Tsakos Energy Navigation Limited
Q3 2021 Earnings Call Transcript

Published:

  • Operator:
    Good morning. And welcome to the Tenneco Third Quarter Earningd Conference Call. All participants will be in listen-only mode. After today’s presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Linae Golla, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead.
  • Linae Golla:
    Thank you and good morning. Earlier today we released our third quarter 2021 earnings results and related financial information. A presentation corresponding to our prepared remarks is available on the Investors section of our website. Please be aware that our discussion today will include information on non-GAAP financial measures. All of which are reconciled with GAAP measures in our press release attachments and other earnings materials. When we say EBITDA, it means adjusted EBITDA. Unless specifically described otherwise, margin refers to the value add adjusted EBITDA margin. The earnings release and other earnings materials are available on our website. Additionally, some of our comments will include forward-looking statements. Please keep in mind that our actual results could differ materially from those projected in any of our forward-looking statements. In the near-term, we’re looking forward to participating in the virtual Barclays’ Global Automotive Conference on November 17th and speaking with many of you there. Our agenda for today will start with CEO, Brian Kesseler, giving an overview of the third quarter; and our COO, Kevin Baird will provide more details on our performance at the segment level. Our CFO, Matti Masanovich, will discuss our balance sheet progress and provide an updated outlook for 2021. Brian will then wrap up our prepared comments before we move into the question-and-answer session. With that introduction, I’ll turn it over to Brian.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Thanks, Linae. Good morning, everyone, and welcome. Please turn to page four for review of the key themes from our third quarter. As we’re all aware, the operating conditions in the end-to-end supply chain environment are unprecedented. From semiconductor shortages affecting our OE customer bill rates to freight and labor availability, to escalating raw material component costs, we’re managing through a unique operating landscape and are planning for more of the same through the end of 2021 and into 2022. More specifically, in the very near-term, we’re planning for Q4 global light vehicle production to be about the same as Q3. With that as a backdrop, it’s important to know that our global scale and market mix, and structural cost improvement actions helped us mitigate the impact of the challenging operating environment. On a year-over-year basis, our volume and mix was down only 5%, compared to a 20% decline in global light vehicle unit production. On a constant currency basis, our light vehicle value-add revenues outperformed global light vehicle production and our position in various commercial truck, off-highway and industrial end markets and the aftermarket help support our revenue performance. Material cost recovery actions with our customer base are on track and contributed to revenues in the quarter, but with no margin. Importantly, Accelerate+ structural cost actions more than neutralize the effects of unanticipated manufacturing and efficiencies related to the light vehicles semiconductor shortages during the quarter. Planning ahead, we’ve initiated new structural cost actions that will add to the $35 million benefit from the Accelerate+ Program that are expected to carry over in 2022. We are well positioned to benefit from the eventual recovery of light vehicle production volumes. Lastly, our core growth drivers continue to build momentum, Motorparts and the commercial truck-off highway industrial space delivered revenue growth year-over-year. Our Performance Solutions segment is launching 34 BEV and hybrid programs expected to yield annualized revenues of $200 million. Kevin will add more color on launches later in the call, but in addition, our advanced suspension technologies or AST business within Performance Solutions were supply advanced, passive and semi active suspension for light vehicle and specialty markets received very positive reviews in the automotive press for our innovative suspension technologies equipped our BEVs from Rivian and Geely. Turning to page five, let’s take look at an overview of our third quarter results. Revenue was $4.3 billion, up 2% year-over-year driven by our diversified end market mix and includes $1 billion of pass-through substrate sales. As a reminder, substrate sales are only in our Clean Air segment, and our pass-through to the customer at cost plus a small handling fee. Excluding substrates, our value-add revenue was $3.3 billion, down 2% year-over-year excluding the impact of foreign currency exchange rates. As I highlighted on the previous page, this compares favorably to the industry light vehicle production decline of 20% and includes material cost recovery of $110 million. The scale and diversification in our regions and markets served are evident in the charts on the right. In the third quarter, just over 50% of our business was generated from aftermarket and commercial truck-off highway and industrial applications. Adding the light vehicle portion of our Performance Solutions business, which is agnostic to the vehicles Powertrain, 65% of our value-add revenue is unrelated to OE light vehicle ICE technologies. We expect this mix to expand to 80% plus by the end of the decade. Adjusted EBITDA was $279 million and adjusted EBITDA margin was 8.5%. Despite the volatile production environment, we maintain strong liquidity and our third quarter net leverage ratio improved 1.1 times since the end of 2020. On page six, we show our enterprise performance, on the left side of the slide, light vehicle production declines due to the semiconductor and supply chain shortages negatively impacted our volume. We estimate the value-add revenue impact to the semiconductor shutdowns during the quarter was approximately $400 million and our most important geographies experienced the largest adjustment. In a normal operating environment, we would have expected to produce a low 20s incremental EBITDA margin on that revenue contribution. Also, our third quarter value-add revenues included $110 million of material cost recovery via price in the quarter, although no margin dollars came with that contribution. On the right side of the page, adjusted EBITDA was $279 million at a value-add margin rate of 8.5%, down 330 basis points, with almost half of the year-over-year margin rates decline due to temporary cost actions put in place last year that were not expected to repeat this quarter. Material cost recovery lag also represented a significant margin headwind compared to Q3 2020. We remain on our plan to recover the higher commodity costs, but there’s a lag. In each of our business segments, our recovery arrangements vary based on region and customer, which creates timing differences on a comparative basis. In the box on the right, you can see our Accelerate+ restructuring and savings more than offset manufacturing efficiencies associated with the supply chain shortages, which resulted in positive other operating performance of 60 basis points versus the prior year. Overall, solid performance by the operating teams in the quarter. We value their resilience and fortitude in a difficult operating environment. I’ll now turn it over to Kevin for review of the segment performance. Kevin?
  • Kevin Baird:
    Thanks, Brian. Let’s turn to our Motorparts business performance on page eight. Aftermarket revenue was $769 million, up 4% year-over-year on a constant currency basis on continued strong demand and relative to the second quarter, it is in line with normal seasonality. We saw revenue growth in all three regions, including Americas, EMEA and Asia-Pacific. In spite of the lengthening supply chain lead times that are having an effect on our component and finished goods availability. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $115 million, delivering a 15% EBITDA margin, compared to the prior year, margin was impacted by non-recurring temporary cost actions taken in third quarter of 2020, as well as higher commodity price recoveries in the quarter that dilute margins. Before I discussed the OE segments, you will hear some common themes across all three, including the impact of non-recurring temporary cost actions on margins and the state of our net material cost recovery. As Brian mentioned earlier, our commodity recovery agreements differ by product, region and customer. Steel is our most important raw material input and is used by all three OE segments. Also, Clean Air and Powertrain have different commodity exposures, which I’ll touch on shortly. In addition, the late notice on OE customer production schedule changes trapped inventory of approximately $250 million as of quarter end. Western to our Performance Solution segment on page nine, third quarter revenue was $686 million, down slightly year-over-year in constant currency. Light vehicle applications representing approximately two-thirds of the business were down 10% excluding currency, outperforming industry production by 10 percentage points. Commercial truck, off-highway and other applications were up 58% year-over-year and made up almost 20% of revenues. Adjusted EBITDA was $38 million in the third quarter for a margin of 5.5%. Year-over-year earnings comparisons were impacted by the flow-through of lower volumes, the impact from temporary cost actions taken in the prior year and net material price inflation due to the recovery lag. Earlier Brian mentioned the positive market reviews on our Advanced Suspension Technology on the Rivian Electric Pickup Truck program. In addition to our AST product line, we also supply that program with NVH and system protection products. As a reminder, the five product lines in this segment are agnostic to the Powertrain technology in a vehicle. In the third quarter we continue to win new business and are making inroads with China’s domestic OE manufacturers and their EV platforms. Earlier this week, we announced our CVSAe Electronic Suspension Technology will make its China debut on the new premium electric brand ZEEKR from Geely. Lastly, approximately 80% of our alternative propulsion launches in 2021 are battery electric vehicles. On page 10, we show Clean Air’s results. Clean Air value-add revenues were $897 million and fell 8% year-over-year excluding foreign currency effects. Light vehicle value-add revenues declined 22% year-over-year. However commercial, truck-off highway and industrial value-add revenues increased 48% year-over-year. Clean Air’s China commercial truck revenues, as well as North America’s and Europe’s off-highway revenues expanded nicely year-over-year, driving the bulk of the segments CTOHI growth. Commercial, truck-off highway and industrial comprised 27% of the segments value-add revenues in the third quarter, compared to 19% for all of 2020. Adjusted EBITDA was $137 million, value-add adjusted EBITDA margin was 15.3%, compared to 15.6% in the prior year period. Strong manufacturing performance and effective material cost management helped offset most of the negative impact from weaker volume and the non-recurrence of benefits from temporary cost actions realized in Q3 of 2020. In addition to base steel, Clean Air uses large amounts of stainless steel and its operations. Page 11 has a summary of Powertrain. In constant currency, revenues were about flat versus the year ago period. CTOHI and OE Service revenues both expanded more than 20% year-over-year, which helped offset a 13% decrease in light vehicle revenues. Powertrain experienced broad strength in its CTOHI and OE Service in Europe and benefited from the strong year-over-year volume in the North America on-road commercial truck market. Adjusted EBITDA was $74 million and adjusted EBITDA margin was 7.9%. The year-over-year margin decline was attributable to material cost inflation due to recovery lag and non-recurring temporary cost actions in the year ago period. Steel is Powertrain’s most important raw material input, but the business consumes several other metals, including significant amounts of aluminum and copper. Accelerate+ restructuring savings, more than offset inefficiencies related to the semiconductor volume losses. I’ll now turn the call to Matti to discuss our balance sheet and guidance.
  • Matti Masanovich:
    Thanks, Kevin. I’ll begin my comments on page 13. As of September 30th, our net leverage ratio was 3.2 times, which represented a 1.1 times improvement from our year end ratio. With net debt approximately even with year end, our free cash flow performance year-to-date has been neutral. As a reminder, the normal seasonality of our cash flow is weighted toward the fourth quarter. The leverage improvement is driven by higher LTM adjusted EBITDA. We are staying focused on cash conversion, while managing a volatile customer order schedule and the challenging supply chain environment, our focus including networking capital efficiency and reducing capital intensity. Our mid-term net leverage target range is 1.5 times to 2 times. We ended the quarter with strong liquidity of $2.1 billion, with our revolver undrawn and no significant near-term debt maturities As we have in the past, we plan to stay opportunistic regarding our future refinancing needs. Page 14 shows our updated 2021 guidance. We have revised our fiscal year 2021 value-added revenue guidance to a range of $13.55 billion to $13.65 billion, which compares to our prior range of $13.8 billion to $14.1 billion. The change largely stems from lower global light vehicle production relative to our last update. Our guidance assumes Q4 global light vehicle production volumes of approximately 16.5 million units flat with the third quarter, which is more conservative than HIS’ most recent Q4 update. Actual customer production schedules have deviated from their releases over the past several months and this has continued into the fourth quarter. Our guidance incorporates a sequential market volume decline in our key off-road markets and a sequential volume decline in our aftermarket business consistent with normal seasonality. We expect our material cost recovery via price to continue to build, but will be diluted to our margin rate comparisons. We have reduced our 2021 adjusted EBITDA range from $1.25 billion to $1.28 billion from a range of $1.36 billion to $1.44 billion. The primary driver of the change is lower global light vehicle production, due to the semiconductor shortages. The EBITDA decline associated with the loss revenues is slightly higher than normal, because of the sudden nature of the shutdown since midyear. In some cases, we have received little notice from the customers that production was being cancelled, creating inefficiencies and trapped costs. We continue to recover the higher material costs, but there’s a lag and commodity inflation remains elevated. We believe that the lag from material cost inflation will continue to the first half of 2022, as our commodity recoveries timing gets caught up and assuming year-over-year inflation growth rates begin to stabilize. For the full year 2021, we continue to expect year-over-year savings of $110 million from our Accelerate+ Cost Reduction Program. We expect our net debt to improve to approximately $4.3 billion at year end. Seasonally, Q4 is our largest free cash flow quarter. Relative to our expectations, our inventory levels remained elevated in the third quarter due to sudden and sharp light vehicle production reductions at several of our customers. As Kevin mentioned, we estimate the trapped inventory approximated $250 million in the third quarter. We’re working diligently to reduce the inventory and expect it to partially unwind and contribute to our free cash flow generation in the fourth quarter. We have reduced our estimate for full year CapEx spend by $50 million, due to the softer operating environment and our cache taxes are estimated to be approximately $140 million, $10 million lower than fire expectation. The work our team has done since the beginning of 2020 in lowering our capital intensity and our focus on free cash flow conversion has us in a strong liquidity position, with significant cushion on covenants. The management team remains focused on improving our balance sheet. I’ll now turn the call back to Brian for concluding remarks.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Thanks Matti. Turning to page 15, I’ll close with a summary of our major priorities to increase shareholder value. First, we have taken significant structural cost out of the business and we’re not stopping with the Accelerate+ Program. We have identified and initiated new projects that we expect will contribute meaningfully in 2022 on top of the $35 million of carryover savings from Accelerate+. I want to emphasize that this continued focus positions the company to materially improve its margin rate performance once supply chain constraints are relieved and production volumes begin returning closer to 2019 levels. Second, we have lowered the capital intensity of the business to enhance our free cash flow conversion. We remain disciplined with our capital spending levels and intend to continue to enhance our working capital terms. In the mid- to long-term, we target a free cash flow to EBITDA ratio in the neighborhood of 25% to 30%. Third, we’re investing in our businesses that have above average growth characteristics and returns on capital. We believe the investments being made today in key businesses with our Motorparts and Performance Solutions segments will enhance the company’s organic growth over the long-term. Further, we have significant opportunities to grow our CTOHI revenue base over the next several years as new regulations in our geographies increase quote and content opportunities. On a go-forward basis, we believe the 65% of our revenue base not associated with light vehicle ICE applications can outgrow the market and drive above market value-add revenue growth for the entire enterprise, as a company transitions to a predominantly non-light vehicle ICE revenue mix by the end of the decade. On behalf of leadership team, we’d like to thank the more than 73,000 technical team members around the world for their commitment and focus in these extraordinary times, and for taking care of each other and working to keep our facilities operating safely. We’re proud of the high level of services delivered to our customers as they continue to improve our operating performance. Thank you for taking the time to join us today. Operator, we will now answer any questions.
  • Operator:
    The first question comes from Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead.
  • Colin Langan:
    Oh! Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Just one, I mean, can we just broadly go through the puts and takes as we go into 2022? Is there -- how much additional of the restructuring plan is left or are you kind of complete at this point? Commodities, do you actually get some tailwind from recovery, from this year, if they stay at these levels, are you still have some headwinds to go and then what kind of -- you had some pretty rough decrementals on the guidance at least on related to value-added sales. Does that quickly reverse, should we see very high incrementals on that -- the recovery?
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Yeah. Colin this Brian. Let me take the restructuring, as we kind of alluded to in our comments, we reaffirm the carryover impact of the Accelerate+ Program about $35 million into 2022. We’ve initiated and started execution on some further structural cost improvement so that we believe will drive meaningful benefits into 2022. We will highlight the details on that more in our Q4 earnings call as we look forward into 2022. From a material cost perspective, we’re going to see the impact on our revenue with the recovery of the price. We’re on our long track with those recoveries kind of where we expect to be. That obviously are -- those revenue dollars are empty calories. They don’t -- they only recover costs. There’s no margin in there. And we would expect our lag to increase a little bit in this quarter from where we’re at $110 million going up some as we get into the new year. As commodity stabilize, the lag works the other way, the price stays and depending on the contract and with the customers where we are negotiated, we would see a tailwind of benefit as they stabilize and go down. And so that’s kind of that restructuring world and the tailwind world. As you look at the decrementals, it’s actually if you just look on a volume perspective. We’re taking our volume down in CTOH and then seasonally on aftermarket, those are a little bit of our higher margin product lines and so that’s a little bit had impact. But again, the aftermarket is a seasonal, so it’s -- that’s kind of the usual decline Q4 sequentially and CTOH is getting a little soft, particularly in China, as they’re looking to kind of phase out their Phase 5 and get their China’s 5 and getting to their China 6 little bit more. So those are some of the contributors.
  • Colin Langan:
    Got it. Can you just remind us of the net impact on certainly your income from commodities? I mean, what was it in the quarter year-to-date and…
  • Matti Masanovich:
    If you are looking every quarter, we saw that about $43 million that’s on the enterprise slide, that’s the net impact of commodities on us and then on a full year basis we will carry over about $60 million to be recovered into 2022. So, it has about 70 basis points impact to the full year margin.
  • Colin Langan:
    Okay. All right. Thanks for taking my questions.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Thanks, Colin.
  • Operator:
    Our next question comes from Bret Jordan with Jefferies. Please go ahead.
  • Bret Jordan:
    Hey. Good morning, guys.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Good morning, Bret.
  • Bret Jordan:
    On the aftermarket side of the business, could you talk about sort of an apples-to-apples volume comparison? I mean, I guess, there was some market share shift this year in the chasse ease category, but ex that could you talk about what you saw in growth and aftermarket demand?
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Yeah. Volume was about even maybe a bit up year-over-year. Just like everybody else as -- especially as we’re talking to our aftermarket customers, the length of the supply chain coming out of Southeast Asia and China put some availability constraint on us. But team is holding up pretty well as we’re talking to our customers. We’re probably performing better from a fill. So there’s still some availability gas that is that supply chain starts to loosen up and we also have now 30 days ago, 60 days ago, you’ll put in the necessary orders to fill that longer cycle time from order to delivery. So our team is holding up pretty well. The fundamentals on the aftermarket still remain strong. U.S. car sales are record prices. I can’t get new cars, so people are paying more attention to the repairs and the vehicle miles traveled has returned into the pre-pandemic level. So we’d like where we’re positioned.
  • Matti Masanovich:
    On a year-to-date basis, the Motorparts space is up considerably so…
  • Bret Jordan:
    Yeah.
  • Matti Masanovich:
    So we are excited.
  • Bret Jordan:
    And I guess on the fill rate topic, I mean, could you sort of give us a feeling for what your fill rates look like maybe versus the third quarter of 2019 sort of on a ex-pandemic basis how is the supply chain look?
  • Brian Kesseler:
    It’s actually up from Q3, because we have -- the supply chain had troubles back then last year, is still not where we want it from an availability…
  • Bret Jordan:
    You said 2019…
  • Brian Kesseler:
    …stand point.
  • Bret Jordan:
    …not 2020, if we looked at fill rates…
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Oh! 2019.
  • Bret Jordan:
    I want a fill rates. Yeah.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Oh! Yeah. 2019 is probably down 10 points.
  • Bret Jordan:
    Okay. And I guess on aftermarket pricing, are you -- have you gotten, I think, you’d comment in the prior question about timing of price increases. But as you largely pass-through what you’re seeing on supply chain and materials costs in the aftermarket or does that lag?
  • Brian Kesseler:
    We have a bit of a lag with Q3. We’re caught up right now for Q4, paying real close attention to what’s going on with the commodities as we’re sitting here in this quarter. But the team’s done a nice job of getting those pass-through. So a bit of a benefit and as this thing stabilizes a little bit, that lag will work its way out for the year.
  • Bret Jordan:
    Okay. Great. Thank you.
  • Operator:
    With no more questions, this concludes our question-and-answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Brian for any closing remarks.
  • Brian Kesseler:
    Great. Thank you. Thank you, again, for your interest and your questions. We just want to wrap up our call with a few comments. Our disciplined execution in turbulent operating environments has really yield a solid performance by the team since the beginning of the pandemic. We remain committed delivering consistent results and creating shareholder value both in the near- and the long-term. The improvements in our structural costs have firmly positioned us to materially benefit from the eventual return of light vehicle production volumes to pre-pandemic levels in the near- to mid-term. The target investments in our growth engines are beginning to yield both top and bottomline benefits, and have set a solid foundation for our portfolio evolution through the end of the decade. We look forward to stabilizing operating environment and that allows us to accelerate our progress. Thanks again for your time and attention, and we’ll look to speak with you soon.
  • Operator:
    The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today’s presentation. You may now disconnect.