MedAvail Holdings, Inc.
Q2 2021 Earnings Call Transcript

Published:

  • Operator:
    Hello everyone and welcome to the MedAvail's 2021 Second Quarter Earnings Conference Call. My name is Bettany and I will be coordinating this call for you today. I will now hand the call over your host Caroline Paul, Investor Relations, to begin. Caroline over to you.
  • Caroline Paul:
    Thank you and thank you all for participating in today’s call. Joining me are Ed Kilroy, Chief Executive Officer; and Brian Schlerf, Interim Chief Financial Officer and Corporate Controller. Earlier today, MedAvail Holdings released financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2021. A copy of the press release is available on the company’s website. Before we begin, I’d like to remind you that management will make statements during this call that include forward-looking statements within the meaning of federal securities laws, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained in this call that relate to expectations or predictions of future events, results, or performance or similar statements are forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements, including without limitation, those relating to our operating trends and future financial performance, the impact of COVID-19 on our business and prospects for recovery, expense management, expectations for hiring, growth in our organization and reimbursement, market opportunity and expansion and guidance for revenue, gross margin and operating expenses in 2021 are based upon our current estimates and various assumptions. Also, management may make additional forward-looking statements in response to your question. These statements involve material risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or events to materially differ from those anticipated or implied by these forward-looking statements and do not guarantee future performance. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on these statements and should not rely on them and making an investment decision without considering the risks associated with such statements. For a list and description of the risks and uncertainties associated with our business, please refer to the Risk Factors section in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, SEC, on March 31, 2021. This conference call contains time-sensitive information and is accurate only as of the live broadcast today, August 11, 2021. MedAvail Holdings disclaims any intention or obligation except as required by law to update or revise any financial projections are forward-looking statements, whether it because of new information, future events or otherwise. And with that, I will turn the call over to Ed.
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Thank you, Caroline. Good afternoon everyone and thank you for joining us. We're encouraged to report another positive quarter with sequential revenue growth from the first quarter of 2021. As a reminder, our business model has two business segments
  • Brian Schlerf:
    Thank you, Ed. Turning to our Q2 results, net revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2021 was $5 million, a 118% increase from $2.3 million in the same period of the prior year. These results were driven by 162% increase in retail pharmacy services sale, which was partially offset by a 10% decline in our Pharmacy Technology sales. As we have indicated in the past, Pharmacy Technology sales can be variable from quarter-to-quarter due in large part to customer purchasing patterns. As Ed mentioned, during the second quarter, we deployed 12 MedCenters in the Retail Pharmacy Services segment compared to 7 in the second quarter of 2020. Gross margin for second quarter of 2021 was 3% as compared to 19% in the corresponding prior year period. The decrease in our gross margin year-over-year is primarily due to less contribution from our Pharmacy Technology segment, noting the sale of 7 MedCenters in Q2 2020 versus 3 in Q2 2021. Total operating expenses for the quarter of 2021 were $10.6 million, a 59% increase from $6.7 million in the second quarter of 2020. This expected increase in operating expenses was driven primarily by investments in personnel, facilities and other expenses necessary for the continued build out of our operating footprint, including the launch of operations in Florida. Additionally, we continue to make accelerated investments to automate additional workflows important to our customer service capabilities, including our investment in compliance packaging. Adjusted EBITDA, which we calculate by adding back interest expense, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation and exclude non-recurring expenses and other income to net loss was a loss of $9.7 million in the second quarter of 2021, compared to a loss of $4.6 million in the second quarter of 2020, reflecting the various initiatives and investments in growth you have heard us talk about. We ended the second quarter of 2021 with $48.7 million of cash and cash equivalents. We now have approximately 32.6 million shares of common stock outstanding, and we expect to have a weighted average share count for the third quarter of approximately 32.9 million shares. Turning to our outlook for 2021. We are now expecting at least $21 million in net revenue compared to our previous guidance of $27 million to $31 million. As Ed mentioned, while we encountered some unanticipated headwinds from the timing of regulatory approvals and our decision to withdraw from 10 existing clinic sites before year-end 2021, we continue to anticipate 45 new in-clinic deployments this year. Regarding our gross margin outlook, we remain focused on improving our gross margins throughout the balance of 2021 as we continue to execute on we have previously discussed. With that, I’ll turn the call back over to Ed for closing comments.
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Thank you, Brian. In closing, our unique pharmacy model continues to resonate in the market as we drive strong revenue growth. We are building upon key enterprise relationships and making meaningful progress on several business development and strategic partnership initiatives. These drivers coupled with the tailwinds of value-based care initiatives in a large and rapidly growing Medicare population provide long-term tailwinds to our business. I’d like to thank our partners, team members and shareholders for their continued support as we work to transform the pharmacy market for patients and our partners. With that, we’ll now open it up to questions. Operator?
  • Operator:
    Thank you. The first question comes from Charles Rhyee of Cowen. Charles your line is open.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Yes. Thanks for taking the questions. Ed, I want to talk about this – the 10 sites being kind of closed down here. You mentioned that when you did this review that they were not aligned with what your target model looks like. What is not aligned? Like what has changed at these seats and that’s made you decide to do that? And then secondly, how often do you do these reviews or are you thinking of doing these reviews?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Thanks, Charles. So, the 10 sites that we’re looking at our sites that we’ve been into, most of them for well over a year. We got into them in the midst of the COVID crisis. I would say when we looked at these sites, they have a mix of Medicare and commercial pay. The Medicare is more focused right now on a fee-for-service model. And quite frankly, as we look at the alignment of the fee-for-service model with what we provide and the benefits we provide, there just – there wasn't the traction in those sites that we, quite frankly, require with the model that we're looking at the growth per clinic. So that's what we decided to – when we looked at it, we decided to make that decision now how frequently we do it. We're looking at the clinics, obviously, on a monthly basis. But as we said in the comments, that now that we've made this specific decision that the sites that we have deployed and are deploying, we believe are very aligned with our model moving forward. A little bit of that is indicated by the 10 of the 12 sites we deployed at June are with clients that fit very well with our model.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Can I then follow up by asking – it sounds like you're saying these were sites that you went into last year during COVID. If you saw at that time that the mix was a lot of Medicare fee-for-service, why did you enter into these clinics?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Well, I mean, the belief in at the time working with the clients was that we could make it work. But as we get deeper into it with just the model, the way they operate the business. And I would just point to clinics that are running at risk or heavy Medicare Advantage, they have management systems and incentives in place for their teams that are very aligned with what we do. The fee-for-service model, in this case, has a little more ability for the practitioners to be making their own decisions. So, we really – as we look at our core type of customer, it's the customers we're expanding with right now, the Oak Streets, the Canos, the OptumCares, the CareMore. So that's where we believe and know that we fit extremely well.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. And then when we look at the revenue change in the revenue guidance, obviously it's pretty significant here. Let's take the top end of the old range. So, let's say $10 million, if we were to break down that between the impact of the 10 sites that are being shut down and redeployed and then to the – and then compare that with the delays in pharmacy boards approvals, how would you break that split and sort of revenue impact?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    I would say that, that when we look at it, Charles, what we see is, of the approximate reduction that you're talking about. Half of it is us staring at our clients returning back to pre-COVID volume levels over the back half, and whether or not that's going to happen in the back half of the year, and the other half is associated with the clinic access as well as the delays by the Board's of Pharmacy.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. And then, I think you said, right. When you said 100% growth in 2021, that is we're going – we're backing out the impact, we're backing up the 10 sites. So, you're saying of your remaining sites, we're seeing a 100% growth in 2021. And then I think I heard you say and you expect 100% growth in 2022. Is that just from those sites and doesn't include the impact of new sites coming online, or is that sort of what you're expecting for 22 overall?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    We're saying that we expect for 2022, that we will be growing at the same level, and we are growing in 2021. So, in excess of 100%. And in 2021, what we're saying is that when you look at our revenue from 2020, which when we exclude the $4 million accounting adjustment we had on the revenue line, will more than grow 100% year-to-year from a net revenue perspective.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. So, then your comments around 2022 is suggesting is suggesting factoring that we're going to end the year with 45 deployments, and then whatever deployments are going to happen next year as well?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Yes. We are – sorry go ahead.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    No, no. I guess my question is, okay. So then when we think about Florida and then Texas, is that because we – it takes time for those sites? Obviously, Texas were not really in yet. But in Florida, the time it takes to ramp up those sites is in that sense, is that more of a 2023 benefit to the top line then? And then given the impact of COVID, particularly in Florida and Texas, is that having – are you seeing any delays in the deployments themselves? Any kind of discussions, particularly, let's say, with Cano, and the other group that you have a contract with?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    The – so with regards to our Florida deployments, we plan – right now, we're on track to go live late third quarter, early fourth quarter with the sites that we've talked about in Florida. And so, as we've said, we remain optimistic about the openings in Florida in the back in the second half of this year. As far as contribution is concerned there will be minimal contribution to the revenue this year, those sites, because they're just going to be up for a handful of months in a year. And that's what we expect when we launched those types of sites. And in some of the states, as we talked about, we had eight to 12-week periods now, we have to wait for the board of pharmacy to do their onsite inspection before we can start dispensing medications and capturing customers. So that impacted the year, but certainly and the other Florida sites that we deploy will have a positive impact to 2022. With regards to the COVID situation, I don’t know what the impact could be. So, as we said that we're cautiously optimistic that they'll return to pre-COVID levels in the back half of this year, but we obviously can't forecast that with everything going on.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. And maybe just one last clarification for me. So, if the guidance is now, we're expecting at least $21 million for 2021. Does your comment – your commentary basically implies we should expect for next year at least $42 million in revenue, is that because I am not thinking that $4 million?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    We're not providing the 2022 guidance yet? We're saying we expect next year to be growing at in excess of 100%, but we've not provided guidance for the year.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. So, you're saying in excess off, so at least 100%, but at this point there's no fix number?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Correct.
  • Charles Rhyee:
    Okay. Thanks. Appreciate it.
  • Operator:
    The next question comes from Frank Takkinen of Lake Street. Frank your line is open.
  • Frank Takkinen:
    Hey, thanks for taking my questions. Wanted to start on site activity, a little bit, of the 12 sites that you deployed in the quarter, what portion of those are actively dispensing given the pharmacy board delays? And then can you speak to the cadence of the remaining 30 or so deployments in the back half of the year Q3 versus Q4 to get to your 45 guide?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    So, thanks for the question, Frank with regards to the ones that we deployed in early June, right now, we've got approximately half of those are dispensing, or just started so very, very recently, and then the others are still to be done. With regards to the quarterly deployments, we haven't broken out that quarterly deployments for the back half of the year. But as we said, we remained committed to deploying 45 new sites in 2021. And we have talked about Cano and in a sense, and Access Health that, we will be going live late 3Q early with those sites as we move into Florida.
  • Frank Takkinen:
    Got it. That's helpful. And then thinking about, when you did the deep dive on the current MedCenters out there, any change in your thought process to the core MedCenter clinics, not the 10 that are being closed down, but the other clinics on their potential to get to that million per MedCenter run rate that we've spoken to in previous calls?
  • Ed Kilroy:
    No, change in the sites where we see we've got a very close alignment, we see that the million dollars per clinic as very achievable for our business, and then that's what we're executing to.
  • Frank Takkinen:
    Got it. Okay. And then I just wanted to ask on a little bit more broadly speaking just about the model in general, obviously a little bit of a noisy quarter, quite a few moving pieces. But just wanted to rehash your thinking, I mean, you talked a lot of it on the closing remarks, but just wanted you to kind of think through the model with us and given all the learnings that you've experienced with the COVID year pharmacy operations for some of the non-core med centers that are closing. Has your long-term idea of the model changed fundamentally at all, or is this more of a speed bump reset? And then start to build on the med center based more meaningful in 2022, and get to a more normalized strategy execution.
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Our view of the model has not changed. As I mentioned in the call, demand for the solution is extremely strong. We're expanding with – change in clinics that are a great fit with our model. We're delivering on our commitment around better adherence scores and high levels of satisfaction. So, the answer is absolutely not – have not changed in fact, if anything, we've strengthened. We did need to make a decision on a set of clinics, that quite frankly, when we look at them, we were putting a lot of resources into driving them, but long-term, it just wasn't going to be a fit in our view, and we just have too much demand in other that we wanted to reallocate those resources.
  • Frank Takkinen:
    Got it. Okay. That's helpful. That's all for me. Thanks guys.
  • Operator:
    We have no further questions. So, I'll hand the call back to Frank – apologies, I'll hand the call back to Ed to conclude with closing remarks.
  • Ed Kilroy:
    Thank you, operator, and thanks everyone for joining us today and have a great evening.