Open Text Corporation
Q1 2018 Earnings Call Transcript

Published:

  • Operator:
    Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Open Text Corporation First Quarter Fiscal 2018 Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. [Operator instructions] I’d now like to turn the conference over to Greg Secord, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
  • Greg Secord:
    Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. On the call today is OpenText’s Vice Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer, Mark J. Barrenechea; and our Chief Financial Officer, John Doolittle. We’ll have some prepared remarks, which will be followed by a question-and-answer session. This call will last approximately 60 minutes with the replay available shortly thereafter. I’d like to take a moment and direct investors to the front page of the Investor Relations section of our website, where we have posted presentation that will be referred to during the call. And now, I’ll proceed with reading our Safe Harbor statement. Please note that during the course of this conference call, we may make statements relating to the future performance of OpenText that contain forward-looking information. While these forward-looking statements represent our current judgment, actual results could differ materially from a conclusion, forecast or projection in the forward-looking statements made today. Certain material factors and assumptions were applied in drawing any such conclusion. Additional information about the material factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from a conclusion, forecast or projection in the forward-looking information as well as risk factors that may project the future performance results of OpenText are contained in OpenText’s Form 10-K and recent 10-Q, as well as in our press release that was distributed earlier this afternoon, each of which may be found on our website. We undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements unless required to do so by law. In addition, our conference call may include discussions of certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of any non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures may be found within our public filings and other materials, which are available on our website. And with that, I’ll hand the call over to John.
  • John Doolittle:
    Okay. Greg, thank you. Welcome to the call, everyone. Let’s go through the numbers and my references will all be rounded in millions of U.S. dollars and compare to the same period of the prior fiscal year unless I indicate otherwise. Total revenue for the quarter of $641 million, up 30% from last year, and $636 million up 29% on a constant currency basis. Revenue is negatively impacted by $12 million due to acquisition accounting rules and positively impacted by $5 million due to foreign exchange. Total annual recurring revenue of $489 million, up 29% from last year and $487 million, up 28% on a constant currency basis. License revenue for the quarter of $78 million, up 29% from last year and $77 million, up 27% on a constant currency basis. Cloud revenue for the quarter of $194 million up 14% from last year and $195 million up 15% in constant currency. New MCV bookings this quarter were approximately $67 million up 30% compared to $52 million in the same period last year. Customer support revenue for the quarter of $295 million, up 41% from last year, and $292 million, up 39% in constant currency. Our customer renewal rate is in the low 90s similar to last year. Professional services and other revenue for the quarter of $73 million, up 43% from last year and $72 million, up 40% in constant currency. Next, foreign exchange for the quarter, foreign exchange positively impacted revenue by $5 million and had a positive $0.01 impact on adjusted EPS. The effect of the positive $5 million by revenue type is broken down as follows
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Thank you, John. And welcome everyone. I have four topics to cover on today’s call. First, Q1 highlights, where we had record annual recurring revenue and positive organic growth. Second, acquisition highlights from ECD in our two recent acquisitions of Covisint and Guidance Software. Third, I want to emphasize the long-term durability of our business and acquisition model. And lastly, speak to Q2 in our fiscal 2018 expectations. Then we’ll open the call to your questions. So let me start with Q1 highlights, and year-over-year comparison. We had strong start to the fiscal year, as John noted, all revenue lines and all geographies experienced growth. Americas grew 27%, EMEA grew 34%, and APJ grew 38%. Total revenue was $641 million, up 30% and again we had positive organic growth within Q1. Annual recurring revenue was $489 million, up 29%. This is a record high for the company. ARR is the key revenue metric for OpenText. ARR was $1.7 billion last fiscal year and we’ve grown ARR every year for the last five years and combined cloud and license renewal rates are among the best in technology. Customer satisfaction, product adoption, gaining business value and a strong product roadmap drives ARR. We have 14 deals over $1 million in value, 7 in the cloud, 7 on premise. Key customer wins included Nestlé, Intuit, Bank of New York/Mellon, AAA, Health and Human Services Agency of San Diego, Interplex and the U.S. Army. We delivered $78 million of licenses or 29% growth and $67 million of new MCV or 30% growth. It’s important to view license and MCV together, the main difference being license and MCV is a customer deployment choice. Professional services revenue and margin are on track. We are focused on higher-value services, such as managed services and upgrades, and will optimize for profit over faster revenue growth. We want a world-class PS organization, our customers places our trust in OpenText every day. On our book of business, 28% originated from new customers and 40% was influenced by our partner. We had a strong support both from our large SI partners and our global partner network. And as for geographic breakout, Americas was 59% of our business; EMEA 31%, and APJ 10%. Industries that contributed 10% or more include services, financial services, healthcare, CPG/retail, basic materials and technology. As John also noted, we fully transitioned to our new ERP platform, SAP HANA S4. It’s a key part of our digital transformation as we execute our M&A strategy, growth plans and a focus on growing adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA was $220 million or 34%, up 32% year-over-year. We also closed two key acquisitions in the quarter, Covisint and Guidance Software. And let me wrap up my Q1 highlights and speaking just briefly about AI. Gallo Winery have selected OpenText Magellan. Gallo is largest Winery in the world and employs over 6,500 people, manages over 90 brands and deliver products in over 90 countries. Gallo looks to better understand their customers and further optimize their manufacturing and purchasing decisions, and we’re honored to be their trusted partner as they deploy Artificial Intelligence. We had a strong start to the fiscal year, and we’re pleased with these results. On to acquisitions. Over the last eight months, we’ve completed three key acquisitions
  • Operator:
    Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. [Operator Instructions] The first question comes from Paul Treiber with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead sir.
  • Paul Treiber:
    Thanks very much and good afternoon. Just wanted to focus on the strength in ARR versus last quarter. Any trends that you can outline in terms of like maintenance renewal rates or in terms of like new cloud bookings beyond what you’ve already mentioned that drove the quarter-over-quarter growth?
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Paul, this is Mark. Welcome to the call and thanks for the question. Well, we look towards previous quarters and years MCV bookings that drive us – that take the time to deploy and customers to go live and then flow into revenue, so I would highlight that, number one. And I look to the strength of our – and that’s organic activities, I would look towards the strength of our M&A model, the businesses that we’ve been purchasing have high recurring revenue businesses, either in the cloud or in maintenance. And third, strong renewal rates in the long-term stickiness and importance of EIM.
  • Paul Treiber:
    And then just turning to sales force for a moment, like when you started the new fiscal year. How is the integration of ECD into OpenText sales force gone? Has there been any sort of meaningful churn in that as it came over? And then what are the key priorities for both sales forces now?
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Well, the integration is as we’ve talked, I think last quarter completely done, and complete integrated. So it’s one go-to-market team today. Our turnover has been in line with market norms, so nothing really to call out there. And as we talk – and as I mentioned a little earlier, we had positive organic growth in the quarter, and that’s reflective of stability in the field, of executing and starting to see some of our cross-selling programs coming to fruition, such as Information Lifecycle Management, which was strong within the quarter, bringing extended ECM for SAP into the document base. And we have no other opportunities with solutions like identity and access management to bring into our Trading Grid partners and security and guidance into the full installed base. So integration done and completed well back in late spring, early summer, retention rates high and right – and turnover right in line with industry numbers and another quarter of positive organic growth.
  • Paul Treiber:
    And just lastly, for me, you mentioned the seasonality going into Q2. Is there anything unusual versus the normal track record that you see there, perhaps the ECD in any way? And then related to that, the Release 16 product cycle, sounds like you’re quite upbeat on it. Would that play into some of the strength you may see in the December quarter?
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    No. I kind of take the question, Paul, this may with our recent acquisitions as it kind of change the rhythm of the business, as we get into the last quarter of the calendar year or our Q2. No, I don’t see that at all. I think it’s kind of that typical ICT last quarter to the year. And again, I’ll take it as an opportunity to go back to my prepared remarks that sequentially, Q1 – fiscal – last quarter to this quarter, our internal expectations are to see mid to high single-digit all in revenue growth. So typical seasonality or the business hasn’t changed with the acquisitions.
  • Paul Treiber:
    Thank you. I’ll pass the line.
  • Operator:
    The next question comes from Thanos Moschopoulos from BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead sir.
  • Thanos Moschopoulos:
    Hi, good afternoon. Mark, you typically don’t provide guidance, so just curious as to what prompt did you to do it this time around it. It’s certainly appreciated, which is curious us to what prompt did you to provide the guidance.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    We just wanted to ensure that clarity, given three acquisitions in the year. So just a very simple, we wanted to make sure that everyone had the clarity given Covisint, Guidance and ECD. Very simple.
  • Thanos Moschopoulos:
    Fair enough. It seems like license revenues had a larger than typical sequential decline and I’m wondering I think you alluded in your remarks, would you say that’s because of maybe more customers opting for a cloud deployment as a opposed to an on-premise deployment?
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Yes, Thanos, fair question. Of course, total revenue, it was a strong quarter. But yes, I really feel you need to look at license and MCV together, customers just going to make – we want to win the customer, as we’ve always said, we’re agnostic onto what revenue line falls as long as we win the customer. And in Q1, we had more customers choose, cloud over on premise. It wasn’t quite so in Q4, right? So with license, I think $78 million versus $87 million year-over-year, but MCV was up strongly, $67 million versus $52 million year-over-year, all in, kind of stable. So it’s really the customers choice.
  • John Doolittle:
    I would agree, Mark. It ebbs and flows Thanos, and I think it’s very tough call one quarter at trend, as Mark said last quarter, it was the opposite, so looking them together, I think.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    But all in, we couldn’t be more pleased with ARR, it was a record quarter for ARR.
  • Thanos Moschopoulos:
    Fair enough. And just one last one for me, John, could you tell us what the ECD margins would have been, if not for the acquisition accounting impact. I mean, based on my math, I’m coming up with 31% but I don’t know, if I’m doing the math correctly or not. Thanks.
  • John Doolittle:
    Yes. I don’t have off the top of my head, Thanos, but it was 25% on a reported basis, as I said. And I think we’ve given you the PPA waterfalls so you can probably back into that and get pretty close.
  • Thanos Moschopoulos:
    Fair enough. Thanks, I pass the line.
  • John Doolittle:
    Okay, yes.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Thanks, Thanos.
  • Operator:
    The next question comes from Paul Steep with Scotia Capital. Please go ahead.
  • Paul Steep:
    Great, thanks. Mark, could you maybe talk a little bit about what the new SAP, the transition of the product over to SAP’s latest product set. What you see the potential looking like there, and maybe how that played into the quarter or how it’s playing into the next couple of quarters? Thanks.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Paul, thanks for the question. The partnership has never been stronger. And as I like to say, products will come and go, but the relationship endures. And the relationship between OpenText and SAP is very special relationship. And it really has never been stronger. And with the SAP prioritization of cloud in HANA and as they go out and excite their installed base, we’re right there next to them, exciting their installed base. And we now – as we had – we’ve had a 15-year relationship on prem, and we have that full relationship now on cloud. And we’re learning to sell with them in the cloud over the last few quarters. And I think we’re starting to see wins turn into revenue there as well. So how does it affect our roadmap, to your question? We’re fully supportive of HANA and all of those initiatives, and we are fully enabled. And we’ll continue to remain fully compliant and fully exploit of all their latest technologies.
  • Paul Steep:
    Great. I guess, my last one for tonight, would just be on – if we think about Guidance, you’ve talked about obviously, bringing it on the model. I was thinking more about the opportunity and you could talk to the opportunity that Guidance gives you well, small in bringing it back into the base on your Content Server. How we should actually think about what that opportunity looks like long term? Thanks.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Yes, fair enough. Thanks, Paul. And look, we – there is our – is owning businesses we really like on acquisitions and then there’s a very special place within those zones, when you can find a business that you can protect the base, as we can here and Discovery, but we can unlock upside through new initiatives. I think that Guidance Software really fits into that kind of unique zone within our zone we like to play in. And so strong path on electronic discovery, great compliment with [indiscernible] but the upside for us is to really unlock the information front, that’s an information security. They operate on approximately $35 million endpoints today. And what we’re working on in our road map is to get those 35 million endpoints speaking to our content services platform. That will unlock the value. Get those 35 million endpoints talking Magellan. So we can analyze those behaviors and other interesting things on the endpoints. So will report along here as we go quarter by quarter, but we really like the base business, clear path to getting it to our operating model, and I’m looking at those two ways integration to content services and having those endpoints I talk to Magellan to unlock some upside, our information security…
  • Paul Steep:
    Great, thank you.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Thanks, Paul.
  • Operator:
    The next question comes from Phillip Huang of Barclays. Please go ahead.
  • Phillip Huang:
    Thanks, good evening. Wanted to go back to the ECD margins. Question maybe for longer term, just given the overlap with your existing business, I’d imagine that contribution – margin contribution can be quite significant once you fully optimize the business over time. So I’m not sure if you guys necessarily look at it this way, but what do you think ECD’s theoretical margin contribution could be in the longer term, not just within the 12 months of closing the transaction. You’ve obviously given us the cost synergies number, but just wondering if there’s any upside, if any at all. Thanks.
  • John Doolittle:
    It’s a good question, Phillip and we – I’m not going to give you a specific answer in terms of where we think ECD’s theoretical margin might go to. But look, we’ve made a lot of progress so far. I think our first quarter was somewhere around 13%. This quarter was 25%. We’re committed to get on our operating model by the end of the next quarter. And it’s all part and parcel of us getting to our 2020 aspirational model of 34% to 38%, which is driving improvements across the board including in ECD.
  • Phillip Huang:
    Right, that’s helpful. So I guess, directionally, you guys look at it certainly above sort of where OpenText is current margin would be – just given the nature of that transaction, it strikes me as would be higher than where OpenText currently is.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Let me take, just one example, maintenance and renewals. That is a business that gets more efficiencies with scale. And as we look – as we bring on board the recurring revenues from ECD, that is a business that system scale for support, they scale for customer self-service, renewal agents scale, given the business models are completely identical. So that’s a good example where one plus one is equal a little more than two.
  • Phillip Huang:
    Right. That’s very helpful. Maybe last one for me, just wanted to ask you for an update on the runoffs of the lower-margin professional services contract, where we are on that. And where do you see sort of like the remainder sort of following of – I would almost done there? That’s it for me. Thanks.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Yes, fair enough. Thanks, Phillip. I mean, in the quarter, we had 19%, I think, or 18.8%, 19% for PS margins, up from roughly 15% last quarter. So certainly, we have good progress and really strong PS growth year-over-year, $73 million versus $51 million or 43% year-over-year. I do want to – I want to temper that just by saying we’re going after high-value dollars in PS, so we’re more focused on the margin averse those type of revenue growth numbers. But we’re happy when they come along, as it did. So I’d say, another one to two quarters on that low margin business, you saw good progress in this quarter with the margin profile up from 15% to 19%.
  • Phillip Huang:
    That’s helpful. Thanks very much.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Thanks, Phillip.
  • Operator:
    [Operator Instructions] There are no more questions at this time, I’ll now hand the call back over to Mr. Barrenechea for any closing remarks.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    All right. Well, thank you, everyone, and thanks for joining today. This quarter, members of the team will be attending the RBC Conference in Toronto and the Barclays Conference in San Francisco, and we hope to see you there. And that concludes today’s call.
  • John Doolittle:
    Thank you.
  • Mark J. Barrenechea:
    Thanks everyone.
  • Operator:
    This concludes today’s conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thanks for participating. Have a pleasant day.