Vedanta Limited
Q3 2022 Earnings Call Transcript
Published:
- Operator:
- Ladies and gentlemen, good day and welcome to Vedanta Limited Q3 FY '22 Earnings Conference Call. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Varun Kapoor from Vedanta Limited. Thank you, and over to you, sir.
- Varun Kapoor:
- Thank you. Thank you, Operator, and good evening, everyone. This is Varun Kapoor, Head of Investor Relations. And it's my pleasure to welcome you to our third quarter FY '22 earnings call. We have with us today the management team headed by Mr. Sunil Duggal, Group CEO; Mr. Ajay Goel, Group Acting CFO; Mr. Prachur Shah, Deputy CEO, Oil & Gas; Mr. Arun Misra, CEO of Hindustan Zinc; Mr. Rahul Sharma, Deputy CEO, Aluminium; and Mr. Sauvick Mazumdar, CEO of Iron & Steel. With that, I would like to hand over to Mr. Duggal to take us through the presentation.
- Sunil Duggal:
- Thank you. Varun. Good evening, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Vedanta Limited FY '22 third quarter earning conference call. This quarter, the commodity market witnessed heightened volatility, mainly driven by energy crisis, worsening supply situation in concern overrising cost. The global economy has been losing momentum because of the new variant of the COVID, supply chain disruption and elevated inflation level. Change in the expansionary stance of monetary policy by central banks and worse than expected impact of Omicron variant may pose pressure on commodity demand and prices going forward. Indian economy has been on a relatively stronger footing, as most of high-frequency indicators surpass pre-pandemic level, though some showed sign of slowing momentum recently. However, government push on infrastructure spending, reviving capital expenditure by corporate sector, credit availability, less stringent curb on movement of people and material, unlike previous two waves of pandemic and mixed sentiments on the lateral impact of the third wave is likely to limit the impact. We expect the demand for mineral, metal and energy in India to remain resilient in a seasonally unbuilt quarter four. Vedanta continued its strong growth momentum this quarter, reporting its highest quarterly and nine monthly revenue and EBITDA, despite macroeconomic and input cost headwinds. We witnessed steady volume performance across all our businesses with aluminum and zinc delivering record quarterly performance. We have become the sole producer of nickel in India post the acquisition of NICOMET, which complements our existing portfolio. All our initiatives on ESG front are progressing well. We are making great strides to stand by the commitment made on renewable energy and decarbonization. We are proud to announce the establishment of our 3,000 Nandghar benefitting 1.20 lakh children and 90,000 plus women. We continued with the strong track record of rewarding shareholders with second interim dividend pay-out of rupees INR5,019 crore, taking the YTD dividend to record of INR32 per share. With a robust balance sheet and liquidity position with net debt EBITDA of 0.7x, we have further committed to delivering consistent growth through capacity expansion, unlocking operational efficiencies through technology and digitization, and targeted acquisitions. As announced last quarter, our reformed ESG vision of Transforming for Good is supported by three pillars
- Ajay Goel:
- Thank you, Sunil, and good evening, everyone. We continue the momentum of superlative financial performance and have surpassed the outstanding results of previous three quarters. This quarter witnessed our record revenue and highest ever EBITDA performance and a very low leverage ratio being net debt to EBITDA. Q3 was benefited by favorable sales realizations on account of lofty prices, zinc and aluminum being at historical high and also hybrid. Operationally, Hindustan Zinc and Aluminum delivered a record quarterly metal production with 11% and 16% growth Y-o-Y. We delivered highest ever ore and ferrochrome production at FACOR. This quarter, we continued with our consistent track record of rewarding shareholders with dividend payout and, at the same time, deleveraging our balance sheet. Some of the key highlights of the quarter are highest ever quarterly EBITDA of INR10,938 crore, up 42% or Y-o-Y with an underlying margin of 37% being an industry-leading margin. Attributable PAT before any exceptional items at INR4,189 crores, higher by 27%, which depicts a very strong financial performance. ROCE, return on capital employed, at 25%, which is a double versus last year's number of 12.5%. Gross debt at INR50,738 crores with cash and cash equivalents of INR25,207 crores shows a very strong underlying financial liquidity position. Net debt at INR27,576 crores, down by 22% Y-o-Y, which is almost INR7,781 crores, more than 1 billion deleveraging with annualized net debt-to-EBITDA ratio of 0.7x, which is maintained at a very low level amongst Indian peers. We have a detailed income statement in the appendix. I want to highlight a couple of areas from that income statement. Depreciation charge for Q3 were INR2,274 crores, higher 19% Y-o-Y, primarily due to higher overall working interest production and depletion charge at Rajasthan Oil & Gas, higher ore volumes and capitalization of Zinc and Aluminum businesses. Quarter-on-quarter, depreciation increased by 7%, which is in line with the business magnitude change sequentially. The finance cost for Q3 was INR1,216 crores, down 8% Y-o-Y, majorly due to lower average borrowings and up 14% quarter-on-quarter, majorly on account of one-time gain we booked on ASI bonds buyback in the previous quarter. The year-to-date cost stands at 8.1%. Income from investment for Q3 was INR516 crores, down 33% Y-o-Y, majorly on account of MTM movement and due to one-time income in the previous year. Income is also down by 11% quarter-on-quarter, again due to MTM movement and utilization of funds for payment of dividend in Q3. The YTD income from investment stood at about 4.7% pre-tax. The normalized ETR is YTD at 27%, which is in the yearly guidance range of 26% to 28%. Normalized ETR, as we know, excludes any tax on exceptional items and tax on intra-group dividends. Now I'll move to EBITDA Bridge. Now starting with EBITDA Bridge Y-o-Y. EBITDA for the quarter, as you may have seen, is higher by 42% Y-o-Y. As we can see on the chart, in summary, the significant portion of EBITDA increase of INR3,240 crores from INR7,700 crores last year to almost INR11,000 crores in this current year has been market or pricing driven, along with higher volumes at Zinc business and higher peers factors at TSPL from 60% last year to more than 90% in the current year Q3. However, this have been partly offset by higher cost at Aluminum and Zinc businesses. Overall, the absolute EBITDA value is 1.4 times of last year same quarter. Moving on to EBITDA Bridge sequentially. EBITDA for the quarter is higher by 3% quarter-on-quarter. So as is evident from the bridge, the market and regulatory forces have negatively impacted our margin by INR337 crores with commodity prices alone showing gain of INR1,142 crores. This is offset by input inflation of INR1,655 crores majorly of alumina and coal at aluminum and also at ESL and IOB sector. On the operations front, the higher volumes at zinc, iron and PSL businesses, was partly offset by higher cost in Aluminum, Zinc and Oil businesses. Overall, the higher metal prices and inflation on input price remains for the quarter both Q-o-Q and year-on-year. Both have different magnitudes. Moving on to next page on net debt bridge. Net debt as of December 31 stands at INR27,576 crores, showing an increase on quarter-on-quarter basis, partly due to investment in the working capital which is in line with the revenue growth this quarter and also on payment of dividends in the current quarter. Net debt on a Y-o-Y basis has reduced by INR7,781 crores, more than $1 billion which is deleveraging. I want to underscore this point that in Q3, as a group, we paid almost $1 billion dividend. At the same time, we deleveraged balance sheet by $1 billion. That I think is quite significant, I think, feat. Moving on to the balance sheet. Long-term focus on balance sheet management is a key improvised priority for Vedanta. The average maturity of term debt is about 3.5 years and YTD borrowing cost at 8.1%. The credit rating has been shown upward momentum with positive outlook by India rating, CRISIL did the same in the previous quarter, Q2. With net debt to EBITDA of 0.7x, we maintain it at a very low level amongst Indian peers. In summary, overall, with an excellent Q3 performance, we delivered both profitability and deleveraging, at the same time, staying the course on rewarding shareholders with handsome dividends and leaving a stronger balance sheet. With this, we are very well positioned to close the year strong. Thank you, and back to the operator for any Q&A.
- Operator:
- The first question is from the line of Amit Dixit from Edelweiss. Please go ahead.
- Amit Dixit:
- Yes good evening. Thanks for the opportunity and congratulations for a good set of numbers. I have two questions. The first one is on your ESG initiative, and thanks for articulating them in so much detail. What I had observed is that a lot of your peers, particularly the global peers, they are building some kind of a portfolio of low-carbon aluminum. So are you also thinking along the same lines and if so, what is the roadmap for the same that is my first question? The second question is on the rationale of acquiring NICOMET. I mean while - so what is your ultimate strategy for that, do you plan to increase the capacity at that plant? And since there are no nickel mines of course, associated with the acquisition, how do you plan to derive value from that?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So, thank you. I'll go one-by-one. On ESG and aluminum basically, you must have heard in my commentary that there are certain initiatives like converting the forklifts to the EV-driven forklifts, tying up with GAIL. And we also said that the last quarter, we purchased the Maxim RE. And amongst all the industrial complexes in the country, we were the maximum user of RE. But to give you a comfort of what else we are trying to do. We said that we are tying up and collaborating with the world's major like HAJJ, VORLI, CSIRO, TERI. So we are partnering with them to work on the technology where the carbon footprint could be reduced, which could be - the example is the Green Anode, some people, global players, the aluminum players are working on that something similar we are trying to do, partnering with them. But as I - we also said that we are in discussion and we are in an advanced stage of signing the PPA for 500-megawatt of round-the-clock renewable power. It is across all our businesses. A major part of it, it's also they are in aluminum. So net-net, what we are trying to do is that we are trying to make a strategy, which is a long-term and a rolling strategy for three years, five years, 10 years, 15 years. As to on the complete value chain, how do we want to go about making our operation carbon net zero on our promise of 2050 and/or before. So that was I think your first question. The second question is on NICOMET. Why we have acquired? So this is one area which actually matches with our strategy and our portfolio and in our journey of ESG also. So nickel is one of the key metal apart from its usage in the steel or the coatings or the alloys. One of the applications which is emerging is the batteries. So here we wanted to put a foot on the ground. And in that direction, we have acquired this asset, and we'll be commissioning this asset in the next one, one and a half months' time. As of now, we are trying to tie up the - for the raw material. But ultimately, our objective is to become integrated. And we are looking at the opportunities globally, which - for which I cannot divulge any information to you at this point of time. But that is what the intention is. But let me also tell you that we have - a domestic consumption of around 36, 37 KT of nickel per annum, of which this operation has a capacity of 7 to 8 KT. 100% of nickel today is being imported. With this operation starting up, we will be meeting a requirement of 7 to 8 KT out of a total requirement of 36 KT. But still, there is a huge scope and requirement for India to build its own capacity of the nickel production.
- Amit Dixit:
- Thanks for the elaborate answer, sir. Just on NICOMET, I mean, what is the ultimate capacity you are looking at and what are the returns that we can expect, let us say, in next three years?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So it is a strategic decision, which we have taken to commission the smelter and build the technology and understand the technology. Ultimately, if we will be able to acquire some mining asset globally, yes we should look at sufficiently good margins, which are equivalent to our other businesses of at least 20%, 30% of the EBITDA margin. But as of now, we are just focusing on how we get our hold on the ground and start the operations.
- Operator:
- Thank you. The next question is from the line of Ritesh Shah from Investec. Please go ahead.
- Ritesh Shah:
- Thanks for the opportunity. I have a couple of questions. First, congratulations on a good set of numbers. Sir, first question pertains to VRL. If you could highlight what is the current net debt position? I think we had indicated that we were planning for certain repayments in the second half of the year. And corresponding to this, how much will be the maturity on bonds term loans? And how should one look at the interest outgo say, from now till March, that's on the VRL that's the first question, sir?
- Sunil Duggal:
- Ajay?
- Ajay Goel:
- Yes, sure. So if you look at the VRL, the net debt position as on the December is about $9.3 billion. And additionally, we also have that inter-corporate loan almost $0.7 billion. So say $9.5 billion to $10 billion is the net debt for VRL. And as you may have seen in the past, after paying the first dividend at the VRL press statement, we spoke about deleveraging of $0.3 billion in the first half and the additional $0.5 billion in the second half. So net-net, $0.8 billion is the deleveraging on a comparable base in the current fiscal. Now so far as maturities are concerned, if I speak of next rolling next 12 months, almost $2.8 billion worth of term debts are falling for maturity. And as I normally speak about, it will be a mix of both repayments and the refinancing. Now so far as interest cost is concerned, I mean, you may have seen the market impact is taping down and you have to wait and watch. But typically, on most refinancing, we'll look at a lower rate. Net-net, given our current year financials, you may have seen the third quarter and typically in our industry, our company, sequentially, the Q4 is the biggest quarter, both in terms of EBITDA and free cash flow. So refinancing VRL or VEDL should not be a challenge.
- Ritesh Shah:
- Right. Sir last quarter, you had indicated $600 million of debt maturity for second half at VRL level. Would it be possible for you to indicate how much would it be for Jan to March quarter?
- Ajay Goel:
- Maybe that one we can send the submission to you by quarter. Normally, we look at rolling, as I mentioned next one year and $2.8 billion is the number.
- Ritesh Shah:
- Okay.
- Ajay Goel:
- March quarter will be a much smaller number.
- Ritesh Shah:
- Okay, fine. My second question is for Duggalji. Sir, what is your status on Videocon, BPCL and third is basically restructuring time lines, and fourth is basically Hindustan Zinc and Zinc International, how should one look at it? Would you go for Hindustan Zinc, Zinc International first or basically would we prefer to go for Hindustan Zinc divestment? So I think put core into one basically incremental capital allocation and - from a structuring standpoint? Thank you.
- Sunil Duggal:
- In one voice, you have asked end number of questions. I'll try to answer one-by-one so maybe on BPCL and Shipping Corporation. The government still has not invited the financial bid. So they had invited the . We participated in both the UIs. And as of now, we are doing the due diligence. And I feel that the government now should ask for the financial bids anytime in quarter four. And as it goes, we would have - we have participated in UI we'll definitely be interested in both the assets. Second, you said on the disinvestment. So everybody knows that we don't have - the court gave a favorable decision and allowed the government to dislodge 29.5% share to the OFL suit. And the government is taking its own approvals. And I think the OFL should happen any time after they complete their loan approvals. We have no role to play in that. As far as ZI and ZL is concerned, I think it's a Board matter, I'll not be able to divulge much information on that. But just to let you know that the internal thinking is on, and the regulatory approvals are being sought as the regulatory approvals will come through, the Board will take its own decision based on its own merit. And what else you asked? Restructuring?
- Ritesh Shah:
- Restructuring timeline, sir.
- Sunil Duggal:
- Yes. Ajay, you can.
- Ajay Goel:
- So maybe just - the whole area of restructuring we covered in details in the last quarter, as you might remember. And one more time if I call of the rationale that the whole concept of the conglomeration or deconglomeration for value unlock is subject of corporate finance or should. The whole idea of any potential demerger, say, for example, aluminum, oil and gas, and iron sector in different listed companies should lead to value unlock, which already exist. So some of the parts should be more than the current role. The whole excise is quite comprehensive, and the Board's guidance last time was to look at many, many options. We believe that the current study will get finished by this March end. So by the end of the fourth quarter, we'll have more update for you tangibly and we'll go back to the Board. And you will be among the first one to know about this.
- Operator:
- Thank you. The next question is from the line of Vishal Chandak from Motilal Oswal Financial Services. Please go ahead.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Thank you for taking my question, sir. So my first question was with regard to the aluminum cost of production. So if you look at FY '19, the cost of production was close to about $1,950-odds which fell to about $1,650-odd in FY '20, and we were talking about a structural reduction in aluminum cost. But the moment we saw coal prices spiking up over the last three, four quarters, the costs have jumped beyond $2,000. So how should we look at the costs going forward? Would it be more related to coal-driven? Or it would be - or we can see some structural reduction going forward?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So thanks for that. I agree that the last quarterly cost has gone up majorly because of the coal. A combination of the linkage realization e-auction prices going up and to mitigate the stock position, we had also to import some coal or purchase some coal from the aggregators. And even some power was also purchased to keep our operations on. So as a combination of that, you know the global energy crisis, which has happened, and the - thanks in one way to the global energy crisis because of which the LME also went up and our margins were protected. So the stocks in IPPs have built up not to the level where they should be. So this is more like a dynamic situation. I would say the - as far as the power cost is concerned, the worst is over. And in this quarter, we should be much better off. The reflection of that is already visible in quarter four now, in terms of the rate realization, in terms of the premiums on the auctions and in terms of the global prices and in term of the IPP stocks. So as a combination of that, I think we should be much better off in the current quarter. As far as the aluminum cost is concerned, which is a factor of the API, API means the - as the LME will rise, the API will also rise. So this is a factor of that. But you know what we are trying to do. We are trying to structurally reduce the cost. And as the alumina refinery is building up its capacity from 2 million ton to 5 million ton, I think in next year, the mechanical completion of Phase 1 will take place in H1, the clinical completion of Phase 2 will take in H2 and steadily the plant will get commissioned and we'll be totally insulated as far as the alumina purchase is concerned. Then we have next question is how shall we source the bauxite. The efforts are on to get the bauxite mine as soon as possible. Also to get the EC enhancement of the Kodingamali mines. With these two factors, I think some insulation will come. Coal, as far as coal is concerned, we are trying to operationalize our mines as soon as possible. We have three mines auction, which we've gone through auction, Jamkhani, Kurloi and Radhikapur. We are trying to operationalize at least two of these mines in the next year and we want to insulate ourselves from the volatilities of the market. As far as the third and fourth factor as the CP Coke and CP Pitch is concerned, which is also a factor of the market fundamentals. On which we may not have much of a control, but there are certain regulatory issues which we can get resolved by not putting the import restriction by the government of India, and we are trying to work on the advocacy, and we will see that how these issues will get resolved. But this is what the story is there in detail. Rahul, you were also there on the call. Anything you would like to add?
- Rahul Sharma:
- No, no. I think you have fairly covered. Only one positive development from the last quarter to this quarter is that last - because we were talking for a last couple of quarters for the Tranche V. I think the positive development, which has happened is 16.6 million ton of coal through Tranche V, which is almost 60% of our requirement, and that is for five years. So this is a positive development which has happened and which gives us a 100% security for Q4. And going forward also in terms of linkage as well as Mr. Duggal said that the new mine, which we have a focus to start, at least Jamkhani in the next year. So that coal side, we are pretty sure and we are pretty secure in terms of structural changes. And apart from that, I think Mr. Duggal has already covered in terms of our alumina expansion then the mine side, on bauxite and coal both. So the fact we are looking and surely from Q3 to Q4, we have a reduction plan for 8% to 10% in terms of the cost point of view through structural changes.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Right. Sir, my second question was with regard to the provisioning, which has been done for the KCM mines and which says that the outstanding as on 31st December, they're still INR214 crores. And also simultaneously, we have launched a new code of conduct also. So in light of the new code of conduct, is it possible to take a complete write-off? Because we all understand that this particular company, KCM has been under liquidation for quite some time. So should we just write it off? Or should we continue to evaluate that 50% is still really receivable?
- Operator:
- Excuse me. Sir, just give me a minute. I believe the management is not able to hear us. I'll just reconnect them. Allow me a minute, please. We have the management reconnected. Sir, you may please go ahead with the question. Sir, I would request you to please repeat your question.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Yes, sure. Thanks. Sir, in the press release, we have mentioned that we have taken a provision of about INR213 crores for the KCM mines, while still INR214 crores still remains on the books. Now, given the fact that this company has been under liquidation for quite some time, and the government of Zambia is obviously not interested in giving the company or the mines to Vedanta, how should we look at this provisioning going forward? Is it just a technical point of writing it off? Or we still really expect this to be recovered? Because this has been going on for several quarters. And just a linked question to that. We have released a new code of conduct. So you always mentioned that we have the highest standards of the code of conduct for business at Vedanta. So what additional are we looking at when we are releasing this new code of conduct? That would be all from my side. Thanks.
- Ajay Goel:
- Sure. So let me just address them - both of them. So starting with the KCM point first, you're right. So first of all, there's no write-off on KCM amount on the Vedanta books, it's only an accounting provision. Total amount outstanding on the books is about INR650-odd crores and we provided one-third in F '20 and another one-third last fiscal in the March. And there is no provision, I guess, in the previous quarter. That lead to the remainder, one-third about INR230-odd crores balance on balance sheet as on December end. We think the entire amount is fully recoverable. The valuation for this remainder balance one-third is backed up by evaluation by one of the big fours. Let me add that Vedanta Limited is one operational creator ahead of, in fact, from the VRL side. This amount, we believe, is very much backed up by third-party opinion, fully recoverable.
- Sunil Duggal:
- Otherwise, also, we are in active talk with the government there and all stakeholders. So it is - I mean, we still believe and have a confidence that we should be able to get the legal support, number one. Number two, the advocacy efforts are also going on, a combination of this would lead us to restoration of our management there, and we are really excited and committed to this mine. And this mine still has a great future because this is one of the richest copper source in the world.
- Vishal Chandak:
- So the arbitration is going on in which place for this particular mine right now?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So arbitration is going on in London.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Okay. And we are expecting a decision soon on this?
- Sunil Duggal:
- No, the businesses are going on as we speak.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Sure. Just on the code of conduct, sir.
- Sunil Duggal:
- But at the same time, we are in active engagement with the government there.
- Vishal Chandak:
- Sure.
- Ajay Goel:
- Sure. I'll move to the second part, what you asked about the code of conduct. I mean, as you would appreciate, the documents like code of conduct, they are living documents, they need to be revised at some intervals. What may have changed? First of all, we engaged again one of the consulting firms in terms of benchmarking with the best in the country on this field, being governance. Three, four areas, some areas have been embellished. Take an example, the law around the anti-bribery, be it UKB or FCPA or the Indian laws. That section has been embellished, made more clearer to the employees. Few areas, for example, the new age laws around the privacy and GDPR has been added. Some guidelines around how to conduct ourselves in social media has also been added. Last one and perhaps one of the more important areas is addition in terms of diversity and inclusion from employees' viewpoint and Vedanta's commitment on renewing that we are an equal opportunity employer has been added. So with this, I think our current COC is at par with the best in the country. This COC will be published on the website late in the evening or tomorrow morning.
- Operator:
- Thank you. The next question is from the line of Pinakin from JPMorgan. Please go ahead.
- Pinakin Parakh:
- Yes. Thank you very much, sir. I've got two questions. My first question pertains to the aluminum cost of production target. Now over the years, Vedanta has consistently missed the aluminum cost of production target. And again, this time, it is based on higher alumina content and 100% coal. Now sir, can you give us a more granular clarity on the coal production breakup over the next three years? What is the total requirement? And how does the company plan to achieve that over F '23, '24 and '25?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So ultimately, we want to source the complete coal through our own mines. So as we said that we want to operationalize at least a couple of mines in the next year and ramp up as we go forward. So I mean, the 1 ton of aluminum requires around 10 to 11 tons of coal. So say 2.2 million ton required around 26 - 25 million, 26 million tons of coal. A part of it - a major part of it will be met through the operationalization of these mines. Rahul, if you have some more granular details, would you like to tell that?
- Rahul Sharma:
- Yes. So I think the - from the whole point of view, basically, our requirement would be around 25 million ton. And what we are looking, as I said, one is that Tranche V, which gives almost 60% of our volume, which is for five years. Apart from that, we have three core mines, which is Jamkhani, Radhikapur West, Kurloi. And if I see that these three mines has a potential to go up and give us almost 100% requirement for 21 million, which can be Jharsuguda. And that's how we are building up in terms of initially, it will be a mix of our Tranche V, which is linkage for five years. And also the mine, which is going to start in next year, which will be Jamkhani and then Radhikapur West. And gradually, we want to move to 100% with our captive coal mine. That's our plan. And let's say, we have clear roadmap in terms of when these kind of events will take place.
- Pinakin Parakh:
- So is it fair to say that the 26 million tons of captive coal would be over a much longer period and the next three years, would be just about ramping up some of these coal mines and hence, the actual captive coal production would be much lower than the 26 million ton?
- Rahul Sharma:
- No. Basically, if you see that each mine has like 8 million to 10 million kind of capacity apart from Jamkhani, which is 2.6 million also double. And these three mines, which is - on PRC level, they are talk, which is a government, almost 17 million, 18 million. And I'm talking with maybe they are 30% increase, which is really possible 31 million. And total requirement is 25 million. So that's how we are going to manage in the overall portfolio.
- Pinakin Parakh:
- Understood.
- Rahul Sharma:
- Let's look at minus in winter, which is closest to our plant also.
- Pinakin Parakh:
- Sure. And my second question relates to the CapEx program in the various divisions, now with the, Chairman also having commented about the potential demerger into separate entities. Now, at this point of time, basically, aluminum and zinc account for more than 85% of the consolidated EBITDA? So given the fact that some of the smaller businesses may not be able to fund growth CapEx on its own, would it be prudent to stop CapEx programs in non-aluminum and non-zinc till the organization structure is clear because if there is a demerger, then will the programs be funded via borrowing on those entities?
- Sunil Duggal:
- We cannot give you a granular detail, but let me tell you that what is, the opportunity. I would give you a couple of examples which are not aluminum and zinc. One is that unfinished project of Electrosteel. There is hardly any jobs which have to be done, around 30% of jobs have to be done, and this will give us a complete capacity of 3 million tonnes. So there is a question of funding, and this is a very low-hanging fruit. Another example is the NICOMET furnace. We have a capacity to produce 80 KT of ferrochrome today. And there is another furnace 60 KT, which is unfinished furnace. As we speak, we have started doing the engineering and the balance job completion discussion for this furnace. So this will take our capacity of this from 80 KT to 60 KT. Otherwise also is one acquisition, which has given us rich dividends. And the opportunity in the mines and the way the R&R we have raised by doing the drilling at such a faster speed gives us the opportunity even to go beyond 140 KT. So - but 140 KT, we should be able to go in the next year itself with raising the mining capacity for which also we are going ahead with the environment clearance and then commissioning this furnace. So these are a couple of examples. So similarly, there are a lot of opportunities in all our businesses, where - we will keep evaluating that in the near term, what could be the low-hanging fruits through which it will add to the EBITDA of the individual entities. Otherwise also, we have not split the company. This was the proposal which was given. We formed the subcommittee of the Board, of which I'm also a member. We are working on various options. And based on various options and the merits, we will put up the various options to the Board in the next two to three months' time. Depending on what we decided at that point of time, we will come back to the market that which way we are going.
- Operator:
- Thank you. The next question is from the line of Sumangal Nevatia from Kotak Securities. Please go ahead.
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Yes, thank you for the opportunity. Couple of questions first, is there any royalty or what - if you could just confirm what is the royalty which Vedanta India pays to Vedanta Resources? And how has this changed in the last couple of years? And is there any consideration of any revision in this royalty rate?
- Ajay Goel:
- Yes, sure Sumangal. So royalty, this element impact was first documented in 2017 and got revised in 2020. So the current agreement will expire next year sometime in Feb, March. As you know, the entire agreement has been actually benchmarked by the Big Four. And our rate of royalty for a couple of large businesses is around 1.5% to 2%. If I give you the overall quantum of royalty for the current fiscal, it is about $200 million on a yearly basis. This amount has been mostly paid in fact, as an advance for the current fiscal and this is how the numbers stack up by the fourth quarter will be actualized. So in the current year, there is no upward revision per se, and this revision is falling due next year. And as and when any revision take place, any terms and conditions, it will be externally benchmarked, will be arm's length and obviously, will get approved by Audit Committee and Board of Directors.
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Understood. So this $200 million is the payment for FY '21, is that right?
- Ajay Goel:
- It is for the current fiscal 2022. It is paid in advance, and it is actualized in March, the fourth quarter which is, the actual - this is for the fourth quarter. But the actual number will not vary by a significant number.
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Understood, understood. Second question is with respect to our vision in growing the steel business. There are a couple of inorganic or acquisition opportunities in the market which are - under various stages. What are all opportunities excite us? And what are the plans with respect to organic and inorganic growth in the steel business?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So, we have been evaluating whatever the option comes in the market, and you know Vedanta, that we keep evaluating. As far as ESL is concerned, we are going to commission 3 million tonnes in the next one year. And beyond that, whatever the opportunity is there in the market, we will evaluate and see that what best is possible for us.
- Operator:
- Excuse me, sir, does that answer your questions?
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Yes sorry, sorry, I was on mute. I'll just have one small clarification left. So this entire restructuring exercise, which is under evaluation. I mean, is there also a consideration of merging any entity which is outside of Vedanta India and still as Vedanta Group into Vedanta India or something of that also being considered or it's just a split of existing Vedanta India?
- Sunil Duggal:
- We are exploring various options.
- Ajay Goel:
- Yes, and if I just maybe go back Sumangal, to what we spoke in the previous quarter and our 17th November press release. So the intent was to look at restructuring. And I spoke to you also, I guess, when I was in Mumbai last, sometimes in November. Right now, the thinking was around Vedanta Limited and potentially looking at three large entities, Aluminum, Oil & Gas and Iron Ore business. Having said that, the Board's mandate to the management is to go for a comprehensive review, so all options are on the table, and we'll leave with a couple of more months' time. So by sometimes March end, the current quarter end, we'll have more clarity.
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Understood. Is it possible to educate us what are, the other big businesses which have - strategic connections with Vedanta India and the Vedanta Group? Hello.
- Operator:
- We have the line connected, sir. Please go ahead.
- Sumangal Nevatia:
- Yes, so I just was asking a follow-up that what are the other businesses in Vedanta Group, which could be strategic or related to Vedanta India? Is it possible to share the details?
- Sunil Duggal:
- So Sumangal, I mean sorry, we dropped off. Yes, I think right now what we spoke last time again was Aluminum, Oil & Gas and Iron & Steel. By which, as it appreciate, unless we have an internal alignment and go to Board, setting a commission at this point will not be appropriate. Allow us a couple of months' time, and we will be sharing it as soon as possible.
- Operator:
- Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today. I would now like to hand the conference over to Mr. Varun Kapoor for closing comments, over to you, sir.
- Varun Kapoor:
- Thank you very much, operator, to conclude. Thank you all for taking us the time to join us this evening. If you have any further questions, please feel to reach either me or the rest of the Investor Relation team. I would like to wish everybody a happy weekend. And with that, I'll pass it back to the operator.
- Operator:
- Thank you very much. On behalf of Vedanta Limited, we conclude today's conference. Thank you all for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.
Other Vedanta Limited earnings call transcripts:
- Q4 (2024) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2024) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2024) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2024) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2023) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2023) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2023) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2023) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2022) VEDL earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2022) VEDL earnings call transcript