BiomX Inc.
Q4 2020 Earnings Call Transcript
Published:
- Operator:
- Greetings. Welcome to BiomX Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2020 Financial Results Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I'll now turn the conference over to Marina Wolfson, SVP of Finance. Ms. Wolfson, you may begin.
- Marina Wolfson:
- Good morning, everyone. And welcome to the BiomX fourth quarter and full year 2020 financial results and update conference call. The news release became available just after 6
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Thank you, Marina. Good morning, everyone. And thank you all for joining us today. 2020 was a year of tremendous progress for BiomX, marked by the addition of two new programs to our pipeline, atopic dermatitis and cystic fibrosis, as well as the announcements of positive Phase 1 data for our lead program in acne-prone skin. Our progress in the clinic continued into 2021, as just last month we announced positive Phase 1a pharmacokinetic data for inflammatory bowel disease also known as IBD. We are proud of our results to date, especially given the challenges of COVID-19, as this could not have been achieved without the dedication and persistence of BiomX research and development team. Our steady clinical progress has positioned us for an even more busy and productive 15-months ahead. To put our progress in perspective, fueled by the advanced and agile capabilities of our BOLT platform, we expect to have four meaningful clinical data readouts within the next 15-months, as well as preclinical readouts that will further support our pipeline advancement for years to come. Specifically in 2021 we are expecting preclinical in vivo data in colorectal cancer in the second and third quarters. We then expect Phase 2 data in acne-prone skin in the third and fourth quarters and a Phase 2 readout in cystic fibrosis in the fourth quarter. These clinical results are expected to be followed by a Phase 2 readout in atopic dermatitis in the first half of 2022 and a Phase 1b/2a readout in IBD and PSC by mid 2022.
- Marina Wolfson:
- Thank you, Jonathan. As a reminder, the financial information is available in the press release we issued earlier today and also in more detail in our Form 10-L, which will be filed later today. We also included in the press release financial information about our results in the fourth quarter of 2020. I will walk you through some of our brief highlights. Cash balance and short-term deposits as of December 31, 2020, were $57.1 million, compared to $82.4 million as of December 31, 2019. Research and development expenses were $21 million in 2020 compared to $13.5 million in 2019. The increase was primarily due to the growth in number of employees, resulting in stock-based compensation, and salaries and related expenses, and due to manufacturing of candidate products for clinical trials in acne-prone skin, IBD and PSC. General and administrative expenses were $9.3 million in 2020 compared to $8.7 million in 2019. The increase was primarily due to expenses associated with operating as a public company, such as directors’ and officers’ insurance, filing, legal and accounting expenses. Net loss was $30.1 million in 2020 compared to $20.6 million in 2019. Net cash used in operating activities was $24.4 million for 2020 compared to $17.6 million in 2019. We estimate that existing cash, cash equivalents and short term deposits will be sufficient to fund the company's current operating plan through mid 2022. We'd now like to open the call up for questions. Operator?
- Operator:
- Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question-and-answer session. Thank you. Our first question is coming from the line of Kristen Kluska with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please proceed with your question.
- Kristen Kluska:
- Hi, everyone. Thanks so much for taking my questions. Hope all is well. And apologies, I actually hopped on the call a few minutes late. So sorry, if I'm asking something you already addressed, but wanted to ask about the BOLT platform and BX004 and BX005. And if you could perhaps talk about the number of cocktails that were evaluated for these programs? And why specifically, you felt these were the most promising to take forward?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Thanks, Kristen. Oh, is a pleasure. And thank you for the great question. So I think the BOLT platform has delivered, in these two cocktails in 04 and 05. I mean, we obviously screen hundreds of candidates. And we've today announced the two cocktails, which have made tremendous progress in terms of their host range and parameters, you know, for clinical outcomes. So I think we feel very confident and after hundreds of stage that were tested, that we have a cocktail that has the attributes of host range, biofilm, stability into rather delivery, and you know, not carrying toxic genes and others.
- Kristen Kluska:
- Great, thank you. And then for the cystic fibrosis study, what specific data might we hear from this study to readout? And what are going to be the main factors you look at to decide whether to move forward with later stage trials or perhaps other stage applications that are similar?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Sure. I’ll let Sailaja to actually address the clinical question.
- Sailaja Puttagunta:
- Great. Thank you, Jonathan. So cystic fibrosis, the first study, we - the primary endpoint is going to be safety and tolerability of a nebulized administration of BX004 in patients with cystic fibrosis who have chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pulmonary infections. The key exploratory endpoints are going to be looking at its ability of this phage product to decrease the bacterial burden in the lungs of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and then look at associated clinical parameters that will be improvement in lung functions and quality of life indicators in these patients.
- Kristen Kluska:
- Great, thank you.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- You bet.
- Operator:
- Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Keay Nakae with Chardan Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions.
- Keay Nakae:
- Yes. Thank you. Good morning. Jonathan, I'm wondering what else you can tell us you've learned in evaluating the Phase 1a data from BX002?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Good question, Keay. I think there are two big outcomes from the Phase 1a, right. The first one is that we can deliver high levels of phage through the GI tract. And that we have confidence in the therapeutic window, meaning we're getting levels of phage, which are 1000 times higher than the levels of target bacteria, right, in our benchmark was to be around 10 times the level of bacteria that guarantee enough phage for killing. We're seeing the phage stick around for a few days, and the GI tract longer, I think that we originally anticipated. So I think that provides a good therapeutic window in moving to the Phase 1b, Phase 2a. Secondly, and I think that's the point that excites us most, is that in BX002 that was used in the first-in-human study, we actually had a phage that was more sensitive to the acidic environment of the GI tract. And aphasia was less than the GI tract. And that was what we've anticipated based on the platform, which is a - you know, of course, a set of computational algorithms, in vitro systems that we put together, and cell based systems. And we've actually seen exactly that in the clinic, meaning that the more sensitive phage seem to be the greatest slightly more in titer, so it's titer was slightly lower, and the more resistant strain, the more resilient one was actually in higher titers. And the numbers in a ratio made sense, it was exactly what was anticipated by the platform. So I think it gives us confidence that as we target other programs in oral delivery, we'll be able to tease out from which phage they can be resistant and sort of achieve the same therapeutic window that we saw in this study.
- Keay Nakae:
- Okay. So based on what you learned here, how is that possibly informing the design of the next 1b/2a for 003?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- So I think with that we know that the dose should be sufficient, right. So we don't need to do anything fancy to try to increase the dose. We don't need to dose it in a more frequent manner, because we have this very good half-life in the GI tract. So I think it basically gives us green light to move with the current dosing paradigm, with the current formulation, and the dosing frequency, right. So now I think we want to pursue patients that have levels of Klebsiella. And want to see whether we can pick up reduction. rest of the question.
- Keay Nakae:
- Okay. Well, let's switch to atopic derm.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Yeah.
- Keay Nakae:
- And while targeting a different bacteria, obviously, the acne and I am just wondering, what have you learned in terms of the topical formulation that you're using for 001 in acne where perhaps you know you're in need for the Phase 2 to go deeper. And how, in any way you're applying those learnings, at least in terms of your knowledge game with the topical formulations for 005 for atopic derm?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Right. So I think atopic derm is a program we're very excited and a testimony of the strength of the BOLT platform, right. We've initiated the program literally in November last year. And we're moving forward to launch a clinical study that will have a readout in the first half of next year. All of the work that we've done, same as what we've talked about in the Phase 1a, so all the algorithms to tease out which phase are going to be more stable in topical delivery, all the work on formulation, dosing regimen, the fact that we know how to take out bacteria in the case of acne, enables that translated very quickly and just, you know, kind of zip through, you know, already having a cocktail candidate, which is ready to go, pursuing now manufacturing and gearing up for dosing. And you know, that's sort of the excitement I think of using phage and having with the BOLT platform, because as a company now we can deliver four substantial clinical readout in the next 15 months, right, two of these readouts were not there in November. So I think that's kind of the excitement. And again, we look forward to potentially even - you know, in the future broaden the pipeline even further. Because once we have all these fundamentals in place, we can just start churning out program for program once things are in motion.
- Keay Nakae:
- And then just a final question for everything coming out from the BOLT platform, 003, 004, 005. You know, what are the remaining tasks left to do before you actually begin their respective clinical studies for each of these?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Just a clarification, you mean, oh, with currently, you mean with our current pipeline? What are the next steps?
- Keay Nakae:
- Yeah.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Got it. So I think we now have right, the clinical candidate for all these programs have been announced. So that means we have a phage cocktail that looks good and is ready to go. It's now basically in steps of manufacturing, again, as a reminder prior of the BOLT platform is actually the in-house manufacturing capability, which is also key to moving so quickly, right. We are not affected in a major way by COVID-19. We don't have - we're not relying on external vendors that are, you know, swamp manufacturing vaccines, and we can do these things in-house, so basically its in-house manufacturing, getting everything ready, both drug product, drug substance, getting the clinical design, the regulatory blessing and then move into a clinical study.
- Keay Nakae:
- Okay, great. Thanks.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- You bet.
- Operator:
- Our next question comes from the line of Joe Pantginis with H.C. Wainwright. Please proceed with your questions.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Hey, guys, good morning. Let me continue with BOLT. So I was just curious, obviously, you have the great advantage, as you just said Jonathan about the in-house manufacturing was looking to see if you can add some commentary about the BOLT advantages, leading to the rapidity that you've seen to be able to deliver 004 and 005 in such a quick manner?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Got it. Morning, Joe. So I think it is - you know, we've invested heavily over the last five years, right and BOLTs to your point is not only the in-house manufacturing, but it is actually bioinformatics, which is crucial, because a lot of times, we do a lot of analysis on the target bacteria on the phage, on the host. There is a big chunk, which is synthetic biology. A lot of times we work either on the phage or on the host, bear in mind that in order to move so quickly, we can't work with hosts, which are you know, your standard APCC, because we're screening things from patients. So we need to have capability to engineer those as well. You know, and then the teams that are doing assays and microbiology that have been doing it now for a while, gained a lot of experiencing, are relying on all the know-how and IP from both the Weizmann Institute and MIT. And basically that's what we're saying, it's kind of moving faster and faster, as these guys just know what they're doing. And they're just becoming more and more experienced in it.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Got it. No, that's helpful. Thank you. And then just switching over to acne, just curious if you can provide maybe not numbers, but sort of how the enrollment traction is going right now? And you seeing any impacts with regard to the - I guess, let's call it the volatility of different regions, regarding COVID?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Sure, I’ll let Sailaja to address the question.
- Sailaja Puttagunta:
- Thank you, Jonathan. So this - the Phase 2 study in acne is a single center study. And fortunately, we have not seen any impacts of COVID-19 in that particular region so far, and enrollment is definitely on track to deliver top line results, as planned.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Right. And then my last question, if you don't mind, and this is actually quite a forward-looking statement, so bear with me. When you look colorectal program…
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Well, call the lawyers, yeah.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Exactly. With regard to the colorectal program, you know, it's actually quite exciting to be able to arm phage, as you alluded to today, also in your press release, and your prepared comments. Is this a program - type of program or platform that you would look to try to hold on to as long as you can versus staying to your core principles and sort of the anti-affect - infective arena? Or just sort of how do you look at it from long term planning? You know, including BB?
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Joe, I think it's a good question, because it's really a program we don't spend enough talking about. And we're actually very excited because, you know, the team has done spectacular progress in terms of synthetic biology, right. And these are not trivial things. Think about that all the tools that were usually used to in microbiology are all around, you know, the E. coli family. To target the cure in colorectal cancer, Fusobacteria is what a nasty bacteria, right. The team has been working north of two years to kind of crack the code, and they've done it. And there's a lot of supporting data for the role of the bacteria and the presence of the bacteria, and the potential benefits of adding a payload. So I do think it is a very valuable program that can deliver meaningful impact to patients. I think what's unique here is that if the concept works, right, there are other tumors that actually have bacteria in them. So that's going to give us a lot of flexibility, right. You could decide to partner maybe on one type of cancer or take another type of cancer by yourselves, you know, maybe try the first one by ourselves and partner to the future one. So, again, we don't know at this point, but it is a really broad indication, and there is a reason where we're kind of keeping it and investing in it because it's a huge unmet need. And there's a lot of potential that's truly differentiated approach in oncology.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Got it. Thank you, Jonathan.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Yeah.
- Assaf Oron:
- Maybe, Joe, this is Assaf to add on that from the business development perspective. We're currently focusing on mainly generating the in-vivo data in the next few months. And being able we are today announcing that we've already engineered an IL-15 gene payload into the phage. Eventually, just as a reminder, the intent is to treat patients with this therapy together with checkpoint inhibitors. So eventually, this will need to be coupled with existing products that currently pharma have. So as Jonathan alluded, we can potentially partner on some applications of cancer on certain malignancies and on others try to develop them ourselves.
- Joe Pantginis:
- Thank you.
- Operator:
- Thank you. At this time we’ve reached end of our allotted time for questions and answers. And I'll turn the floor back to Jonathan Solomon for closing remarks.
- Jonathan Solomon:
- Thank you. I think I want to thank all of you for joining us this morning, want to thank our shareholders for their support and confidence in our work. Our researchers who are hard at work advancing our clinical studies, and of course, the patients who participate in them. Additionally, I want to thank the BiomX team for the dedication and ingenuity despite the challenges that 2020 imposed. Have a wonderful day and please reach out to us if you have any question.
- Operator:
- Thank you. This concludes today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.
Other BiomX Inc. earnings call transcripts:
- Q1 (2024) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2023) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2023) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2023) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2022) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2022) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2022) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2022) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2021) PHGE earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2021) PHGE earnings call transcript