CSW Industrials, Inc.
Q4 2017 Earnings Call Transcript
Published:
- Operator:
- Greetings and welcome to CSW Industrials’ Fourth Quarter 2017 Earnings Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I’d now like to turn the conference over to Sarah Bicknell from ICR.
- Sarah Bicknell:
- Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone and welcome to CSW Industrials’ fiscal fourth quarter investor call. Joining me today are Joseph Armes, Chief Executive Officer of CSW Industrials; Gregg Branning, Chief Financial Officer; and Christopher Mudd, Chief Operating Officer. If you had not received the earnings release, it is available on our website at www.cswindustrials.com. This call is being recorded. A replay of today’s call will be available. Details on how to access the replay are in the earnings release. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results could materially differ because of factors discussed in today’s earnings release and the comments made during this call and in the Risk Factors section of our annual report on Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statements. This call will also include an analysis of adjusted operating income, net income and earnings per share, which are non-GAAP financial measures of performance. These non-GAAP measures should be used as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, operating income, net income and earnings per share computed in accordance with GAAP. For a more complete discussion of adjusted operating income, net income and earnings per share, see our earnings release. I will now turn the call over to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Joe Armes.
- Joseph Armes:
- Thank you, Sarah. Good morning, everyone and thank you for joining us on today’s call. I would like to begin our call with a few highlights from the quarter, discuss our outlook for 2018. Then, Gregg will take you through the financials and Chris will discuss the operational highlights for the quarter. We are pleased to report that we ended the year on a strong note with top line growth in all three segments. Revenue was up 14.5% at a consolidated level for the quarter on organic growth of 12.9%. Our fourth quarter adjusted earnings per diluted share were $0.43, which was up 22.9% compared to the prior year, led by a strong performance in our Industrial Products segment. Our consolidated operating results continue to be affected by challenging volume in rail and mining, but we see this pressure lessening in rail and a modest recovery in energy. For the full year and on a consolidated basis, our sales grew by 2.3%, including 0.6% organic growth during this period, while adjusted net income decreased by 1.3% to $26.7 million or $1.68 per diluted share. I would remind our investors that the prior year included only 6 months as a standalone company, which created a $0.21 headwind to our adjusted EPS and is not contemplated in our adjustment as it is recurring. As we close out our first full fiscal year as a public company, I wanted to take a few moments to recap the progress we have made since we spun out of Capital Southwest in September of 2015. Our business was comprised of 6 independent portfolio companies that all served industrial end markets, but were not integrated despite having a common owner. Our goal since the spin have been to integrate these disparate businesses into three business segments with enhanced efficiencies, leverage a stronger shared capital structure and execute attractive acquisitions in the end markets we serve to leverage our distribution channels. As part of this reorganization, our team took a critical look at opportunities for cost savings and footprint optimization. We identified several areas where we could rationalize our footprint and find cost savings and have been executing on this strategy. We view this as a two-step process
- Gregg Branning:
- Thanks, Joe and good morning, everyone. Consolidated revenue during the fourth quarter of 2017 increased 14.5% to $87.3 million compared to the prior year period of $76.3 million. Organic growth was 12.9% and acquisitions contributed 1.6% to total growth. The increase in revenue was primarily attributable to increases in architecturally specified building products and HVAC end markets, partially offset by decreases in rail. Looking at our segment level revenue and operating income, Industrial Products segment revenue was $41.6 million, up 22.7% compared to the prior year of $33.9 million. Higher revenue was driven by strong sales into architecturally specified products and HVAC end markets. Operating income increased to $8.4 million compared to the prior year of $6.3 million. Adjusted segment operating income increased 52.2% to $9.6 million compared to the prior year period of $6.3 million. Segment adjusted operating income as a percentage of sales improved to 23% compared to the prior year period of 18.5%. Coating Sealants & Adhesives segment revenue increased 5.3% to $26.7 million compared to the prior year of $25.3 million. Higher sales were attributable to new business associated with the company’s sales diversification efforts, partially offset by lower OEM rail volume and existing – with existing customers. Segment level operating loss was $59,000 compared to the prior year loss of $63,000. Adjusted to exclude nonrecurring costs primarily related to realignment and restructuring, segment operating income was $1.9 million compared to the prior year period of $424,000. Segment adjusted operating income as a percentage of sales improved to 7.3% compared to the prior year period of 1.7%. Now moving on to Specialty Chemicals, segment revenue was $19.1 million compared to the prior year of $16.9 million. Higher sales were primarily driven by improved Jet-Lube volume due to the increased rig count that Joe mentioned plus industrial lubes business in cement and power generation. Our reported segment operating loss was $817,000 compared to prior year period operating income of $3.1 million. Adjusted to exclude non-recurring costs, segment operating income decreased $2.4 million compared to $3.1 million in the prior year. Segment adjusted operating income as a percentage of sales was 12.6% compared to the prior year period of 18.1%. The lower profitability was due to the resolution of a customer issue in the fourth quarter and writing off some inventory, neither of which was related to the realignment and restructuring actions taken for this segment and therefore are not reflected in our adjusted results. Turning back to our consolidated results, consolidated gross profit in the fiscal fourth quarter of 2017 was $31.1 million, a 9.7% decrease compared to the prior year level of $34.4 million. Gross margin as a percentage of sales was 35.6% compared to 45.1% in the prior year period. Lower gross margin compared to the prior year reflected increased costs related to realignment and restructuring as the company improves its operational footprint. In total, we incurred $5.3 million in realignment and restructuring costs during the period. Consolidated operating expenses decreased 4.6% to $26.4 million or 30.2% of sales compared to the prior year level of $26.7 million or 36.2% of sales. Lower operating costs compared to the prior year were primarily attributable to reduced salaries and benefits in the quarter. Consolidated operating income for the fourth quarter was $4.7 million or 5.4% of sales compared to $6.8 million or 8.9% of sales in the prior year. Adjusted operating income was $11.1 million, a 39.8% increase compared to the prior year period of $8 million. Consolidated net income was $2.7 million or $0.17 per diluted share compared to $1.9 million or $0.12 per diluted share in fiscal 2016. Adjusting to exclude one-time expenses and applying a normalized tax rate, adjusted net income in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 was up 23.5% to $6.9 million or $0.43 per diluted share compared to $5.6 million or $0.35 per diluted share in the prior period. Our net debt at quarter end was $48.3 million and we closed the quarter with $24.9 million of cash on our balance sheet and had $239 million of borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility, which provides ample flexibility to fund our growth and acquisition strategy. Now I will turn the call over to Chris.
- Christopher Mudd:
- Thanks Gregg. I would like to begin today by touching on some of our operational achievements in fiscal 2017 and their implications to fiscal 2018. Beginning with Industrial Products, this segment had exceptionally strong year as HVAC and architecturally specified building products contributed double digit sales growth during the year. We are pleased with the Greco acquisition and it is performing ahead of our expectations. Our pipeline in this business also looks favorable as this market offers good visibility based on the long lead times from project award to build dates, similar to our other architecturally specified product offering. As part of the integration of Greco, we conducted a two day commercial meeting with our sales and marketing leaders and implemented a significant improvement in our sales efforts. During these meetings, we identified similar sales processes for Balco and RectorSeal fire stopping products and also, Smoke Guard and Greco products based on placement in the engineering timeline with our customers. As a result, we have now combined sales efforts for Balco and RectorSeal fire stopping products and we also coordinated the Smoke Guard and Greco sales teams. This reorganization occurred to drive improved cross-selling opportunities and we have already identified – we have already begun to see the positive impact of this in our business. In addition, we identified several geographic differences and penetration rates between products and we expect these changes will help capture higher and more consistent share across regions. Moving to the reorganization and footprint optimization efforts, the Whitmore and Jet-Lube consolidation has been completed on schedule and as a result, we expect to begin to realize the gross annual run rate savings that we had previously disclosed. This includes an incremental benefit beginning in the first quarter as our lease on the Houston facility rolled off at the end of the last fiscal year. Bringing all volume under one roof and launching product manufacturing in the Rockwall facility was challenging and it consumed substantial resources during fiscal 2017. As we turn to the new fiscal year, we are working to reduce the complexities associated with the Rockwall integration, with the by-product of this driving improved efficiencies as we streamline the process and reduce SKUs. We expect it will take some time to fully optimize our operations and we – and then recognized the full net savings, which is our primary objective for fiscal 2018. Turning to the Strathmore footprint consolidation, we exited the expensive coatings tolling arrangement in Houston as of the year end and we are in the process of completing the relocation of the volume from our Syracuse, New York facility to Longview, Texas and Acworth, Georgia. This is expected to be completed by the end of June 2017. We decided to delay this closure by one quarter for two primary reasons; first, production setup and training times for certain products have taken a little longer than expected and second, we received some pre-buy activity ahead of these facility moves and as a result, we believe it was prudent to leave a little extra time to ensure a seamless transition for our customers. With that, I will turn it back over to Joe for closing remarks.
- Joseph Armes:
- Thank you, Chris. In closing, we are very pleased with how we finished this year and are highly focused on driving growth, profitability in all of our business segments. We had diversified our revenue base while rationalizing costs. As we look to the year ahead, we are confident in our strategy and encouraged by the trends we have been observing in our end markets and believe we are taking the right steps to deliver long-term sustainable value for our shareholders. I would like to take this opportunity to thank all of my colleagues here at CSW Industrials as we continue to serve our customers and steward well the capital entrusted to us by our shareholders. Thank you for your interest in CSW Industrials. Operator, we are now ready to take questions.
- Operator:
- Thank you. At this time we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] Our first question is from the line of Jon Tanwanteng with CJS. Please proceed with your question.
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Could you talk a little bit more about the Greco acquisition, can you quantify maybe what the opportunities look like from a revenue and cross-selling synergy standpoint and if there are any potential cost saving synergies?
- Joseph Armes:
- Yes. Let me start with that, Jon. Greco has a great line of products and fits really well within our product portfolio. However, there are not a lot of significant cost savings here. This is a cross-selling and product extension, product line extension acquisition, and so the integration process is simple in that regard. We are not closing any facilities of integrating any production, and so the opportunity really is here on the top line. And as we said, we are really pleased with the way that they have folded into our sales organization. Cross-selling has begun and Greco’s kind of existing legacy business, if you will, is performing very, very well in the early months here.
- Christopher Mudd:
- This is Chris. Greco has very strong relationships with architects and specifiers across Canada. And of course, our Smoke Guard business primarily is a U.S. based business. And so combining those cross-selling efforts is really going to help us to promote Smoke Guard products in Canada and to promote the Greco products into the U.S. market, especially the West Coast. So that’s part of the cross-selling is to help geographically diversify both Smoke Guard and Greco’s sales.
- Joseph Armes:
- As far as quantifying that, Jon, Greco’s had kind of a historical growth rate of 9% or so. And so that’s a really nice growth rate. However, we are hopeful that the cross-selling opportunities will allow us to drive that even higher.
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Great, that’s very helpful. And just a little more color on the rail markets, what are the chances of real recovery here in the next 12 months and maybe break that down between the coatings and the lubricants side?
- Christopher Mudd:
- Sure. This is Chris. We are still not seeing much of an uptick on the railcar OEM side. And even on the refurbishment, things are still pretty slow. So for coatings, as Joe mentioned, we are still seeing a lack of recovery there. On the lubricants side, there might be some signs for optimism. We had reported in the past about Class I railroads choosing to not lubricate the track just to save money. We are seeing a little bit of improvement there and a little bit more spend on applicator equipment. So maybe some signs of optimism on the lubricant and applicator side.
- Gregg Branning:
- Although that’s primarily with a new customer where we picked up some share gain, so the existing customers have continued to remain flat.
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Got it, okay. And just a quick update on the new CSA customers you have been adding. Are you seeing opportunities to move the margin up with those either new products or how you sell into them?
- Gregg Branning:
- Not yet.
- Joseph Armes:
- Not yet. And those are more industrial applications, Jon, and those are going to be a little more transactional, not as highly specified as our base business. And so that’s a business that’s nice to have, given the current kind of weakness in the other markets. But longer term, we want to be more heavily focused on the highly specified applications.
- Gregg Branning:
- This is Gregg. And those highly specified applications, as I think we have said before, those are a longer sales cycle. We are getting products out in the field for testing to be qualified. The team’s working hard to drive those but they continue to take time.
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Got it. Thanks. And also just wondering, how do you expect corporate expenses to trend in ‘18 versus ‘17, given all the one-times and other things that have been going on?
- Gregg Branning:
- Yes, Jon, this is Gregg again. We would expect them to be up probably a couple million dollars in total. That’s going to be driven by a couple of different things
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Okay, got it. And then finally, just how do you see the pipeline for further M&A valuations, the number of opportunities, all that good stuff, if you could?
- Joseph Armes:
- Yes. Jon, we are continuing to push hard for filling the funnel with opportunities. We are absolutely committed to growing through acquisitions but doing that in a disciplined way. And so Greco was a fantastic opportunity for us, a compelling opportunity, and so we were able to get that one closed. We do have several acquisitions that we are looking at, at this time but valuation, as you said, is always a gating item here. And we have got to find the right opportunity and continue to be disciplined, so nothing to report though.
- Jon Tanwanteng:
- Okay, great. Thank you very much.
- Joseph Armes:
- Thank you, Jon.
- Operator:
- Our next question is from the line of Liam Burke with Wunderlich. Please go ahead with your question.
- Liam Burke:
- Yes, thank you. Good morning. On the Jet-Lube Whitmore consolidation, it looks like the plant – the operational piece has been consolidated. You can move along with fine-tuning or improving the operations. In terms of the sales effort and combining or cross-selling Jet-Lube and Whitmore products, how is that progressing?
- Christopher Mudd:
- Yes, I mean – Liam, this is Chris. That – we are continuing to make progress, and it’s really the Whitmore and Jet-Lube and Deacon products are all being promoted by the same sales team through distribution as well as, in some cases, direct. And we have really merged those sales groups together. They work as a team. It allows us to have a broader product offering to distributors. It allows us to get into new regions where we have had some growth with lubricants and sealants in Asia and Latin America. So I think it’s coming along as expected. And we have got one leader over that whole group and one sales team that’s driving all those different products in the market.
- Liam Burke:
- And just keeping on that note, you mentioned sort of fine-tuning the SKU count now that everything’s been combined. How long do you think that process will take?
- Gregg Branning:
- This is Gregg. I think as we mentioned, both SKU count as well as some inefficiencies, we will continue to see some of those inefficiencies here in the first quarter. We would like to think that most of them will be behind us. But clearly, as I think Joe and Chris both talked in our prepared remarks, we have seen the gross savings but we have seen inefficiencies, the deal with both the SKUs as well as packaging going Whitmore, as I think you remember on your trips, Whitmore packages very large quantities, Jet-Lube package is small. And so that’s created some inefficiencies within the business all under one roof.
- Liam Burke:
- Sure. And then Gregg, just a quick question on working capital, it might just be timing but the accounts receivable balance was higher however you want to mention it from a year ago while the inventory levels relatively flat?
- Gregg Branning:
- Right, right. So, on the accounts receivable, two things. One was timing due to the strong sales within the HVAC markets within our Industrial Products as those sales went up over 20% that drove higher receivables. And the other factor would be the Greco acquisition. Obviously, they were not in – their receivables were not in our balances last year and they are this year. And then inventory, we have begun trying to work down inventory. We have a supply chain leader at each of our sites, and we have supply chain leader for one of the overseas, our steering committee, and so that is something we have talked about this past year, and we are focused on and trying to work that. We will continue to try and drive those down. The other thing that really didn’t come out in the call that factors into some of this or in our prepared remarks is that we did see the procurement savings that we have been talking about this past year. That did roll through our financials. We saw roughly $2 million of savings here in the back half of the year and that has made its way through. And so that certainly has helped our inventory levels.
- Liam Burke:
- Great. Thank you very much.
- Operator:
- [Operator Instructions] Gentlemen, there are no additional questions at this time.
- Joseph Armes:
- Great. Well, we would just like to say thank you everyone for participating in our call today. We look forward to speaking to you again soon. Thank you for your support.
- Operator:
- Thank you this concludes today’s conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Other CSW Industrials, Inc. earnings call transcripts:
- Q4 (2024) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2024) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2024) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2024) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2023) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2023) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2023) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2023) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2022) CSWI earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2022) CSWI earnings call transcript