, similar pull forward is rather routine in a rising steel price environment. While this has no impact on our fiscal year, it does impact the individual quarters reported revenue, sorry. Our commercial team has done a superb job in remaining very disciplined in the face of rapidly rising steel costs something that we have death with many times in the past. Third, our year-over-year volume increase by 11.6%, which similar to the preceding several quarters exceeded the underlying 9.9% growth in revenue. While all three of our segments including the insulated metal products performed very well. Our components business was particularly strong due to increased demand for both our legacy single skin components and insulated metal products. In addition, not only did the coating segment continue to benefit from robust internal volume, excellent volumes also showed very strong growth. Our building segment also delivered a strong year-over-year improvement in volume, gross profit and margin, we have worked hard at reducing our manufacturing logistic cost to optimize our manufacturing in order to create the kind of operating leverage that allows increased volume to drive the higher efficiencies in our manufacturing and result in higher capacity utilization. In fact manufacturing efficiencies was again a contributor to improved margins this quarter accounting for approximately 40 basis points of year-over-year improvement. Fourth, we continue to generate above market growth in insulated metal panels during due in large part with the strength of our internal distribution network developed over the past several decades. And product substitution from traditional building products resulting from a higher energy efficiency regulations that we find throughout North America. Strong demand from some large market segments in cold storage and higher margin mix resulted in material increases in the IMP both in volume and margin. We accomplished all of this against the background of modest growth in non-res construction starts. Our buildings group’s bookings improved on a year-over-year, which supported our backlog growth of 3.5%. On a consolidated basis including in 200 metal panels, our projects, our backlog was increased by just over 10%, that’s a very healthy backlog take into Q4 and in the start with 2017. Finally, the impact of the internal improvements we have implemented over the past 2.5 years can be seen in 54% increased in our trailing 12-month EBITDA and there should be more to come as we plan additional material years in both process improvements and manufacturing efficiencies. Now a word about the industry, the leading indicators to correlate most closely to our actual volumes, our low-rise non-construction starts, the residential single family starts, the ABI mixed use index and the leading economic indicator. Taken together, these industries continue to suggest 4% to 6% growth in low-rise constriction starts for the remainder of this fiscal year and the first half of next year. I would like to leave you with one last comment, the operating platform, we have created combined with the organizational changes we have implemented over the past 18-months has given us the flexibility and speed to respond to increased demand and take advantage of market opportunities. This contributes to our confidence of continued success and execution and financial performance. Now Mark will take you through more details.

[Mark Johnson:]

Thank you, Norm. As usual, we have provided a review of our 2016 third quarter financials in both the earnings press release issued yesterday and the quarterly supplemental presentation posted on our website. I’ll now take a few minutes to add some additional insights to those results. Overall, the third quarter as within the range of our expectations and in line with the midpoint of the revised guidance we gave on July 18. Key drivers in the current quarter were similar to what we have seen so far this year, strong volume growth and solid margin improvement. As Norm mentioned, all of our business segments continue to benefit from the improvement initiatives that we began implementing about two years ago, including supply chain management, commercial focus in discipline and manufacturing and operational restructuring. In addition, during the quarter, we were able to successfully navigate a directional change in steel input costs, which began increasing and reached parity with the prior year during the last month of the quarter. As a result of these initiatives and a successful pass through of these costs increases, our gross margin grew by 380 basis points to 27.7%, which was at the upper end of the guidance we have provided. It should also be noted that this improvement in margin is net of some incremental residual costs related to the ramp up of our Hamilton insulated panel plant in Canada and the discontinuance and relocation of another insulated metal panel facility. Both of these plants reside within the component segment and together these costs [predicts] (Ph) margins by an estimated 60 basis points. These incremental costs are expected to dissipate overtime, as the facilities become fully operational. Our adjusted EBITDA rose by 51% or about $19.6 million to $57.8 million during the quarter in the same period last year. As illustrated on Slide 9 of our supplemental presentation, we estimate that approximately $12 million of this increase can be attributed to underlying volume growth and about $14 million resulted from margin expansion. Offsetting these positive items, were approximately $3 million of cost from the previously mentioned ramp up and relocation activities in our insulated panel facilities. In addition, by design, our incentive compensation costs are highly correlated to our operating performance and therefore increased by approximately $5 million as compared to the same period of the prior year. The SG&A expenses increased by approximately $6 million from the same period last year to both to the increase in underlying volume of activity and because of higher incentive compensation accruals, which are tied to match operating performance. However, as a percentage of revenues, the SG&A expenses declined to 17.4% in the quarter from 17.7% in last year’s third quarter. Now briefly turning to our segment operating results. Our Components Group was the largest contributor to year-over-year earnings growth again this period. So far this year, the Components Group have seen an increase in demand for both insulated panel products as well as our legacy metal components products, which continued in our third quarter leading to a 15.4% increase in revenues. Importantly, we have seen a notable increase in the demand for insulated panel products through our legacy components and building sales channel on a year-over-year basis with IMP related bookings in our building segment over the last five months increasing 65%. The underlying demand improvement enhanced by the commercial and manufacturing, restructuring initiative, as well as improvements in our supply chain effectiveness had allowed us to improve our operating margins from approximately 7% last year to approximately 13% in the current quarter. The integration of CENTRIA into our operations, which was acquired in the first quarter of 2015, continues to progress as expected and we are beginning to see the favorable impacts from supply chain and cost synergies in our operating results. The coaters group benefited from not only strong external demand, but also from similar increases in internal volumes to support the components and building segments. Higher plant utilization combined with commercial discipline in the face of rising raw material cost resulted in operating margins expanding from approximately 9% in the prior year to 12% in the current quarters. Our Buildings Group revenue grew approximately 2.6% to $181 million. The growth rate in this segment has been more subdued when compared to our other two divisions as a result of higher exposure to the weaker industrial and manufacturing end markets. Operating margins in this business increased from 8% last year to 11% in the current quarter. Similar to the other divisions, higher plant utilization and commercial discipline combined with supply chain effectiveness in the face of increasing steel input cost are the primary contributors to the margin expansion. Now, I’ll take a brief look at some item on our balance sheet. We ended the quarter with a cash balance of $50.7 million and pre-tax unlevered free cash flow to find the adjusted EBITDA minus CapEx and net changes in working capital was approximately $38 million for the quarter. Turning to third quarter, we used cash to continue our debt reduction plan as well as repurchase outstanding shares of common stock under our amended stock repurchase program. We paid down another $10 million of long-term debt for a total reduction of $30 million year-to-date on our term loan. Following the end of the quarter, we paid an additional $10 million bringing us to a total of $40 million debt reduction in FY 2016 to-date. Our net debt leverage ratio at the end of the third fiscal quarter was 2.2 times as compared to the 3.4 times at the same time last year. In addition, during July, concurrent with an underwritten registered public secondary offering, we purchased and retired approximately 2.9 million shares of common stock from Clayton Dubilier & Rice for $45 million for a net price of $15.46 per share. This repurchase was completed at the same offering price less the underwriting discount at the secondary offering in which approximately 9 million shares were sold by CD&R, which brought their ownership from 58% to approximately 42%. Turing to our outlook for the remainder of the year. We continue to expect the fourth quarter to be broadly in line with the third quarter in terms of operating results. You may recall that we raised third quarter guidance in July, which included revenues, gross margin and adjusted EBITDA. As a result, the full second half of 2016 will represent a continuation of the trend of modest growth and underlying volumes with strong year-over-year margin expansion. In the fourth quarter, we estimate consolidate revenue will range between $475 million and $500 million with gross margins ranging between 24.5% and 27%. As a reminder, we have provided additional financial guidance for the fourth quarter and the supplemental materials posted on our website. We believe it is important to focus on the third and fourth quarter trends taken together, because while it is difficult to quantify. Our guidance range accommodates a likelihood that some customers particularly in our Components Group may have accelerated project delivers for as much as $5 million to $10 million into the third quarter to avoid some of the rapid increasing steel costs. In addition, the two quarters taken together will encompass the complete increased cycle for steel cots, with the majority of the steel increases and related pass through the customers occurring in our fourth fiscal quarter. Sequential steel input costs are expected to be approximately 12% to 16% higher in the fourth quarter as compared to the third quarter. So the full steel increase cycle is not yet complete. Based on our above market growth and backlog particularly for insulated metal panels, we expect to continue to outpace the non-residential construction market through the end of the year. Our analysis of leading indicators for the low-rise non-residential new construction starts points to continued mid single-digit growth rates into 2017. With our operating platforms solidly in place, we expect to outpace these trends as we have so far this year. Further, we are in the early stages of three-year strategic initiatives and has only just begun to realize some of the benefits and we will continue to look for opportunities to cut costs, eliminate redundancies, identify synergies and align our capabilities and capacities with our customers' needs. Now operator, I will turn the call back over to you for questions.

[Operator:]

Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions]. Our first question comes from the line of Bob Wetenhall with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions.

[Mark Weintraub:]

Hi. Good morning. This is actually Mark Weintraub for Bob.

[Unidentified Company Representative:]

Hi Mark.

[Mark Weintraub:]

Would you talk about the improve mix within your insulated metal panel products and the length of the runway you see there. And then more generally, your component margin really stands out, even if you compare it to last year’s fourth quarter, it still looks like about 350 basis points improvement. How should we be thinking about the margin in that segment going forward?

[Norman Chambers:]

Okay. So I’ll start, the insulated metal panel part of our business has shown really good growth in their backlog and we are particularly please, because the high-end, the architectural panels essentially ourselves have grown by something like 60% on a year-over-year in most part of that backlog and that’s a very good trend for us. And as you know, the century of backlog takes longer to get out, because the sales cycle in the building part of that - because the projects are larger. The growth that we have seen internally over the last five months again is up from the ICI, which is the industrial, commercial and institutional piece by something like 60% and again, we see that is a very good trend. Overall, our backlog is very solid in terms of insulated metal panels. When I think about the components part that’s really a function of all the stuff that that team has done over the last two-years on pricing ability, and systems, and process, sales force, a focus that the team are brining to that, next day delivery, working with the customers, the outward bound calls, all of the things that we put in place. And they continue to do particularly well and they advantage themselves more in the commercial and retail part of the business and that’s been very strong for us. So when we look forward, we continue to see the opportunities for growth, the Components Group continues to doing very well and we are pleased where we are there. Mark, do you want to add anything to that.

[Mark Weintraub:]

That’s pretty full Norman. Thank you.

[Operator:]

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Steven Fisher with UBS. Please proceed with your question.

[Steven Fisher:]

Thanks good morning. Just a couple of questions on backlog. Of that 10% growth in backlog. Can you clarify how of that is volume versus price?

[Mark Johnson:]

I would say it’s about 75% volume and 25% price.

[Steven Fisher:]

Okay that’s helpful. And can you just talk about what the duration of that backlog is, I know you guys has talked about sort of visibility through the first half of 2017. I’m just kind of curious as to how much that backlog gives you visibility through that timeframe and kind of when you might get some visibility into the second half of next year?

[Norman Chambers:]

Well let’s start here, the second half of next year, we will be building that visibility in the first two quarters of 2017 that’s how that occurs in the Building’s Group, because as you know the backlogs snapshots the end of the period and we are booking all the time and adding to that. So that kind of growth is - what the market provides and what we are able to do will be visible in that period. In the insulated metal panel piece, particularly the [CENTRIA] (Ph) pieces just as I said that’s a longer time to get out of that. So that gives us probably more visibility into 2017. One of the things that I think is encouraging now is that that backlog really gives us a starting point that is very good and we take not comfort, but we are really pleased with that backlog. So we are very optimistic about our chances to continue doing exactly what we have been doing and that’s doing better than the market.

[Steven Fisher:]

Okay, but just to be clear so you are current backlog will that have basically been burned by the middle of 2017?

[Norman Chambers:]

So certainly, I would say something like three quarters of it will be burned that way and the insulated metal panels will be a little longer. So we say in the building backlog that it gives us a good two quarters view of direction.

[Steven Fisher:]

Okay, thank you.

[Operator:]

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Lee Jagoda with CJS Securities. Please proceed with your question.

[Lee Jagoda:]

Hi, good morning.

[Norman Chambers:]

Good morning.

[Lee Jagoda:]

Just focusing on Slide 9 in your commentary where it talks about EBITDA and the bridge from last year to this year. There is a $14.4 million increase from what you are calling margin expansion. Given it’s the biggest delta there, could you provide a little more clarity?

[Mark Johnson:]

Yes, there is an additional page, the primary driver is the improvement in gross margin with some benefits that is also seen in the ESG&A line, but the predominant factor is the 380 basis points improvement in gross margin. So there is a really good walk forward on that on Page 8 of the same presentation. And the same thing that we have been talking about in each of the first three quarters of this year driving that expansion and margin year-over-year and they are all intertwined in all of the efforts we have made to restructure the business, restructure our focus in commercial as well as supply chain and then start utilizing our assets and facilities with a much wider view of their capability. So I have broken than margin expansion down into its component pieces on Page 8.

[Norman Chambers:]

So one of the things that’s important is to understand that the margin improvement as we go forward will be a function of all three parts of our business, meaning the commercial activities and the good, better, best approach that we have there in terms of our pricing and positioning of our products. The second thing is our ability to manufacturing to add value and supply chain doing a great job on transportation as well as their purchasing ability. And then finally, the cost reduction exercises that we are doing. That we are really in the fairly early stages of the part that we discussed in December of last year, we are probably 50% into that a little better in terms of the manufacturing side and then we have more to do there and get that run rate by 2018, it will be very important. And then, in addition to that we have the ESG&A approach that we are taking right now as well which is at the very early start of it. But together it's a combination of not just the pricing, not just the spread, it's across the whole platform that we are looking at to increase our margin expansion.

[Lee Jagoda:]

Okay. And then just one quick one on tax rate. Can you go through the factors that pushed tax rate lower in 2016 and how we can think about starting to model that in 2017?

[Mark Johnson:]

Yes, the predominant thing that made our taxes lower is versus the prior years the fact that we have much stronger net income being produced and that makes available to us in the production tax credits that are available for manufacturing companies. And you can only have those deductions when you have relatively strong profits. So we are taking advantage of that and we expect to continue to be able to take advantage as long as that's in place.

[Lee Jagoda:]

Great, thanks.

[Norman Chambers:]

Thank you.

[Operator:]

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Alex Rygiel with FBR Capital Markets. Please proceed with your question.

[Alex Rygiel:]

Good morning Norman and Mark, nice quarter.

[Norman Chambers:]

Thank you, Alex.

[Alex Rygiel:]

A couple of quick questions. First on the sales that were pulled forward, when you characterize those as sort of on the lower scale of margin opportunity or on the higher scale margin opportunity.

[Norman Chambers:]

It's probably a wash and it's in that $5 million to $10 million range and that was predominantly occurring with our single skin business, our legacy business. And again, as I said in my script that's not unusual, we see stuff like that all the time in steel price increases and that's been the case over the last decade.

[Alex Rygiel:]

And then, as it relates to your backlog, you mentioned a number of different times there is a little bit of a mix improvement in backlog, I suspect that's because you have seen greater than anticipated growth in the IMP business, but if you could talk a little bit more about that improved mix that would be helpful in backlog.

[Norman Chambers:]

We focus on three broad scopes of market IMP and this is in the good, better, best. The cold storage piece is very good to us in terms of the opportunities we have there, in terms of long runs and that's in our good product mix. And then the ICI, which is the part of the market, which gives us the greatest opportunity for growth and penetration and that's why I mentioned the internal aspects of that moving our products through our existing distribution channels that we have developed over the last two or three decades, grew in the last five months by 64% on a year-over-year basis. We really are pleased to see that and that complements our direct third-party sales that we have now as well. So we are very pleased with how that is coming together, the team is doing a really a first-class job.

[Alex Rygiel:]

And then last on your fourth quarter guidance. What could play out that could cause you to be at the low end of your range?

[Norman Chambers:]

Well so Mark can probably as I open up on it, we want to be prudent, we want to be thoughtful and how we go about this, because we are clearly going to see the highest increase in steel costs in our fourth quarter. Now we are experienced in handling that, working with that and as you know over year’s period those increases are counter balance. So it’s a function of where we are in that steel price movement and cycle. So that’s the reason why we want to be thoughtful and improving about our Q4?

[Alex Rygiel:]

That’s helpful. Thank you very much.

[Operator:]

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Trey Grooms with Stephens Inc. Please proceed with your question.

[Trey Groom:]

Good morning.

[Norman Chambers:]

Good morning, sir.

[Trey Groom:]

Mark you mentioned in your comments opportunity for additional ESG&A efficiencies. I think you guys have touched on that in the past, but how should we be thinking about that, as far as kind of quantifying this opportunity and the timing there?

[Mark Johnson:]

Sure. In the past, we have spoken about really two areas of focus. We have spoken about our restructuring views of manufacturing and efforts underway that really align our capabilities with what our customers’ needs are which is ongoing. And we have range that to be an opportunity between $15 million and $20 million of annual improvement in cost structure. And we are in the early stages of that.

[Norman Chambers:]

About 50% on that one. Right?

[Mark Johnson:]

50% in the actions, but in terms of the actual savings to the bottom-line, those are more backend loaded. So we will start to see that strengthen in 2017 and 2018, in which case, we will get about half of the improvement in each of those two years. So we are at the full run rate. And then the other area of focus has been on streamlining our processes and strategies with our ESG&A cost structure and those have a similar range of $15 million to $20 million of process related improvements that we expect to mine over that same period. A little bit more backend loaded there, where we will start to see some incremental improvements in 2017 and then a stronger improvement in 2018.

[Trey Groom:]

Okay that’s helpful. And as far as that second bucket there, the ESG&A piece. Have you made any progress on that yet or is that still all kind of on the come?

[Mark Johnson:]

No, we have made a lot of progress with that one. Within this current fiscal year 2016, we expect, we will have achieved about $6 million of that $15 million to $20 million. And that’s a little bit covered up by the fact that our operating performance has driven our incentive compensation costs up, they don’t see it quite as well, but it has more than offset inflation and incentive compensation accruals during the current year.

[Trey Groom:]

Got it. And then my second question is. I don’t know how much granularity you can give us on this. But Norm, if you could talk about what you are seeing in the Texas market specifically. Last night, there was some kind of shaky data that came out from the Texas Controller’s Office around cement shipments in July specifically in Texas. I know cement is obviously not your business, but a big chunk of cement does go into non-res. So I didn’t know, if you could maybe comment on what you are seeing there in Texas specifically from a demand standpoint.

[Norman Chambers:]

Yes, I mean we continue to see good business opportunities. We have had and I don’t know what the cement guys are talking about, but there certainly was a lot of rain, which is not great for cement business. But I will say that we are still very active, all our brands are showing great activity. In fact, we even saw a pickup in oil and gas, which was a little bit surprising, but it was a up about 2% and we don’t expect oil and gas to come back very strong, but it’s nice to see that it seems to be off the bottom.

[Trey Groom:]

Great, well superb helpful. Thanks a lot and good luck in the rest of the quarter.

[Norman Chambers:]

Great. Thank you.

[Operator:]

Thank you. [Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from the line of Brent Thielman with DA Davidson Company. Please proceed with your question.

[Brent Theilman:]

Hi, good morning.

[Norman Chambers:]

Good morning.

[Mark Johnson:]

Good morning.

[Brent Theilman:]

Norm, with the backlog up 10% at quarter end it doesn’t really appear there was a lot of pull forward at least by that measure. Is the comments around pull forward based more on what you have seen play out in terms of booking and quoting for August?

[Norman Chambers:]

No. The pull forward was strictly things we shipped in the third quarter. So when we look at bookings up, our bookings continue to be pretty good, it’s still a choppy kind of environment, but our bookings last week were very good. I mean we continue to do well in the market we have. It in our expectations aren’t above that to the extent we get opportunities we have really tried to exploit them.

[Brent Theilman:]

Okay, so that overall pace of order activity sort of sustained in August, is that fair?

[Norman Chambers:]

Yes, absolutely.

[Brent Theilman:]

All right. And then you are thinking about the building segment in particular, any signs in your internal bookings data or quoting that sort of indicates that industrial piece just been kind of a drag is flattening or sort of bottoming out?

[Norman Chambers:]

It’s interesting that when I look at that, I mean we still have seen our industrial part of our business has been certainly slower than we have seen in the past. But if you just look at kind of our core manufacturing and warehouse and storage, it’s just still a big chunk of business. You know it’s down a little bit, but it’s still a big part of our business and continue to be very good to us. But we have seen improvement in things like governmental, churches, retail was up, [indiscernible] are up, commercial freight is up. So again, we are generalists, so we tend to people that sell our products are generalists and therefore they go wherever the action is. So we always find that some things have a headwind and some things have a tailwinds and that’s kind of the nature of our business and that’s what we are used to dealing with. And if anything we are much better off with the speed and efficiency of being able to take advantage of whatever part of the market is showing growth.

[Brent Theilman:]

Okay. Thank you.

[Norman Chambers:]

You are welcome.

[Operator:]

Ms. Matthews there are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the floor back to you for final remarks.

[Norman Chambers:]

Well great. Well thank you very much for joining us and we look forward to speaking with you at the end of the fourth quarter.

[Operator:]

Thank you. This concludes today’s teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.