ICF International, Inc.
Q2 2013 Earnings Call Transcript

Published: 2 Aug 2013

[Operator:]

Welcome to the ICF International Second Quarter 2013 Conference Call. [Operator Instructions] As a reminder, this conference is being recorded on Thursday, August 1, 2013, and cannot be reproduced or rebroadcast without permission from the company. And now I would like to turn the program over to Douglas Beck, Senior Vice President, Corporate Development. Please go ahead, sir.

[Douglas Beck:]

Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us to review ICF's second quarter 2013 performance. With us today from ICF International are Sudhakar Kesavan, Chairman and CEO; John Wasson, President and COO; and James Morgan, CFO. During this conference call, we will make forward-looking statements to assist you in understanding ICF management's expectations about our future performance. These statements are subject to a number of risks that could cause actual events and results to differ materially, and I refer you to our August 1, 2013, release and our SEC filings for discussions of those risks. In addition, our statements during this call are based on our views as of today. We anticipate that future developments will cause our views to change. Please consider the information presented in that light. We may, at some point, elect to update the forward-looking statements made today but specifically disclaim any obligation to do so. I will now turn the call over to our CEO, Sudhakar Kesavan, to discuss the second quarter. Sudhakar?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Thank you, Doug. This was another quarter of solid performance for ICF. Total revenue growth was driven by our commercial and non-U.S. government business, similar trends to those of this year's first quarter. Commercial energy efficiency work continues to be a major growth driver, up 21.3% in the second quarter and 15.6% for the first half. We're executing well on more than 125 contracts in 29 states, which we believe makes up the market leader in residential energy efficiency programs, and we're gaining ground in the commercial industrial sector as well. The initial term of our energy efficiency contract is generally for 2 to 3 years, plus option years, which helps smooth out the lumpiness that is inherent in our commercial work. Our commercial business increased 3.3% in the second quarter and 8.2% for the first half of 2013. As we have mentioned in previous quarters, we have a large commercial infrastructure project that entered a slower phase of construction at the end of 2012. Excluding that project, commercial revenues increased 7.4% in the second quarter and 10.4% for the first half. This contract was recently extended so that our work on this project continues through the beginning of 2015. We expect to see an uptick on work on this project in this year's fourth quarter. Our international government business also grew strongly in the second quarter, up 23.6% year-on-year. The biggest gain we have as a result of the GHK acquisition that closed at the end of February last year has given us the ability to pursue more and larger RFPs by combining ICF's proven business development processes with the subject matter knowledge and experience of GHK. As a result, we have been able to increase both building proposal volumes and win rates. We have won 3 large contracts in Europe since the GHK acquisition. This is a good illustration of how we use the ICF acquisition platform to create additional value similar to our success with other acquisitions. Our federal government business was virtually flat in the second quarter and down 1.4% for the first half, which we believe compares well within the government services sector. This performance results from our long-standing reputation in markets that have remained relatively resilient such as health, energy and infrastructure. Our state and local business revenue comparison, however, reflected the unevenness associated with large infrastructure projects again. Consequently, state and local revenues are down 8.3% in the second quarter and 13.4% in the first half, but we expect to see better comparisons in the second half of the year when several projects are scheduled to ramp up. Net income and diluted earnings per share were flat with last year's second quarter, but operating income declined as a result of a number of factors specific to the second quarter. James Morgan, our CFO, will speak more about that in his remarks. Yesterday, we completed a strategically important tuck-in acquisition of an e-commerce technology services firm with roughly $10 million in annual revenue. You may recall that last year, we combined the Ironworks acquisition of ICF's legacy web development and strategic communications businesses, and our cross-selling initiative had resulted in new planned engagements. This most recent acquisition add capabilities with a leading e-commerce platform, which we expect to initially offer to our commercial clients and ultimately to our government clients as well. Acquisitions remain a key element of ICF's strategy. Our pipeline remains robust, and we continue to review opportunities that have the potential to accelerate our growth in key markets and be accretive to earnings. ICF ended the first half with an overall book-to-bill ratio of nearly 1.0, which we consider solid performance based on market conditions in the federal states. Second quarter sales were up 16%, in line with our comments on last quarter's call that RFP and federal government award activity will pick up from Q1's low levels. Our commercial book-to-bill ratio was 1.19 for the first half, which points to the continued growth of our commercial business in the second half of the year and its increasing contribution to our business mix. We are optimistic about our sales in the second half of the year, which we believe will be significantly ahead of this year's first half. This will set us up well for continued growth in 2014. In summary, second quarter results were similar to those of the first quarter, which was in line with our expectation. Our diversified business model provides the visibility of a large backlog, together with the upside of growing commercial and international businesses. We believe this positions ICF to continue to do well. Now I would like to turn the call over to John Wasson, ICF's COO, who will provide additional comments on operating highlights.

[John Wasson:]

Thank you, Sudhakar, and good afternoon. As Sudhakar noted, this was a good quarter for contract wins. We are especially pleased that federal sales picked up significantly and are now on a year-to-date basis at a level similar to last year, despite a slow first quarter, leading up to the sequester on March 1. Our biggest win in Q2 was a $72 million contract that we have held at the National Institutes of Health for the past 5 years to provide health informatics support to the mission-critical NIH electronic Research Administration's grant management systems. This win was an excellent example of our ability to combine best-in-class health informatics and a deep understanding of the scientific research community to provide critical support in administering more than 60,000 grants totaling $30 billion annually. Also, among our nearly 100 federal awards was a large contract to provide up to $34 million in program and IT management services to assist the U.S. Postal Service in making their mail processing as efficient as possible and maintaining performance measurement metrics to assist in the work. And we continue our support for the Center for Disease Control's National Adult Tobacco Survey with a $7.8 million contract. In fact, we won 11 contracts in excess of $1 million in each of our 3 major markets, focusing on health and human services, energy and environment and public safety and defense, reflecting our diversified value-added portfolio in the federal space. Our state and local sales grew considerably, putting them well above second quarter and first half levels of a year ago, thanks to a number of new project wins in the infrastructure management arena. Recovery from Superstorm Sandy in the mid-Atlantic was another area in which we won more, now that the affected states have received funding. Before this quarter, we had been awarded a few federal and commercial projects to assist with preparing the allocation of funds to state and local governments for recovery purposes. In Q2, however, we won a competitive procurement in excess of $10 million to help one of the states with analytical and program support for their disaster recovery programs, and we are continuing to track several large state and local opportunities across the region in environmental, housing and infrastructure recovery issues that we will be bidding in the coming months. Lastly, in the government space, we are continuing to see sales growth versus a year ago with the international governments, particularly with the U.K. government and the European Commission at the integration of ICF and GHK gains momentum. Last quarter, we announced the $5 million energy efficiency contract with the U.K. Department of Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. For this quarter, there were numerous wins in the areas of social and energy policy. Most noteworthy was an award of an $8.9 million contract with the European Commission to provide employment program support for the relevant directorate known as Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion. We expect to announce another significant contract win with U.K. government in the next couple of weeks. We believe that there are significant opportunities ahead to leverage our combined assets to gain a greater presence in the European market. On the commercial side, our sales this past quarter were broadly distributed across all of our key commercial markets. The larger individual commercial sales in excess of $1 million were spread among energy efficiency for utilities, strategic communications for national nonprofit, environmental studies for our Latin American petroleum services company, helping to manage the fitting out of a new generation of aircraft for a major U.S. airline and interactive data application support with another national organization. Looking forward, our pipeline continues to grow across all of our markets. The total pipeline clearly stands at $3.6 billion compared with $3 billion at the end of the first quarter. Nearly 1/2 of the $600 million sequential growth was in our commercial pipeline, and we have devoted considerable resources to strengthening our business development efforts. We see significant opportunities in our areas of expertise and are investing our resources to take advantage of these opportunities. This pipeline growth also translated into an increased number of large contracts that we're actively pursuing, 64 greater than $10 million and 26 greater than $25 million. Finally, this pipeline growth has also resulted in an over 70% increase in the dollar value of opportunities and the proposals submitted in awaiting award stage at the end of July 2013 versus a year ago. Finally, our turnover is again low at 2.5% for the quarter, and results for the first half translate into an annual rate of 9.6%. Now I would like to turn the call over to our CFO, James Morgan. James?

[James C. Morgan:]

Thanks, John. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm pleased to report our second quarter 2013 financial results. Revenue for the second quarter of 2013 was $241.6 million, an increase of 0.8% compared to the prior year. As mentioned previously by Sudhakar, the year-over-year increase was driven by our commercial revenues, which were up 3.3% from the second quarter of 2012. Government revenues were stable with last year's second quarter. In the first half of the year, revenue was $475.5 million, up 1.8% over the prior year period, driven by an increase in commercial revenue of 8.2%. Excluding the impact of GHK, which was acquired in February of 2012, organic revenue for the first half increased 0.4% and organic revenue for the commercial clients increased by 7.5%. Gross profit margin was 37.3% for the second quarter, down from the 38.3% in the second quarter of 2012 and was 38.1% for the first half of 2013 compared to 38.4% for the first half of 2012. Gross margin in the second quarter was impacted by a higher percentage of revenues from subcontractor activity, which negatively impacted gross margins, operating income and EBITDA margins by approximately 50 basis points each. We continue to anticipate that gross margins will be within 38% to 39% for the full year of 2013 compared to 37.8% in 2012, reflecting the increased contribution of our commercial business. Indirect and selling expenses were up slightly at $0.2 million, inclusive of $0.3 million in acquisition-related charges, reflecting our ongoing efforts to effectively manage indirect and selling expenses. Our EBITDA margin was 9.3%, down from 10.2% in last year's second quarter and 9.5% for the first half, down from 9.8% in last year's first half. As mentioned previously, second quarter EBITDA margin was negatively impacted by approximately 50 basis points due to higher subcontractor activity. For the full year, we have narrowed our EBITDA margin guidance to between 9.5% and 10%, reflecting our first half performance, as well as likely investments that we will make in the second half of the year to support our expected sales growth. Depreciation and amortization expense was $2.8 million, similar to prior levels and in line with our projections for the full year. Amortization of purchased intangibles was $2.4 million in the second quarter of 2013, down from $3.5 million in the second quarter of last year. The decrease in year-over-year amortization expense is primarily due to the reduced amortization of intangible assets related to the acquisition of Ironworks and Macro. Operating income in the second quarter was $17.3 million, a decrease of 5.3% over last year's second quarter. The year-over-year decrease is primarily due to our mix of business in the second quarter, which we expect to become more favorable in the second half of the year. Operating income margin was 7.2% compared to 7.6% on last year's second quarter of 2012 and was 7.3% for the first half of 2013 as compared to 7.4% for the first half of 2012. The effective tax rate was 38% as compared to 40% reported in the second quarter of 2012. Continue to expect the full year effective tax rate for 2013 to be no more than 39%. For both the second quarter of 2013 and 2012, net income was $10.3 million and diluted EPS was $0.52, but this year's EPS included $0.3 million in acquisition-related expenses. For the first half of 2013, net income was $20.4 million and diluted EPS was $1.02, up 6% over the first half of 2012. We paid down an additional $11.7 million of debt during Q2, resulting in long-term debt of $75 million at the end of the quarter. In the first half of 2013, we have paid down $30 million of debt. Cash flow from operating activities was $30.3 million for the first half of 2013, an increase over the $28.4 million reported in last year's first half. Days sales outstanding for the quarter, including the impact of deferred revenue, decreased to 69 days from 71 days at December 31, 2012. As we have stated in the past, we expect our DSOs to be within the 70- to 75-day range at year end. Our capital expenditures for the first half was $7.2 million and in line with our expectations. To sum up, we reaffirm our full year expectations for certain 2013 line items that we have provided during our last earnings call 3 months ago, which were amortization of intangibles of $9.5 million to $10 million, depreciation and amortization expense of $12 million to $12.5 million, capital expenditures of $15.5 million to $16.5 million, interest expense of $2.5 million to $3 million and fully diluted weighted average shares of approximately 20 million for the year. Likewise, we continue to expect to have cash flow from operating activities of at least $70 million. With that, I would like to turn the call back over to Sudhakar.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Thank you, James. As you can see from our earnings release, we have raised the midpoints of our guidance ranges for full year 2013 revenue and diluted EPS based on our expectations that the second half performance would exceed that of the first half. Our range for revenue now stands at $955 million to $975 million, as we expect to see continued growth in commercial business and the ramp-up of government contracts in the second half. We narrowed our EBITDA margin range to 9.5% to 10%. We also narrowed our diluted EPS guidance range to $2.02 to $2.10. At the midpoint, this would equate to year-over-year growth of almost 8% in diluted EPS on about a 3% revenue increase. These estimates are based on our current portfolio exclusive of any additional acquisitions. Operator, at this point, I'd like to open the call to questions.

[Operator:]

[Operator Instructions] And our first question comes from Bill Loomis with Stifel.

[William R. Loomis:]

Looking at the commercial business, your awards in commercial in the first quarter were very, very strong, but it looks like there was no sequential growth from first to second quarter in commercial. Why is that? And what do you -- what's going to change that in the second half?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Well, Bill, we had a very strong first quarter. We said in that call that we expect the government work to crank up in the second quarter, and commercial is sort of lumpy, but we do have a very strong pipeline. Going forward, for the second half of the year, which we mentioned, it's 70% higher than what it was at this time last year. Our book-to-bill ratio for the first half is 1.19, so that's a pretty good, healthy number for first half commercial. And so we think that we will continue to have similar book-to-bill ratio going forward, and we see that the pipeline is strong and these proposals submitted are very strong. So we cannot predict with certainty as to when people decide, but we certainly have lots of stuff in the pipeline.

[William R. Loomis:]

Okay. And what you won in the first quarter, you're seeing that ramp up. Is that fully effective in the second quarter? Or that hasn't contributed that much yet?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

I think it will contribute in the second half of the year. Some of it is ramped -- some of it started off and some of it is going to start ramping up. So that is why I stated that I'm optimistic about the second half of the year in terms of our performance.

[William R. Loomis:]

And on the commercial -- I'm sorry, the international government, because you just give the percentage in the tables, I'm sure we got around the errors, but did I hear you say it was up, what, 26% or something year-over-year? Was a -- or 24%. Was that a year-over-year number?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Yes.

[William R. Loomis:]

Okay. And how do you see that in the second half based on the wins you've had? Did the large wins ramp up fully in the quarter? Or are they going to contribute more in the second half?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

The wins will start contributing in the second half. We think that the prospects are pretty good in the European context, and these contracts we've won will ramp up in the second half, which is why I think, again, there's a certain sense of momentum we have in that business.

[Operator:]

Our next question comes from Tim McHugh with William Blair.

[Timothy McHugh:]

I guess, first, just the improvement in the second half with bookings, I guess, do you have a sense for what you might expect for an overall book-to-bill for the year at this point? You clearly sound more positive about the potential for bookings in the second half, but I guess I'm trying to get a sense for what we might be able to end up with for the full year.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Well, I think the -- my sense is that we are optimistic because of the fact that the 2 or 3 metrics I mentioned, one was the fact that our pipeline is up $600 million from what it was last year. If you look at the -- what we have in terms of the bids submitted this year, that's 70% higher than where it was last year. And that's a big number for us. And all the numbers are pretty big here. So I would suggest that the book-to-bill ratio should certainly be, if our government book-to-bill is 1 and this one is 1.19, somewhere greater than 1 is, I think, a reasonable estimate to make going forward. So I think that that's what I think it will be.

[Timothy McHugh:]

Okay. And then I guess, just the comment about expecting a better half -- better second half of the year, it seems like you if you just kind of repeat the first half of the year, you get that's what's in the guidance range. So I'm just trying to replicate that. If I take just the EBITDA you've done so far, that gets you to the middle of the range. So is that just conservatism in the range you've given? I'm trying to compare your qualitative statements with the numbers.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Yes. If you look at the first half, we get $1.02 and the midpoint is about $2.06, so we are expected to do $1.04.

[Timothy McHugh:]

Okay. I guess I was looking more at the EBITDA, but that's fair. And then I guess, just the acquisition pipeline, can you talk a little bit about what you're seeing out there and, I guess, how aggressively you might be pursuing that at this point?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

We're seeing a greater interest at the moment, at least in the things which we have an interest in, in the -- in following the business services, commercial business services arena. And we are seeing some larger companies, we are seeing some smaller companies, so I think it's a good mix of companies we are seeing in all the areas, in energy, in technology, in health. So we're pursuing them actively, and we are certainly -- as I have said before, we cannot predict when and if we will close any, but we certainly are quite active on this one.

[Operator:]

And our next question comes from Edward Caso with Wells Fargo.

[Richard Eskelsen:]

It's Rick Eskelsen on for Ed. The first question was just on the people count and sort of the attrition numbers. The attrition numbers continue to be low, but you had the uptick in the subcontractor usage. So maybe if you could talk about whether you're having any problems finding the right skill sets or if this is just kind of a timing issue or something on projects you're working on. And then more broadly, how are you finding it in terms of getting the talent that you need?

[John Wasson:]

Yes. No, I don't think we've seen any change in our ability to find the talent, recruit the talent that we need. I think as we've talked about in past calls, we have a robust recruiting engine, so we're certainly not having any problems finding the talent, recruiting the talent and retaining the talent. I really don't see any shift or change in that environment. I think that it's reflected in our low turnover rates.

[Richard Eskelsen:]

And the subcontractor was just kind of skills mix during the quarter?

[John Wasson:]

Yes, that was just the nature of the work and the specific contracts that we're working on in the public sector space. That wasn't -- so I don't think there was anything unusual that we were shifting work to subcontractors that we would otherwise have done. That was just the nature of the work and just do the work that we have between ourselves and the subs on those contracts.

[Richard Eskelsen:]

Okay, great. And then on the Sandy opportunities, how big could this potentially be for you in terms of revenue? And how long typically are the projects -- how long do they last with sort of the tail on them?

[John Wasson:]

Yes, I think as we said in the conference call in March, I mean, we've won 1 contract that's certainly going to be north of $10 million. I think we have several opportunities in our pipeline in the range of $10 million to $50 million. And so -- and those contracts typically go for 2 to 3 years with the possibility of extension. So I mean, these are sizable, potentially sizable contracts that could -- that would be material over the next 2 to 3 years if we're successful in winning them.

[Richard Eskelsen:]

Then the last one for me, just on the commercial area, and particularly in the IT work that you guys do. What are you seeing from discretionary spending by clients? We're hearing of some data points elsewhere that companies are feeling maybe a little bit better and freeing up spending a bit more. Are you seeing that as well?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Yes, I think that in certain sectors, we are seeing it quite -- which are growing quite rapidly. In certain other sectors, it is slower because we have 3 or 4 verticals in our commercial space which we work in. So it depends on the vertical. In the health arena, for example, if they're robust and it's growing very nicely in some of the -- in 1 or of the other areas like, for example, there's a nonprofit vertical that is not growing as rapidly as we would like. So I think it depends on the specific industry and looking at -- I mean, specific vertical you're looking at.

[Operator:]

And our next question comes from George Price with BB&T Capital Markets. [Operator Instructions]

[George A. Price:]

Actually, a good segue off of Rick's question. Just you talked about the increase in the commercial pipeline, 70%, and that was pipeline, I believe. I apologize, I was little late getting on, if I misheard that, please let me know. But that's a nice increase. Can you maybe call out any particular areas or industries or services that you've expanded into that are behind that increase? Just trying to get some more color on what kind of work you're increasingly going after in commercial.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

So let me just make sure that you understand. The 70% increase is in the bids submitted overall for the company, the pipeline...

[George A. Price:]

Oh, that was overall, I'm sorry.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Overall, as compared to last year at this time, July 31 last year versus July 31 this year, that is awaiting award, contract awaiting award. So that is basically what that 70% applied to. So we are seeing an increase in energy efficiency, in health, in -- some in aviation of -- in the -- in -- I think those are the 3 broad areas where we are seeing a significant increase. And I think I would emphasize that in the commercial, industrial arena in energy efficiency where we have a small market share, we are seeing a very significant increase. So there is -- we're optimistic about the fact that we have good business in the residential energy efficiency arena and now we are starting off trying to expand our work in the commercial, industrial energy efficiency arena, which is clearly a larger market where we have a much smaller share.

[George A. Price:]

Okay, okay. And just more on the government side, I guess, looking into -- as we go into the back half of the year, how do you see the government award flow likely playing out, given all the puts and takes in the environment? Just throw that out there, in terms of a year-end budget flush.

[John Wasson:]

Yes, well, I think as we said in the remarks and in the press release, I mean, obviously, the second quarter sales for government, we saw a significant improvement. And I think they were strong. I think we continue to see very robust proposal activity in our federal markets. I think we expect strong sales to remain in Q3 and as we get to the end of the government fiscal year. And frankly, the pipeline for the back half of the year is quite strong, including in the federal space. I think we continue to see strong opportunities and have a strong pipeline.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

And I think I said in my remarks that the second half of the year, we think that the sale will be significantly greater than the first half of the year. And we think that it will be both in federal and commercial. So based on what we know about sequestration, the way it affected us and what we know about the future, we base -- and currently what we know, that is our assessment of sales and award activity going forward. So I think given that we -- I'm saying that I'm aware of the fact that sequestration has taken an impact and the fact that some clients have indicated a little bit here and there in terms of it. Despite that, we think that the sales activity will go up in Q3 and in Q4.

[George A. Price:]

Okay. And the last one, just kind of a housekeeping question, you discussed the ECA acquisition. So that's about, I guess, in the second half, the contribution for '13 is about $5 million in revenue?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

It will be slightly less than $5 million because August onwards, it will be 5/12 of 10 [ph].

[Operator:]

[Operator Instructions] Our next question comes from Tobey Sommer with SunTrust.

[Frank Atkins:]

This is Frank in for Tobey. I wanted to ask a little bit more about ECA. Can you give us any insight in terms of growth rate or margins or kind of how that fits with the rest of the business strategically?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Sure. I think that, if you recall, the Ironworks business was combined with our legacy web development business and the communications business we have. So what we are trying to set up is sort of an enterprise -- content management and enterprise e-commerce sort of business where basically you can do -- you can help clients develop their web presence and also help clients set up their e-commerce activities once they set up their web content management on the web which tells you what you can buy, then you can help them -- help people take it out -- help them buy on the web. So we did the first half very well, setting everything up, managing the content, et cetera, and we had significant expertise in a variety of platforms, which are used for content management. But we lacked the e-commerce platform to join their content management with the e-commerce business so as to provide the full life cycle of e-commerce website with somebody who would want -- a sophisticated client would want. So this piece adds that last element of it, which gives us the ability to go to market with the full life cycle solutions, and the company basically is very experienced in what is called the Hybris platform, e-commerce platform, which is one of the most popular e-commerce platforms at the moment. And we think that they have a pretty strong client set. Their margins are quite strong in the 10% to 15% EBITDA range. And they have very good relationships with the company which has developed the platform. They have a very good client set, and we believe that we can sell more to those clients who are restricted in using ECA because of its size. So I think that given the skill sets we have and given the fact that we have this capability now and given that we have -- traditionally have the content management expertise, we can go to the clients that we have, which are in the Fortune 500 and tell them that we can do much larger projects. And the clients will be much more comfortable with us doing larger projects because of the fact that we are much larger company and therefore has the financial wherewithal to potentially do it right and make sure that we are more reliable in terms of delivery. So I think that, that is why we think that this is very good fit and will give us access to a whole set of client sets who potentially want to set up these e-commerce sites and combine our expertise with them. So I think it's -- that's why I call it strategic because we think that it has a lot of pull-through potential.

[Frank Atkins:]

Great, that's helpful. And I wanted to ask about, in your prepared remarks and the press release, you talked about the commercial infrastructure project that's currently slower phase of construction. Do you expect that to return to a faster phase of construction soon? Or should there be a ramp back up in the second half?

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Yes. As I said, in Q4 -- it will continue at a slightly slower pace in Q3, but it will ramp up in Q4. And as I said in my remarks, the contract was extended through the beginning of 2015. We cannot predict what exactly 2014 will look like. But given that they're extended and given that it'll ramp-up in Q4, we're hoping that once it ramps up, it will stay up there. But we will certainly keep you apprised as that happens.

[Frank Atkins:]

Okay, great. And my last question is kind of on pricing. Are you seeing any pricing pressure as more folks are looking at the commercial side or the government continues to be under pressure?

[John Wasson:]

I think, as we have discussed before, I think that the primary area we've seen price pressure is in the DoD and intelligence arenas, which are, as I have discussed, 5% or 6% of our total revenues and I think we've been talking about that consistently for several quarters. Other than that, I don't think we've seen any unusual -- anything unusual in the pricing environment or any unusual change. It's obviously competitive, but in our civilian and commercial markets we've seen no material changes in pricing or the pricing pressure we're under.

[Operator:]

And we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back to management for closing comments.

[Sudhakar Kesavan:]

Well, thank you very much for your participation in today's call. We look forward to speaking with you again after the release of the third quarter numbers. Thank you very much again.

[Operator:]

And thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.