Acceleron Pharma Inc.
Q2 2018 Earnings Call Transcript
Published:
- Operator:
- Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to Acceleron Second Quarter 2018 Earnings Conference Call. [Operator Instructions]. As a reminder, this conference may be recorded. I would now like to hand the call over to Mr. Todd James, Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications at Acceleron. Please go ahead.
- Todd James:
- Thanks, and welcome, everyone, to our second quarter 2018 earnings conference call. The press release reporting our financial results, in addition to the presentation for today's webcast, are available on the Investors and Media page of the corporate website at www.acceleronpharma.com. Joining me for the call today are Habib Dable, our Chief Executive Officer; Robert Zeldin, our Chief Medical Officer; Kevin McLaughlin, our Chief Financial Officer; John Quisel, our Chief Business Officer; and Sujay Kango, our Chief Commercial Officer. Our goal this afternoon is to provide an overview of our recent operational progress along with reviewing our corporate priorities and updated financial results for the second quarter. After that, we look forward to answering your questions. As a reminder, we will be making forward-looking statements regarding our financial outlook in addition to regulatory and product development plans and research activities. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to materially differ from those forecasted. A description of these risks can be found in our most recent Form 10-K on file with the SEC. I would now like to turn the call over to Habib Dable, our Chief Executive Officer.
- Habib Dable:
- Thanks, Todd, and good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We had a successful and important quarter, and I'm very proud of our team's execution and program advancement in our focused therapeutic areas, hematology, neuromuscular [indiscernible] position us to build therapeutic area leadership and deliver innovative medicines to patients with serious and rare diseases. We look to carry this momentum forward throughout 2018 and beyond. As you know, we recently announced positive top line results from that MEDALIST and BELIEVE trials of luspatercept. This is a very exciting statement for our team as it is our first internally discovered therapeutic to have positive Phase III results across two distinct chronic immune indications. I will jump into more detail on this in a minute. We also achieved critical milestones across our wholly-owned pipeline, including the recent Part one Presentations of ACE-083's Phase II trials and Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, or CMT, in facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy, or FSHD. Part two of each trial is now underway, and we recently initiated the PULSAR trial for sotatercept in Phase II in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, or PAH. Turning now to luspatercept and hematology. We are very excited about the recent news for luspatercept, our first-in-class erythroid maturation agent to treat late-stage maturation defect in multiple serious hematologic diseases. A few weeks ago, and along with our collaboration partner, Celgene, we reported positive top line results for MEDALIST and BELIEVE Phase III trials in patients with low to intermediate risk myelodysplastic syndromes, or MDS, and transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia, respectively. These data had been long anticipated and we were thrilled that luspatercept met all primary and key secondary endpoints across the 2 pivotal trials. The Phase III data will be submitted to a future medical meeting for presentation in late 2018. And we also plan to submit regulatory applications in the U.S. and EU during the first half of 2019. We recently presented updated results from our ongoing Phase II trials in lower-risk MDS and beta-thalassemia at the 2018 ASCO Annual Meeting and the 23rd Congress of the EHA. The Phase II trials continue to highlight robust response rates and long-term duration of patient benefits with the favorable safety profile. We continue to be encouraged and observe multiple patients remaining on treatment in both studies through 3 years who continue to sustain clinically meaningful increases in hemoglobin and red blood cell transfusion reduction. We continue to invest in expanding the overall market opportunity with luspatercept. And with the upcoming start of the COMMANDS trial, we will have 7 ongoing clinical trials across 5 indications in MDS, beta-thalassemia and myelofibrosis. In the COMMANDS Phase III trial, we evaluate luspatercept head-to-head versus the current standard of care [indiscernible] with a goal of showing superiority in patients with lower-risk MDS who are treatment [indiscernible]. We also have two ongoing Phase II trials in patients with non-transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia and myelofibrosis. As I've stated before, our top corporate priority is advancing luspatercept and building leadership in chronic anemia. Considering the positive results in two distinct hematologic diseases, luspatercept has the potential to be a platform treatment for chronic anemias. To that effect, Acceleron and Celgene are actively evaluating a number of opportunities in addition to the 5 indications currently in clinical development. Our goal is to fully maximize luspatercept's availability to the many patients suffering from anemia through expanded clinical development and lifecycle management plans. With the current indications under development alone, we estimate that luspatercept has the potential to address over 120,000 patients in the U.S. and EU. So as you can see, there is a significant opportunity for luspatercept to affect the lives of many patients with chronic anemia. Before I turn over to presentation, I also want to highlight 2 key hires in our clinical development organization. First, I want to welcome and introduce our new Chief Medical Officer, Robert Zeldin. Robert joins us from Ablynx where he served as Chief Medical Officer and led the development of [indiscernible] until the company was recently acquired by Sanofi. He brings over 20 years of industry experience, including senior roles at Merck, Novartis and the FDA. He will be instrumental in advancing our corporate strategy and leading clinical development. I'm also pleased to welcome Janethe Pena as our therapeutic area Head of Pulmonary. Janethe comes to us from Bayer where she most recently led the Pulmonary Clinical Development Group. At Bayer, she was responsible for leading the clinical trials of riociguat in several pulmonary hypertension indications. Dr. Pena joins Acceleron at an important time as we advance luspatercept to clinical trials in PAH and investigate additional potential indications for our pulmonary pipeline. I will now pass the presentation over to Robert who will discuss our neuromuscular and pulmonary pipeline progress for the quarter.
- Robert Zeldin:
- Thanks, Habib, and good afternoon, everyone. I'm delighted to have joined the Acceleron team. As a drug developer and clinical trialist, I believe our pipeline of TGF-beta therapeutics has the potential to significantly impact areas of high unmet medical need as evidenced by the recent positive Phase III readouts for luspatercept. In neuromuscular, we've made significant progress with ACE-083, our locally acting Myostatin+ agent designed to increase muscle mass and the strength of target muscles for diseases that cause focal muscle weakness. The FDA recently granted ACE-083 both fast-track status and orphan drug designation for FSHD. In October, we plan to present an update from Part one of our Phase II FSHD trial, which will include results from dose cohort 3. Part two of the trial is ongoing. In CMT, WE recently presented part one results from the Phase II trial at the 2018 Peripheral Nerve Society Meeting where ACE-083 achieved increases in mean total muscle volume of more than 12% in the tibialis anterior at each of the three dose levels. We also observed mean absolute improvement in fat fraction ranging from 1.7% to 3.5%. We are encouraged by the results and are pleased to announce the initiation of the placebo-controlled part two of the trial. Enrollment and treatment are ongoing in the Phase I healthy volunteer trial of ACE-2494, our systemic Myostatin+ agent. The pulmonary program represents a key pillar of our clinical development strategy, and we're pleased to have recently initiated the PULSAR Phase II trial with sotatercept in patients with PAH. The primary endpoint is an assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance over a 6-month treatment period. Key secondary endpoints include 6-minute walk distance, clinical worsening, change in World Health Organization functional class and change in quality of life. We are also planning an exploratory imaging study at a number of PAH Centers of Excellence in the U.S. In this study, we'll be exploring possible endpoints for our potential future trials in PAH. We hope you will join us in New York in November where we are planning a research and development deep-dive events to cover PAH. The event will include internal and external expert presentations on the current treatment gaps, sotatercept's mechanism of action and the importance of BMP signaling in PAH, along with preclinical presentations and an overview of our clinical development efforts. Please be on the lookout for additional details as we get closer to November. With that, I look forward to meeting with many of you at upcoming investor meetings or medical conferences and will now turn the call over to Kevin McLachlan, our Chief Financial Officer, to run through the financials for the quarter.
- Kevin McLaughlin:
- Thanks, Robert. Good afternoon, everyone. Our cash, cash equivalents and investments as of June 30, 2018, were $332.3 million. This compares to December 31, 2017, cash, cash equivalents and investments of $372.9 million. As a reminder, we believe that our existing cash, cash equivalents and investments will be sufficient to fund our projected operating requirements into 2021. Collaboration revenue for the second quarter was $3.7 million. The revenue is all from our Celgene partnership and is primarily related to expenses incurred by the company in support of luspatercept. Total costs and expenses for the second quarter were $33.6 million. This includes R&D expenses of $25.9 million and G&A expenses of $7.7 million. The company posted a net loss for the second quarter ended June 30, 2018, of $28.9 million. I'd now like to turn the call over to Habib who will quickly cover our upcoming corporate priorities.
- Habib Dable:
- Thanks, Kevin. For hematology, we expect to present MEDALIST and BELIEVE Phase III trial data at an upcoming medical meeting by year-end 2018, file applications to the U.S. and EU regulatory authorities in the first half of 2019 and to initiate the COMMANDS Phase III trial this quarter. In neuromuscular, we expect to present preliminary results for Part one of the ACE-083 Phase II FSHD trial for all dose escalation cohorts in October 2018 and to report preliminary results from part two of the trial in the second half of 2019. We further expect to report preliminary results from Part two of the ACE-083 CMT trial by year-end 2019. ACE-2494 Phase I results remain on track for the first half of 2019. In pulmonary, we plan to provide preliminary results from the PULSAR Phase II trial in the first half of 2020 and additionally, plan to initiate an exploratory imaging study in the first quarter of 2019. As you can see, we are actively advancing multiple programs as we push toward our goals to be a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company and to have three programs in Phase III development by the end of 2020. I will now open the call to questions. Operator?
- Operator:
- [Operator Instructions]. And our first question outcome from the line of Carter Gould with UBS.
- Carter Gould:
- Habib, you laid out a clear strategy at your R&D day at last year. And now with the luspatercept, you're risking data in hand in consideration of the downstream economics. What give you kind of confidence to move to accelerate or broaden the strategy of some of your investments beyond what you've previously outlined? And then secondly, I was hoping you can comment a little bit on the exploratory imaging study in PAH. I'm assuming that will be [indiscernible] MRI focused. Can you talk about the strategy there and importance of that? Is that more about helping demonstrate biological proof of concept? Or potentially about laying the groundwork for incorporation of imaging endpoints into Phase III?
- Habib Dable:
- Great. Thanks a lot. Appreciate the questions. So first of all, with respect to the data, obviously, we're thrilled with the recent announcements for both Phase 3s. With respect to your questions specifically though in terms of the strategy that was laid out, I would say that this is part for the course in terms of our expectations. We have been planning for success with luspatercept. We have committed to, in September, to treat therapeutic areas and hematology, neuromuscular as well as pulmonary. And with the ongoing clinical development programs and the commitments that we've been making to them, on top of our anticipation of moving forward our preclinical pipeline, we feel very comfortable that we are making all of the appropriate investments within those therapeutic areas for leadership. That said, as we continue to gain more and more confidence within our portfolio, as I've also said before, one of the things that results to our commitment to the specific therapeutic areas, and I would argue that in most of the areas that we're in, we are focusing on areas where there are a little to no pharmacology solutions. And we are also just proportionately gaining insights in many aspects of that is he's whether that's in terms of understanding of the way players are thinking about endpoints. If we understand about the way investigators are thinking about clinical trials design, et cetera, et cetera, we also are positioning ourselves well to hopefully become a partner of choice in these disease areas that we've declared that we're also simultaneously be looking at in organic growth opportunities. And obviously, with the success of luspatercept, that will give us hopefully, income in the firepower as we start thinking about inorganic opportunities for growth as well. With respect to your second question in terms of the exploratory study, right now, I can tell you that there are number of things that will -- that we can benefit from, from this exploratory studies. For example, in terms of helping us in another way in terms of thinking about Phase III endpoints once we get to that point. Beyond that, I would really encourage all of you to kind of save the date or look for the save the date in November where we plan to host, I guess, I seminar in November. That date is yet to be determined. And we will provide a lot more details in terms of what the objective of the exploratory study will be and what some of the dynamics of that. I'm not sure if there's anything else you want to add to that, John?
- Operator:
- The next question will come from the line of Geoff Porges with Leerink.
- Geoffrey Porges:
- I wanted to get a little color, if I could. I wonder if you can give me other observations you have from this clinical data set you got a lot more experience now with luspatercept and have a pretty good idea of presumably about what some of the secondary metabolic and hematologic effects had and what symptomatic response frankly patients have experienced while on the medicine. Could you give us a little sense of any of those observations from a study data set?
- Todd James:
- Yes. Geoff, it's Todd. So at this point outside of the top line results, all that will need to wait for the Medical Congress that we present late this year.
- Geoffrey Porges:
- Well, can't you just push them a little bit and say is there anything there that would suggest other indications that you could pursue now that you have these positive -- strongly positive results and initial 2 indications?
- Todd James:
- So I would say that it's really -- we feel like we're in a good spot to have 2 positive readouts into very two distinct diseases. And so when we think about expansion opportunities, no reason to think that any potential anemia should be evaluated for potential future development. So that's where we are today. And we look forward to providing an update as soon as we make those decisions for our future investments.
- Operator:
- And the next question will come from the line of Eric Joseph with JPMorgan.
- Eric Joseph:
- Just a couple from me. First, with respect to the regulatory filings with luspatercept, were there any sort of special considerations with respect to review time lines considering it will be a dual indication filing? I have a follow-up on ACE-083.
- Robert Zeldin:
- I'll take that one. It's Robert Zeldin. I don't think that [indiscernible] that we'll be filing for both MDS and beta-thalassemia is likely to impact review time lines. Of course, it will be up to the agency. Based on the process will, of course, in the U.S. request prior to review and the agency will inform us of their acceptance of that proposal within the usual time period for such a feedback, which is if I recall correctly, 60 days.
- Eric Joseph:
- Okay. And just have you been wondering if you could set the stage a little bit heading into final part one data with ACE-083 and FSHD, whether functional or strength measures will be a part of that presentation? How should we be thinking about the read-through value those data to the randomized part two portion in 2019?
- Habib Dable:
- Thanks for the question, Eric. It's Habib again. So yes, just to be clear, part one of the study both for FSHD and CMT had been designed on to address and to answer questions regarding safety tolerability as well as increases in muscle mass. And based on the data that we've seen in part one, we have been encouraged for both diseases to proceed into part two where it is specifically designed for both diseases to look in a randomized placebo-controlled fashion and answering the question as to whether or not we could translate these findings in part one into a functional benefit, and that's what part two will be designed. So absolutely, there will be no findings that add -- and with respect to part one in terms of strength and function that will be discussed.
- Eric Joseph:
- Okay, got it. May be just a final housekeeping question. Just with any regulatory milestones tied to luspatercept that we might anticipate in 2019, should we be thinking about those on acceptance? Or on final approval?
- Habib Dable:
- Yes. So the regulatory, just to remind everyone, there's currently $185 million in outstanding milestones, $85 million are commercial; and $105 million, regulatory. And the next payment due is the $25 million upon acceptance of the filing.
- Todd James:
- Eric, it's Todd. We expect the remaining $80 million of the regulatory milestones after that to be [indiscernible] approvals.
- Operator:
- The next question will come from the line of Robyn Karnauskas with Citi.
- Greg Harrison:
- This is Greg Harrison on for Robin. For your muscle programs, kind of a big-picture question. There's more people in the space right now and a lot of them are targeting Myostatin. Can you help us understand how you're differentiated as far target, safety, et cetera? And how do you think the market will shape up?
- Todd James:
- Greg, it's Todd. Yes, so thanks for the question. Yes, we have a pretty differentiated approach with our franchise. ACE-083 is the only locally acting muscle agent that we're aware of. And that's not just a Myostatin inhibitor. It hits other TGF-beta ligands that are important in the pathway for the negative regulators of muscle mass. And as far as efficacy in that program, there's no systemic program that's ever shown increased the muscle mass anywhere close to what we've seen in ACE-083 now in two disease in FSHD and CMT. So pretty open space for us there as far as a locally acting agent goes. And then with the systemic molecule ACE-2494, again, another Myostatin+ so hitting more than just TGF-8 where historically companies have been fairly selective around targeting GDF-8. More recently, Novartis' a program [indiscernible], which had a setback in a Phase III trial and sporadic conclusion biomyositis, but continues to be developed in other diseases for Novartis. Regeneron combined a Myostatin selective antibody with an active antibody, so similar to our Myostatin+ approach but are ligand trap [indiscernible] additional ligands that are important in the pathway. And as far as disease areas, we haven't identified the area where we'll go first with ACE-2494 at R&D Day. We gave 4 that we're evaluating currently, which are ALS, DMD, SMA and FSHD in the systemic fashion. And so stay tuned. Based off of the outcome of our Phase I, we'll give more color on where we'll be going there, but absolutely more activity in the systemic space but depending on what diseases each company picks might not even be competitive.
- Operator:
- The next question will come from the line of Martin Auster with Credit Suisse.
- Martin Auster:
- This is Mark on for Marty. So my question is feedback from clinicians related to the MDS are typically matching up the MDS market as historically underserved. And so given this, how do you plan on increasing disease awareness? And can you speak to how you see -- or what you see the uptake here are looking like?
- Habib Dable:
- Yes, thanks for the question. Perhaps I'll kick things off. This is Habib, and then I'll pass it onto our Chief Commercial Officer, Sujay Kango. Obviously, we are thrilled to potentially be a -- the first-approved pharmacology solution in this disease area. As you can imagine, the unmet need is huge. These patients have been suffering from chronic anemia for many years in certain instances and are either on chronic transfusions or are having to use off-label ESAs for a period of time until they no longer work. And so as you can imagine, there's a number of things that we're going to be engaged in as we prepare for the potential launch of luspatercept. And one of those things, as you rightfully say, is increasing disease awareness. And together with Celgene, we'll be making significant investments as we think about how we, together as a collaboration, are going to increase the awareness in this disease area. And I can tell you there are a number of activities that are ongoing today in terms of helping us continue to gain a better understanding of exactly what that baseline is and how we'll be able to help and facilitate better awareness in this area. And Sujay, perhaps you can make a couple of comments in terms of some of the specific that we're working on now.
- Sujay Kango:
- Sure. Thank you, Habib, and great question over there. Clearly, within the low-risk to intermediate MDS, there is, as you pointed out, a need for really new treatments to alleviate the transfusion, both in -- and so a lot of the effort has been relation to starting educational campaigns with regards to the science behind why MDS and beta-thal are slightly different in relation to the biology such as ineffective [indiscernible] polices and thus require a different kind of an approach for treatment for benefit of reduction in transfusions. So a lot of the effort is around starting now the Phase III [indiscernible] positive. In relation to that, as well as really understanding where the drivers are for the patient benefits to focus on that effort as well. So more to come on that, but you can rest be assured that a lot of efforts from Celgene and us are on educational campaigns in relation to all of these factors to ensure that patients get the best treatment choices moving forward in relation to MDS.
- Operator:
- The next question will come from the line of Geoff Meacham with Barclays.
- Jason Zemansky:
- This is Jason Zemansky on for Geoff. Real quickly, I mean, you talked a little bit about the education campaign. But just in terms of potential approval, what should we be thinking about in terms of the launch especially given the number of expansion indications that could possibly follow? And then just a quick follow-up on the ACE-083 program and FSHD. It looks like there's a lot of regulatory support, both with the fast-track designation as well as the orphan designation. Is there any chance you think or would the agency be more willing to potentially approve the agent if there's a threshold muscle mass or strength thing in terms of the Phase II results? Or is the expectation now that you would still need a Phase III?
- Todd James:
- Thanks, Jason. It's Todd. I'll take the ACE-083 part now, [indiscernible] Habib think about how you think about the ramp. So yes, and this disease nothing for these patients except for physical occupational therapy embracing, which both not ideal for the patient. Our base case is that we would absolutely need to do a Phase III pivotal, but let's see what the Phase II data looks like always at least the small chance that you might be able to do something with that but base case is for our pivotal at where we sit today.
- Habib Dable:
- Right. And then in terms of the other question in terms of the luspatercept opportunity. So a few things. So we and Celgene have agreed that right now when you look at the first 4 indications of MEDALIST, BELIEVE, BEYOND and COMMANDS, that there's a risk adjusted opportunity of over $2 billion in sales. That's the first thing. Regarding the specific ramp-up, obviously, the preliminary indications of MEDALIST and BELIEVE are going to be the drivers in the first countries of launch. With respect to BEYOND that, again, I think you've heard both Celgene and us discuss this concept of luspatercept potentially becoming a platform drug. And I can tell you right now that we are actively looking at a number of indications beyond the first 4 that I have just discussed. For example, myelofibrosis. We've already initiated a myelofibrosis study where we're looking at recruiting 70 patients, both looking at monotherapy because of the disease-induced anemia as well as in combination with [indiscernible] due to disease-induced anemia as well as drug-induced anemia. I think you've also recently heard based on some of the commentary from Celgene as well that now with the deal that they have recently exercised on [indiscernible] that we'll also be looking at opportunities in combining luspatercept and [indiscernible] and those discussions are also endowing. On top of that, we're also looking at other opportunities we believe now that the test Todd mentioned that we have now been able to validate luspatercept's mechanism of action in 2 distinct disease areas, we also want to take and perhaps cast a wider net and take a look at other diseases in other areas where patients are suffering from chronic anemia where we believe that luspatercept could have a benefit. So that basically the way we're thinking about the opportunity and the staging of the ramp-up and the subsequent launches.
- Operator:
- The next question comes from the line of Christopher Marai with Nomura Instinet.
- Christopher Marai:
- First, just touching upon 083 and then 2494. We've received some questions just on phase the leading risk experience with your prior Myostatin+ approach. Could you clarify how you may have corrected that with 2494? And then also when you look at bringing that into new indications, that is 2494, could you look at being into FSHD and CMT instead learning from what you've done in 083 and? How to think about the path forward for that molecule? And I have a follow-up.
- Todd James:
- Chris, it's Todd. Yes, the bleeding risk was really around our first-generation [indiscernible] ligand trap it also on top of the negative regulators of muscle mass and the pathway, it also mopped up BMP 9, which had an impact on the vasculature. And so what we're able to do with ACE-083, that design [indiscernible] naturally occurring ligand trap called [indiscernible], so that doesn't bind to BMP 9 and we also made it to be local to the muscle that you injected into, so no systemic activity there. So that also lowers any type of AE risk for the molecule. And then for 2494, we actually -- it's an IntelliTrap molecule. And so it actually mirrors the natural receptor pair of [indiscernible] four and so BMP 9 does not signal through data receptor pair. And so that ligand trap does not pick up BMP 9. And so based off of that, no, we think that we have activity in the new programs. As far as disease areas, CMT is a very focal muscle disease. And so with a systemic molecule like 2494, really no interest to take it into there. FSHD, as the patients progress, additional muscle groups do become involved in the disease. And so that could be an interesting opportunity for the systemic molecule so that remains on the list of diseases that we're evaluating as well as ALS, SMA and DMD for the molecule for the future.
- Christopher Marai:
- Got it. And then with respect to just next data sets for 083, is that something we should expect that [indiscernible] muscle? Then finally or more on the R&D day. I guess, finally, on the R&D Day, kind of like it's more PAH focused. Is the shift in the company's general focus away from the Myostatin+ approach towards PAH? Or are some exciting about programs that's driving this? Or is it a bit the muscle Myostatin program could be potentially large or something that you guys want to maybe partner out like you did with luspatercept?
- Todd James:
- Chris, it's Todd again. Yes, so the -- for October, which there's a major medical conference that you mentioned, Road Muscle Society, so you could absolutely expect there would be an update for 083 there for -- that includes the third dose cohort, which we haven't yet presented publicly, the 240 meg in the tibialis anterior and the 200 meg -- sorry, the 200 meg bilaterally in the tibialis anterior and the 240 meg unilaterally in the bicep. As far as the research and development deep-dive pulmonary is the new area for us, and so we wanted to help educate folks, hence, we're just doing a specific little deep dive just on that pulmonary area but no reason specifically. Each program is on its own communication plan as data and trials kick off at different times. So we plan different things around that similar to luspatercept us always doing something typically around to usher EHA. It's just based off of when things fall into calendar.
- Christopher Marai:
- Got it. And then the cohort three data what muscles is that going to be something that will help to find the registrational path forward. That's my last question.
- Todd James:
- Yes. I think part two of the trial, which is already ongoing, is really going to be the key data that tells us about the future of the molecule, which you can expect in the second half of next year. So as a reminder, 56 patients, 28 in each muscle group, bicep tibialis anterior 1 to 1, so 14 active, 14 placebo in each muscle. And that 20 [indiscernible] weeks, we'll look at muscle mass and their functional outcomes.
- Operator:
- The next question comes from the line of Kennen MacKay with RBC Capital Markets.
- Unidentified Analyst:
- This is Justin on for Kennen. I was wondering if you can provide some color on biomarkers for frontline MDS trial and the design of that trial? What biomarkers you're looking at, if any?
- Todd James:
- Thanks for the question, Justin. So for the COMMANDS trial, we're kicking off just here next month end of the third quarter. And once we get that up and running, things on ClinicalTrials.gov would be in a place to talk more about biomarkers and various endpoints, trial size, et cetera.
- Operator:
- The next question comes from the line of Terence Flynn with Goldman Sachs.
- Terence Flynn:
- I know you don't want to comment directly on luspatercept pricing at this point, but maybe you can just remind us of what you said in the past. And also any key inputs that you're thinking about post the data here? And then on the patient mix, again, just remind us commercial versus Medicare, Medicaid as we think about the rollout here.
- Habib Dable:
- Yes, Terence, this is Habib. Thanks for your question. I'll kick it off and hand it off to our Chief Commercial Officer, Sujay. At the end of the day, right now, we obviously have the benefit of 2 Phase III studies. We are going to take a good look at that dose data sets and we'll be engaging with research with the various pairs around the world. And we will be able to hopefully, at the end of that, be able to articulate a very clear pricing strategy in the future. Beyond that and [indiscernible] a couple of your other questions, I'd like to pass it over to Sujay in terms of some of the key insights.
- Sujay Kango:
- Sure. So one of the key questions was in relation to the split between commercial payers and Medicare population for MDS. So for the initials, since it's a disease of the elderly, largely speaking, what we see is there's going to be more than likely a 70% Medicare versus 30% commercial split. That's our initial going-in assumption for it. So it will be about a 70-30 split for MDS. That's not going to be the case for beta-thal, which has a different opportunity, younger patient population. So okay.
- Operator:
- And our next question comes from the line of Ed White with HC Wainwright.
- Edward White:
- Most of my questions were asked, but I just wanted to -- you talked about the need for marketing and educational campaigns, et cetera, et cetera. And along with the sales and marketing efforts, when can we see a more material investment and an impact on the SG&A line? I was thinking more that should be after the submission? Or around the submission date? Or looking to may be later in 2019 or 2020?
- Habib Dable:
- This is Habib. Thanks for your question. So yes, we will be engaging in a number of activities now specifically as we prepare for launch and specifically, in North America. But I do want to remind you that in terms of specifically the accounting impact associated with that is going to be much minimal because the contract with Celgene is basically they are funding our commercial efforts in North America and the subsequent investments that we'll be making as we jointly commercialize luspatercept in North America.
- Operator:
- And I'm showing no further questions. I would now like to the conference back over to Mr. Habib Dable for any closing remarks.
- Habib Dable:
- Thank you, everyone, for joining us in the call. Thank you for your continued interest. We as a company are obviously thrilled with the latest results of the two Phase 3s and then we very much look forward to expanding upon the details of those results at an upcoming congress by year-end. And so with that, thank you again and wishing you all a great evening.
- Operator:
- Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for participating in today's conference. This does conclude your program. You may all disconnect. Everyone, have a great day.
Other Acceleron Pharma Inc. earnings call transcripts:
- Q2 (2021) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2021) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2020) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2020) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2020) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2019) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q3 (2019) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q2 (2019) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q1 (2019) XLRN earnings call transcript
- Q4 (2018) XLRN earnings call transcript